Beck Jimmy B, McDaniel Corrie E, Bradford Miranda C, Brock Doug, Sy Carolyn D, Chen Tiffany, Foti Jeffrey, White Andrew A
Departments of Pediatrics and
Departments of Pediatrics and.
Hosp Pediatr. 2018 Mar;8(3):119-126. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2017-0183. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
Establishing a high-value care (HVC) culture within an institution requires a multidisciplinary commitment and participation. Bedside rounds provide an ideal environment for role modeling and learning behaviors that promote an HVC culture. However, little is understood regarding the types of HVC discussions that take place at the bedside and who participates in those discussions.
A prospective observational study at a tertiary-care, university-affiliated, free-standing children's hospital. The prevalence of HVC discussions was captured by using the HVC Rounding Tool, a previously developed instrument with established validity evidence. For each observed HVC discussion, raters recorded who initiated the discussion and a description of the topic.
Raters observed 660 patient encounters over 59 separate dates. Of all patient encounters, 29% (191 of 660; 95% confidence interval: 26%-33%) included at least 1 observed HVC discussion. The attending physician or fellow initiated 41% of all HVC discussions, followed by residents or medical students (31%), families (12%), and nurses (7%).
Despite a recent focus on improving health care value and educating trainees in the practice of HVC, our study demonstrated that bedside discussions of HVC are occurring with a limited frequency at our institution and that attending physicians initiate the majority of discussions. The capacity of the nonphysician team members to contribute to establishing and sustaining an HVC culture may be underused. Multi-institutional studies are necessary to determine if this is a national trend and whether discussions have an impact on patient outcomes and hospital costs.
在机构内建立高价值医疗(HVC)文化需要多学科的投入和参与。床边查房为塑造促进HVC文化的行为及学习这些行为提供了理想的环境。然而,对于床边进行的HVC讨论的类型以及参与这些讨论的人员,我们了解甚少。
在一家三级医疗、大学附属的独立儿童医院进行一项前瞻性观察研究。使用HVC查房工具来记录HVC讨论的发生率,该工具是之前开发的且有既定效度证据的仪器。对于每次观察到的HVC讨论,评估者记录讨论的发起者以及主题描述。
评估者在59个不同日期观察了660次患者诊疗过程。在所有患者诊疗过程中,29%(660次中的191次;95%置信区间:26%-33%)至少包含1次观察到的HVC讨论。所有HVC讨论中,41%由主治医师或住院医师发起,其次是住院医生或医学生(31%)、家属(12%)和护士(7%)。
尽管近期关注于提高医疗保健价值以及在HVC实践中培训实习生,但我们的研究表明,在我们机构中床边HVC讨论的发生频率有限,且大多数讨论由主治医师发起。非医师团队成员对建立和维持HVC文化做出贡献的能力可能未得到充分利用。需要进行多机构研究以确定这是否是一种全国性趋势,以及这些讨论是否对患者结局和医院成本有影响。