• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实地慈善捐赠研究表明,互惠关系会随时间的推移而衰减。

Field study of charitable giving reveals that reciprocity decays over time.

机构信息

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 20;115(8):1766-1771. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708293115. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1708293115
PMID:29437955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5828571/
Abstract

We examine how reciprocity changes over time by studying a large quasiexperiment in the field. Specifically, we analyze administrative data from a university hospital system. The data include information about over 18,000 donation requests made by the hospital system via mail to a set of its former patients in the 4 months after their first hospital visit. We exploit quasiexperimental variation in the timing of solicitation mailings relative to patient hospital visits and find that an extra 30-day delay between the provision of medical care and a donation solicitation decreases the likelihood of a donation by 30%. Our findings have important implications for models of economic behavior, which currently fail to incorporate reciprocity's sensitivity to time. The fact that reciprocal behavior decays rapidly as time passes also suggests the importance of capitalizing quickly on opportunities to benefit from a quid pro quo.

摘要

我们通过研究一个大型的现场准实验来研究互惠关系随时间的变化。具体来说,我们分析了一家大学医院系统的行政数据。这些数据包括了医院系统通过邮件向其一组前患者发送的 18000 多个捐赠请求的信息,这些请求是在患者首次就诊后的 4 个月内发出的。我们利用请求邮件的发送时间与患者就诊时间之间的准实验性差异,发现医疗服务提供和捐赠请求之间的时间间隔每增加 30 天,捐赠的可能性就会降低 30%。我们的发现对经济行为模型具有重要意义,因为这些模型目前未能将互惠关系对时间的敏感性纳入其中。互惠行为随时间迅速衰减的事实也表明,利用互惠机会迅速获益非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ad/5828571/5207c7749d35/pnas.1708293115fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ad/5828571/5207c7749d35/pnas.1708293115fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ad/5828571/5207c7749d35/pnas.1708293115fig01.jpg

相似文献

1
Field study of charitable giving reveals that reciprocity decays over time.实地慈善捐赠研究表明,互惠关系会随时间的推移而衰减。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 20;115(8):1766-1771. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708293115. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
2
Revisiting "The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups": continuous reciprocity in the repeated n-person prisoner's dilemma.重新审视“大群体中互惠行为的演化”:重复 n 人囚徒困境中的连续互惠。
J Theor Biol. 2010 May 21;264(2):188-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.01.028. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
3
Blood donors' helping behavior is driven by warm glow: more evidence for the blood donor benevolence hypothesis.献血者的助人行为是由温暖的光芒驱动的:更多支持献血者仁慈假设的证据。
Transfusion. 2012 Oct;52(10):2189-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03557.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
4
Traditional and social media coverage and charitable giving following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti.传统媒体和社交媒体对 2010 年海地地震的报道和慈善捐赠。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012 Aug;27(4):319-24. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12000908. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
5
Set Size and Donation Behavior.集合规模与捐赠行为。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 18;13:800528. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800528. eCollection 2022.
6
Four motivations for charitable giving: implications for marketing strategy to attract monetary donations for medical research.慈善捐赠的四个动机:对吸引医学研究资金捐赠的营销策略的启示。
J Health Care Mark. 1988 Jun;8(2):31-7.
7
Tax economics of charitable giving: pointers for the hospital and donor.慈善捐赠的税收经济学:给医院和捐赠者的建议
Top Health Care Financ. 1980 Winter;7(2):77-89.
8
Organ donation as an 'altruistic gift': incentives and reciprocity in deceased organ donation from a UK Polish migrant perspective.作为“利他性馈赠”的器官捐赠:从英国波兰移民视角看死者器官捐赠中的激励与互惠
Ann Transplant. 2014 Jan 17;19:23-31. doi: 10.12659/AOT.889745.
9
Mechanism of altruism approach to blood donor recruitment and retention: a review and future directions.无偿献血招募与保留的利他主义方法机制:综述与未来方向
Transfus Med. 2015 Aug;25(4):211-26. doi: 10.1111/tme.12233. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
10
Framing charitable donations as exceptional expenses increases giving.将慈善捐赠视为特殊支出会增加捐赠。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015 Jun;21(2):130-9. doi: 10.1037/xap0000047. Epub 2015 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Mathematical foundations of moral preferences.道德偏好的数学基础。
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Feb;18(175):20200880. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0880. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
CORR Insights®: Small Social Incentives Did Not Improve the Survey Response Rate of Patients Who Underwent Orthopaedic Surgery: A Randomized Trial.CORR见解®:小型社会激励措施并未提高接受骨科手术患者的调查回复率:一项随机试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1657-1658. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000811.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement.医院绩效薪酬的效果:质量改进的经验教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):690-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1277.
2
Reciprocity, culture and human cooperation: previous insights and a new cross-cultural experiment.互惠、文化与人类合作:先前的见解与一项新的跨文化实验。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):791-806. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0275.
3
The seven sins of memory. Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience.
记忆的七大罪。来自心理学和认知神经科学的见解。
Am Psychol. 1999 Mar;54(3):182-203. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.182.
4
A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower.延迟满足的热/冷系统分析:意志力的动态变化
Psychol Rev. 1999 Jan;106(1):3-19. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.106.1.3.