Suppr超能文献

卫生专业人员和验尸官对非侵入性围产期和儿科尸检的看法:一项定性研究。

Health professionals' and coroners' views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study.

机构信息

North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Genetics and Genomic Medicine, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2018 Jun;103(6):572-578. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314424. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess health professionals' and coroners' attitudes towards non-minimally and minimally invasive autopsy in the perinatal and paediatric setting.

METHODS

A qualitative study using semistructured interviews. Data were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Twenty-five health professionals (including perinatal/paediatric pathologists and anatomical pathology technologists, obstetricians, fetal medicine consultants and bereavement midwives, intensive care consultants and family liaison nurses, a consultant neonatologist and a paediatric radiologist) and four coroners participated. Participants viewed less invasive methods of autopsy as a positive development in prenatal and paediatric care that could increase autopsy rates. Several procedural and psychological benefits were highlighted including improved diagnostic accuracy in some circumstances, potential for faster turnaround times, parental familiarity with imaging and laparoscopic approaches, and benefits to parents and faith groups who object to invasive approaches. Concerns around the limitations of the technology such not reaching the same levels of certainty as full autopsy, unsuitability of imaging in certain circumstances, the potential for missing a diagnosis (or misdiagnosis) and de-skilling the workforce were identified. Finally, a number of implementation issues were raised including skills and training requirements for pathologists and radiologists, access to scanning equipment, required computational infrastructure, need for a multidisciplinary approach to interpret results, cost implications, equity of access and acceptance from health professionals and hospital managers.

CONCLUSION

Health professionals and coroners viewed less invasive autopsy as a positive development in perinatal and paediatric care. However, to inform implementation a detailed health economic analysis and further exploration of parental views, particularly in different religious groups, are required.

摘要

目的

评估卫生专业人员和验尸官对围产期和儿科环境中非微创和微创尸检的态度。

方法

使用半结构化访谈进行定性研究。数据进行主题分析。

结果

25 名卫生专业人员(包括围产期/儿科病理学家和解剖病理学技术员、产科医生、胎儿医学顾问和丧亲助产士、重症监护顾问和家庭联络护士、顾问新生儿科医生和儿科放射科医生)和 4 名验尸官参与了研究。参与者认为,侵入性较小的尸检方法是产前和儿科护理的积极发展,可以提高尸检率。强调了一些程序和心理上的好处,包括在某些情况下提高诊断准确性、潜在的更快周转时间、父母对成像和腹腔镜方法的熟悉程度,以及对反对侵入性方法的父母和宗教团体的好处。还关注了该技术的一些局限性,例如无法达到与全面尸检相同的确定性、在某些情况下成像不适宜、潜在的漏诊(或误诊)和劳动力技能下降。最后,提出了一些实施问题,包括病理学家和放射科医生的技能和培训要求、扫描设备的获取、所需的计算基础设施、需要多学科方法来解释结果、成本影响、公平获得以及卫生专业人员和医院管理人员的接受程度。

结论

卫生专业人员和验尸官认为,微创尸检是围产期和儿科护理的积极发展。然而,为了进行实施,需要进行详细的健康经济分析,并进一步探讨父母的观点,特别是在不同的宗教群体中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验