North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Genetics and Genomic Medicine, The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
BJOG. 2019 May;126(6):745-753. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15591. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
To investigate whether less invasive methods of autopsy would be acceptable to bereaved parents and likely to increase uptake.
Mixed methods study.
Bereaved parents recruited prospectively across seven hospitals in England and retrospectively through four parent support organisations.
Eight hundred and fifty-nine surveys and 20 interviews with bereaved parents.
Cross-sectional survey and qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews.
Likely uptake, preferences, factors impacting decision-making, views on different autopsy methods.
Overall, 90.5% of participants indicated that they would consent to some form of less invasive autopsy [either minimally invasive autopsy (MIA), non-invasive autopsy (NIA) or both]; 53.8% would consent to standard autopsy, 74.3% to MIA and 77.3% to NIA. Regarding parental preferences, 45.5% preferred MIA, 30.8% preferred NIA and 14.3% preferred standard autopsy. Participants who indicated they would decline standard autopsy but would consent to a less invasive option were significantly more likely to have a lower educational level (odds ratio 0.49; 95% CI 0.35-0.70; P = 0.000062). Qualitative findings suggest that parents value NIA because of the lack of any incision and MIA is considered a good compromise as it enables tissue sampling while easing the parental burden associated with consenting to standard autopsy.
Less invasive methods of autopsy are acceptable alternatives for bereaved parents, and if offered, are likely to increase uptake and improve parental experience. Further health economic, validation and implementation studies are now required to assess the viability of offering these in routine widespread clinical care.
Mixed methods UK study finds less invasive methods of autopsy are acceptable alternatives for bereaved parents, and if offered, are likely to increase uptake and improve parental experience.
调查对于悲痛欲绝的父母来说,非侵入性尸检方法是否可以被接受,以及这些方法是否有可能增加尸检率。
混合方法研究。
在英格兰的 7 家医院前瞻性招募悲痛欲绝的父母,以及通过 4 个家长支持组织回顾性招募。
859 份问卷调查和 20 名悲痛欲绝的父母的访谈。
横断面调查和定性半结构式电话访谈。
可能的接受程度、偏好、影响决策的因素、对不同尸检方法的看法。
总体而言,90.5%的参与者表示他们愿意接受某种形式的非侵入性尸检[微创尸检(MIA)、非侵入性尸检(NIA)或两者兼有];53.8%的人愿意接受标准尸检,74.3%的人愿意接受 MIA,77.3%的人愿意接受 NIA。关于父母的偏好,45.5%的人更喜欢 MIA,30.8%的人更喜欢 NIA,14.3%的人更喜欢标准尸检。表示他们会拒绝标准尸检,但会同意选择非侵入性方法的参与者,其受教育程度明显较低(比值比 0.49;95%置信区间 0.35-0.70;P=0.000062)。定性研究结果表明,父母之所以喜欢 NIA,是因为它没有切口,而 MIA 被认为是一个很好的折衷方案,因为它可以在征得父母同意进行标准尸检的同时,允许进行组织取样,从而减轻父母的负担。
对于悲痛欲绝的父母来说,非侵入性尸检方法是可以接受的替代方法,如果提供这些方法,可能会增加尸检率,并改善父母的体验。现在需要进行更多的健康经济学、验证和实施研究,以评估在常规广泛的临床护理中提供这些方法的可行性。
英国的一项混合方法研究发现,对于悲痛欲绝的父母来说,非侵入性尸检方法是可以接受的替代方法,如果提供这些方法,可能会增加尸检率,并改善父母的体验。