Brunel University London, London, UK.
Central Queensland University, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1131-4.
Driving licensing jurisdictions require detailed assessments of fitness-to-drive from occupational therapy driver assessors (OTDAs). We developed decision training based on the recommendations of expert OTDAs, to enhance novices' capacity to make optimal fitness-to-drive decisions. The aim of this research was to determine effectiveness of training on novice occupational therapists' ability to make fitness-to-drive decisions.
A double blind, parallel, randomised controlled trial was conducted to test the effectiveness of decision training on novices' fitness-to-drive recommendations. Both groups made recommendations on a series of 64 case scenarios with the intervention group receiving training after reviewing two thirds of the cases; the control group, at this same point, just received a message of encouragement to continue. Participants were occupational therapy students on UK and Australian pre-registration programmes who individually took part online, following the website instructions. The main outcome of training was the reduction in mean difference between novice and expert recommendations on the cases.
Two hundred eighty-nine novices were randomised into intervention; 166 completed the trial (70 in intervention; 96 in control). No statistical differences in scores were found pre-training. Post training, the control group showed no significant change in recommendations compared to the experts (t(96) = -.69; p = .5), whereas the intervention group exhibited a significant change (t(69) = 6.89; p < 0.001). For the intervention group, the mean difference compared with the experts' recommendations reduced with 95% CI from -.13 to .09. Effect size calculated at the post-training demonstrated a moderate effect (d = .69, r = .32).
Novices who received the decision training were able to change their recommendations whereas those who did not receive training did not. Those receiving training became more able to identify drivers who were not fit-to-drive, as measured against experts' decisions on the same cases. This research demonstrated that novice occupational therapists can be trained to make decisions more aligned to those of expert OTDAs. The decision training and cases have been launched as a free training resource at www.fitnesstodrive.com . This can be used by novice driver assessors to increase their skill to identify drivers who are, and are not fit-to-drive, potentially increasing international workforce capacity in this growing field of practice.
驾驶执照管理机构要求职业治疗师驾驶员评估员(OTDA)对驾驶适宜性进行详细评估。我们根据专家 OTDA 的建议制定了决策培训,以提高新手做出最佳驾驶适宜性决策的能力。本研究的目的是确定培训对新手职业治疗师做出驾驶适宜性决策能力的有效性。
采用双盲、平行、随机对照试验,测试决策培训对新手驾驶适宜性建议的有效性。两组对 64 个案例场景进行了建议,干预组在审查三分之二的案例后接受培训;对照组在同一时间只收到继续的鼓励信息。参与者是英国和澳大利亚注册前课程的职业治疗学生,他们在线上单独按照网站说明参与。培训的主要结果是减少新手和专家在案例上建议的平均差异。
289 名新手被随机分为干预组;166 名完成了试验(干预组 70 名;对照组 96 名)。培训前两组在分数上没有统计学差异。培训后,对照组与专家相比,建议没有明显变化(t(96)=-.69;p=.5),而干预组则表现出明显变化(t(69)=6.89;p<.001)。对于干预组,与专家建议的平均差异缩小,95%CI 为 -.13 至.09。培训后的效应量显示出中等效应(d=0.69,r=0.32)。
接受决策培训的新手能够改变他们的建议,而没有接受培训的新手则没有。那些接受培训的人变得更能够识别不适合驾驶的司机,这与专家对同一案例的决策相比较。这项研究表明,新手职业治疗师可以接受培训,使他们的决策更符合专家 OTDA 的决策。决策培训和案例已在 www.fitnesstodrive.com 上推出作为免费培训资源。这可以供新手驾驶员评估员使用,以提高他们识别适合和不适合驾驶的司机的技能,从而有可能增加这个不断发展的实践领域的国际劳动力能力。