• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的炎症性肠病生物制剂比较疗效和安全性队列研究。

Population-based cohort study on comparative effectiveness and safety of biologics in inflammatory bowel disease.

作者信息

Di Domenicantonio Riccardo, Trotta Francesco, Cascini Silvia, Agabiti Nera, Kohn Anna, Gasbarrini Antonio, Davoli Marina, Addis Antonio

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.

IBD Unit, AO San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 5;10:203-213. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S150030. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S150030
PMID:29440933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5804123/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The comparison of effectiveness and safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is relevant for clinical practice and stakeholders.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the risk of abdominal surgery, steroid utilization, and hospitalization for infection in Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) patients newly treated with infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA).

METHODS

A retrospective population-based cohort study was performed using health information systems data from Lazio region, Italy. Patients with CD or UC diagnosis were enrolled at first prescription of IFX or ADA during 2008-2014 (index date). Only new drug users were followed for 2 years from the index date. IFX versus ADA adjusted hazard ratios were calculated applying "intention-to-treat" approach, controlling for several characteristics and stratifying the analysis on steroid use according to previous drug utilization. Sensitivity analyses were performed according to "as-treated" approach, adjusting for propensity score, censoring at switching or discontinuation, and evaluating different lengths of follow-up periods.

RESULTS

We enrolled 1,432 IBD patients (42% and 83% exposed to IFX for CD and UC, respectively). In both diseases, treatment effects did not differ in any outcome considered, and sensitivity analyses confirmed the results from the main analysis.

CONCLUSION

In our population-based cohort study, effectiveness and safety data in new users of ADA or IFX with CD or UC were comparable for the outcomes we tested.

摘要

背景

比较抗肿瘤坏死因子-α药物治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)的有效性和安全性对临床实践及相关利益者具有重要意义。

目的

本研究旨在比较初治克罗恩病(CD)或溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者使用英夫利昔单抗(IFX)或阿达木单抗(ADA)后腹部手术风险、类固醇使用情况及感染住院情况。

方法

利用意大利拉齐奥地区的健康信息系统数据进行一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。2008年至2014年期间,CD或UC诊断患者在首次开具IFX或ADA处方时纳入研究(索引日期)。仅新用药患者从索引日期起随访2年。采用“意向性治疗”方法计算IFX与ADA的调整后风险比,控制多个特征,并根据既往用药情况对类固醇使用情况进行分层分析。根据“实际治疗”方法进行敏感性分析,调整倾向得分,在换药或停药时进行删失,并评估不同随访期。

结果

我们纳入了1432例IBD患者(分别有42%和83%的CD和UC患者使用IFX)。在这两种疾病中,所考虑的任何结局的治疗效果均无差异,敏感性分析证实了主要分析结果。

结论

在我们基于人群的队列研究中,CD或UC患者使用ADA或IFX新用户的有效性和安全性数据在所测试的结局方面具有可比性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0645/5804123/500aa4e56f1c/clep-10-203Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0645/5804123/5ff9bfb9d59c/clep-10-203Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0645/5804123/500aa4e56f1c/clep-10-203Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0645/5804123/5ff9bfb9d59c/clep-10-203Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0645/5804123/500aa4e56f1c/clep-10-203Fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Population-based cohort study on comparative effectiveness and safety of biologics in inflammatory bowel disease.基于人群的炎症性肠病生物制剂比较疗效和安全性队列研究。
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 5;10:203-213. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S150030. eCollection 2018.
2
Comparative effectiveness and safety of infliximab and adalimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis.英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗治疗溃疡性结肠炎患者的疗效及安全性比较
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 May;43(9):994-1003. doi: 10.1111/apt.13580. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
3
[Long-term follow-up of inflammatory bowel disease patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy].接受抗肿瘤坏死因子-α治疗的炎症性肠病患者的长期随访
Orv Hetil. 2020 Nov 22;161(47):1989-1994. doi: 10.1556/650.2020.31913.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Infliximab and Adalimumab in Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis.英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗在克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎中的疗效比较
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016 Apr;22(4):880-5. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000754.
5
Comparison of Real-World Outcomes of Infliximab versus Adalimumab in Biologic-Naïve Korean Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Population-Based Study.生物制剂初治的韩国溃疡性结肠炎患者中英夫利昔单抗与阿达木单抗真实世界结局的比较:一项基于人群的研究。
Yonsei Med J. 2020 Jan;61(1):48-55. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.1.48.
6
Comparative Efficacy of Vedolizumab and Adalimumab in Ulcerative Colitis Patients Previously Treated With Infliximab.比较维得利珠单抗和阿达木单抗在先前接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者中的疗效。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019 Oct 18;25(11):1805-1812. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izz057.
7
Ulcerative Colitis Treatment Patterns and Cost of Care.溃疡性结肠炎的治疗模式与护理成本。
Value Health. 2017 Jun;20(6):752-761. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
8
Comparison of Long-term Outcomes of Infliximab versus Adalimumab in 1,488 Biologic-Naive Korean Patients with Crohn's Disease.比较英夫利昔单抗与阿达木单抗在 1488 例生物初治克罗恩病韩国患者中的长期疗效。
Gut Liver. 2021 Jan 15;15(1):92-99. doi: 10.5009/gnl19377.
9
INFLIXIMAB AND ADALIMUMAB SERUM TROUGH CONCENTRATIONS THRESHOLD ASSOCIATED WITH DEEP REMISSION IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE.英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗血清谷浓度阈值与炎症性肠病深度缓解相关
Farm Hosp. 2021 Aug 25;45(5):225-233.
10
Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of a second anti-TNF in patients with inflammatory bowel disease whose previous anti-TNF treatment has failed.系统评价与荟萃分析:在先前抗 TNF 治疗失败的炎症性肠病患者中使用第二种抗 TNF 的疗效。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Apr;41(7):613-23. doi: 10.1111/apt.13083. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease patients.英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗治疗炎症性肠病患者的疗效和安全性。
Inflammopharmacology. 2024 Oct;32(5):3259-3269. doi: 10.1007/s10787-024-01508-w. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
2
Sustainability of biologic treatment in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease: population-based registry analysis.儿童克罗恩病患者生物治疗的可持续性:基于人群的登记分析
Pediatr Res. 2024 Oct;96(5):1283-1291. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02913-7. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
3
Adalimumab Serum Concentrations, Clinical and Endoscopic Disease Activity in Crohn's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Multicentric Latin American Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Associated with Discontinuation of Anti-TNF Inhibitors Among Persons with IBD: A Population-Based Analysis.炎症性肠病患者中与停用抗TNF抑制剂相关的因素:一项基于人群的分析。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Mar;23(3):409-420. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001025.
2
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents in Biologic-Naive Patients With Crohn's Disease.抗肿瘤坏死因子药物在初治克罗恩病患者中的疗效及安全性比较
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Aug;14(8):1120-1129.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.038. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
3
Selective biologics for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease - clinical utility of vedolizumab.
阿达木单抗血清浓度、克罗恩病的临床及内镜疾病活动度:一项拉丁美洲多中心横断面研究
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 9;15(2):586. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020586.
4
Factors associated with health-related quality of life in patients with Crohn's disease in Iran: A prospective observational study.伊朗克罗恩病患者健康相关生活质量的相关因素:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 19;9:1091330. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1091330. eCollection 2022.
5
Adalimumab for induction of remission in patients with Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿达木单抗诱导克罗恩病患者缓解的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Sep 30;27(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00817-6.
6
Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in comparison to infliximab for Crohn's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阿达木单抗与英夫利昔单抗治疗克罗恩病的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jun 26;10(18):6091-6104. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i18.6091.
7
Comparison of Long-term Outcomes of Infliximab versus Adalimumab in 1,488 Biologic-Naive Korean Patients with Crohn's Disease.比较英夫利昔单抗与阿达木单抗在 1488 例生物初治克罗恩病韩国患者中的长期疗效。
Gut Liver. 2021 Jan 15;15(1):92-99. doi: 10.5009/gnl19377.
8
Comparison of Real-World Outcomes of Infliximab versus Adalimumab in Biologic-Naïve Korean Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Population-Based Study.生物制剂初治的韩国溃疡性结肠炎患者中英夫利昔单抗与阿达木单抗真实世界结局的比较:一项基于人群的研究。
Yonsei Med J. 2020 Jan;61(1):48-55. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.1.48.
9
Comparative Risk of Serious Infections With Biologic and/or Immunosuppressive Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较生物制剂和/或免疫抑制剂治疗炎症性肠病患者严重感染风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;18(1):69-81.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.02.044. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
溃疡性结肠炎和克罗恩病的选择性生物制剂——维多珠单抗的临床应用
Biologics. 2016 Mar 9;10:33-52. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S71679. eCollection 2016.
4
Comparison of real-world outcomes of adalimumab and infliximab for patients with ulcerative colitis in the United States.美国溃疡性结肠炎患者使用阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗的真实世界疗效比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Jul;32(7):1233-41. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1168290. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
5
Effectiveness Research in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Necessity and a Methodological Challenge.炎症性肠病的有效性研究:必要性与方法学挑战
J Crohns Colitis. 2016 Sep;10(9):1096-102. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw068. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Infliximab and Adalimumab in Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis.英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗在克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎中的疗效比较
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016 Apr;22(4):880-5. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000754.
7
Biologic agents for IBD: practical insights.炎症性肠病的生物制剂治疗:实用见解。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Sep;12(9):537-45. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.135. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
8
Intravenous Versus Subcutaneous Anti-TNF-Alpha Agents for Crohn's Disease: A Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety.静脉注射与皮下注射抗 TNF-α 药物治疗克罗恩病:有效性和安全性比较。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Jul;21(7):559-66. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.7.559.
9
Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of a second anti-TNF in patients with inflammatory bowel disease whose previous anti-TNF treatment has failed.系统评价与荟萃分析:在先前抗 TNF 治疗失败的炎症性肠病患者中使用第二种抗 TNF 的疗效。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Apr;41(7):613-23. doi: 10.1111/apt.13083. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
10
Current and emerging biologics for ulcerative colitis.溃疡性结肠炎的现有及新型生物制剂
Gut Liver. 2015 Jan;9(1):18-27. doi: 10.5009/gnl14226.