• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两个极端年龄组(<50岁与>65岁)患者接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的结果。

Outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for patients in two extreme age-groups (< 50 years vs > 65 years).

作者信息

Coman Radu-Tudor, Crisan Nicolae, Andras Iulia, Bud Gabriela, Matei Deliu-Victor, DE Cobelli Ottavio, Coman Ioan, Bocsan Ioan-Stelian

机构信息

Epidemiology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Urology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

Clujul Med. 2018;91(1):92-97. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-825. Epub 2018 Jan 15.

DOI:10.15386/cjmed-825
PMID:29440957
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5808275/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To assess the outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy in two different age subgroups of pre-operatively potent patients: younger than 50 years and older than 65 years.

METHODS

We included in the present study a number of 202 patients with prostate cancer divided into two groups: 99 patients older than 65 years (group 1) and 103 patients younger than 50 years (group 2).

RESULTS

More than half of the younger patients were low-risk vs 57% of the older patients who were high-risk. Overall positive surgical margins rate was 21.2% in group 1 vs 12.1% in group 2. The early biochemical recurrence at 6 months after radical prostatectomy was 4% in group 1 vs 11.6% in group 2. The continence rate at 6 months was similar between the two groups and was not correlated with the patients' age (p=0.72), nerve-sparing (p=0.3 for group 1, p=0.92 for group 2) or pathological staging (overall p=0.81, p=0.89 in group 1 and p=0.63 in group 2). We observed a significantly higher rate of potency for patients in group 2 (91.5% vs 47.2%, p<0.0001). The most important factor associated with the regain of potency at 6 months after the procedure was the age of the patient (p<0.0001), independently of the type of nerve-sparing performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Age seems to be the most important predictor of the regain of potency after robotic radical prostatectomy. Patients should be counseled accordingly in order to have realistic expectations about the functional results after robotic-assisted surgery.

摘要

背景与目的

评估机器人根治性前列腺切除术在术前性功能正常的两个不同年龄亚组患者中的疗效:年龄小于50岁和年龄大于65岁。

方法

本研究纳入了202例前列腺癌患者,分为两组:99例年龄大于65岁的患者(第1组)和103例年龄小于50岁的患者(第2组)。

结果

超过一半的年轻患者为低风险,而老年患者中57%为高风险。第1组的总体手术切缘阳性率为21.2%,第2组为12.1%。根治性前列腺切除术后6个月的早期生化复发率,第1组为4%,第2组为11.6%。两组6个月时的控尿率相似,且与患者年龄(p=0.72)、保留神经(第1组p=0.3,第2组p=0.92)或病理分期(总体p=0.81,第1组p=0.89,第2组p=0.63)无关。我们观察到第2组患者的性功能恢复率显著更高(91.5%对47.2%,p<0.0001)。与术后6个月性功能恢复相关的最重要因素是患者年龄(p<0.0001),与所进行的保留神经类型无关。

结论

年龄似乎是机器人根治性前列腺切除术后性功能恢复的最重要预测因素。应相应地向患者提供咨询,以便他们对机器人辅助手术后的功能结果有现实的期望。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for patients in two extreme age-groups (< 50 years vs > 65 years).两个极端年龄组(<50岁与>65岁)患者接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的结果。
Clujul Med. 2018;91(1):92-97. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-825. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
2
Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中高危前列腺癌保留神经的安全性
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
3
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助微创手术在妇科和泌尿外科肿瘤学中的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
4
Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.与经耻骨后开放前列腺切除术相比,双侧神经保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与更快的控尿恢复相关,但与勃起功能恢复无关:需要准确选择患者。
Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;29(6):2445-50. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2365. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
5
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
6
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘的发生率及位置比较。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
7
Early biochemical recurrence, urinary continence and potency outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的早期生化复发、尿失禁和性功能结果
Scand J Urol. 2014 Aug;48(4):356-66. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.893534. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
8
Oncological and functional outcomes in patients over 70 years of age treated with robotic radical prostatectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.70岁以上患者接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤学和功能结果:一项倾向匹配分析。
World J Urol. 2021 Apr;39(4):1131-1140. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03304-x. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
9
Age stratified functional outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后按年龄分层的功能结局
J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2448-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.153.
10
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer.保留 Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:在侵袭性和局部进展性前列腺癌中的功能和早期肿瘤学结果。
BMC Urol. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0550-9.

引用本文的文献

1
A matched and controlled longitudinal cohort study of dehydrated human amniotic membrane allograft sheet used as a wraparound nerve bundles in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a puissant adjunct for enhanced potency outcomes.一项包裹神经束的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术使用脱水人羊膜移植物片的配对和对照纵向队列研究:增强勃起功能的有力辅助手段。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Jun;13(3):475-481. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0873-7. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-ESTRO-SIOG 前列腺癌诊治指南。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断及有治愈意图的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
2
Clinicopathological, functional, and immediate oncologic outcome assessment in men aged≤50 years with prostate cancer after robotic prostatectomy.≤50岁前列腺癌男性机器人前列腺切除术后的临床病理、功能及近期肿瘤学结局评估
Urol Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):30.e17-30.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
3
Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane Allograft Nerve Wrap Around the Prostatic Neurovascular Bundle Accelerates Early Return to Continence and Potency Following Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Propensity Score-matched Analysis.脱水人羊膜/绒毛膜同种异体神经包裹前列腺神经血管束加速机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术后早期恢复控尿和勃起功能:倾向评分匹配分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):977-980. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
4
Age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的年龄分层结局
J Robot Surg. 2007;1(2):125-32. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0009-y. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
5
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: inching toward gold standard.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:逐渐成为金标准。
Urol Clin North Am. 2014 Nov;41(4):473-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
6
A Pilot Study of Laparoscopic Doppler Ultrasound Probe to Map Arterial Vascular Flow within the Neurovascular Bundle during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.一项关于在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中使用腹腔镜多普勒超声探头绘制神经血管束内动脉血流图谱的初步研究。
Prostate Cancer. 2013;2013:810715. doi: 10.1155/2013/810715. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
7
Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: comparison of pentafecta rates for a single surgeon.腹腔镜与机器人辅助双侧保留神经根治性前列腺切除术:单一外科医生的五连胜率比较
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4297-304. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3046-9. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
8
Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.与经耻骨后开放前列腺切除术相比,双侧神经保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与更快的控尿恢复相关,但与勃起功能恢复无关:需要准确选择患者。
Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;29(6):2445-50. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2365. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.系统评价和荟萃分析报告机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿控恢复的研究。
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.系统回顾和荟萃分析报告机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗后肿瘤学结果的研究。
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):382-404. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.047. Epub 2012 Jun 2.