• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

i-gel™与喉罩气道Supreme™在婴儿全身麻醉期间的比较。

A comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ during general anesthesia in infants.

作者信息

Lee Yoon Chan, Yoon Kyoung Seop, Park Sang Yoong, Choi So Ron, Chung Chan Jong

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb;71(1):37-42. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2018.71.1.37. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

DOI:10.4097/kjae.2018.71.1.37
PMID:29441173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5809706/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The i-gel™ (i-gel) and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ (LMA Supreme) have been safely used in children. We compared the airway performance of the i-gel and LMA Supreme in infants undergoing general anesthesia.

METHODS

Sixty infants with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were randomly assigned to place either the i-gel or the LMA Supreme. The size 1 or 1.5 of each airway was selected by the weight of infants. The primary outcome variable was oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). We also assessed insertion success rate, insertion time, fiberoptic view of the larynx, airway quality, airway manipulations, and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

Demographic data did not differ between the two groups. Insertion success rate was similar in both groups. OLP for the i-gel (26.0 ± 3.8 cmHO) was higher than for the LMA Supreme (23.7 ± 3.2 cmHO) (P = 0.016). Insertion time for the i-gel (16.4 ± 2.8 s) was shorter than for the LMA Supreme (18.5 ± 2.7 s) (P = 0.002). There were no differences in fiberoptic view of the larynx, airway quality, airway manipulations, and complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the i-gel and LMA Supreme provided a similar performance of airway in infants. Compared with the LMA Supreme, the i-gel provided shorter insertion time and higher OLP in infants.

摘要

背景

i-gel™(i-gel)喉罩和Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™(LMA Supreme)喉罩已在儿童中安全使用。我们比较了i-gel喉罩和LMA Supreme喉罩在接受全身麻醉的婴儿中的气道性能。

方法

60例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况为I或II级的婴儿被随机分配使用i-gel喉罩或LMA Supreme喉罩。根据婴儿体重选择每种气道的1号或1.5号尺寸。主要观察变量为口咽漏气压(OLP)。我们还评估了插入成功率、插入时间、喉镜光纤视野、气道质量、气道操作和围手术期并发症。

结果

两组的人口统计学数据无差异。两组的插入成功率相似。i-gel喉罩的OLP(26.0±3.8 cmH₂O)高于LMA Supreme喉罩(23.7±3.2 cmH₂O)(P = 0.016)。i-gel喉罩的插入时间(16.4±2.8秒)短于LMA Supreme喉罩(18.5±2.7秒)(P = 0.002)。两组在喉镜光纤视野、气道质量、气道操作和并发症方面无差异。

结论

本研究表明,i-gel喉罩和LMA Supreme喉罩在婴儿气道方面表现相似。与LMA Supreme喉罩相比,i-gel喉罩在婴儿中插入时间更短,OLP更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0391/5809706/095c87a3189d/kjae-71-37-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0391/5809706/095c87a3189d/kjae-71-37-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0391/5809706/095c87a3189d/kjae-71-37-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ during general anesthesia in infants.i-gel™与喉罩气道Supreme™在婴儿全身麻醉期间的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb;71(1):37-42. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2018.71.1.37. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
2
A comparison of i-gel™ and LMA Supreme™ in anesthetized and paralyzed children.喉罩(i-gel™)与喉镜片(LMA Supreme™)在全麻且肌松患儿中的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Nov;67(5):317-22. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.5.317. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
3
Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.成人患者全身麻醉期间Air-Q™、i-gel™和喉罩气道supreme™口咽漏气压的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Oct-Dec;11(4):390-395. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_149_17.
4
Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.与喉罩气道加强型相比,喉罩气道保护器产生更高的口咽漏气压:门诊手术单元的一项随机临床试验。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr-Jun;37(2):221-225. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_416_19. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
5
Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population.在自主呼吸的儿科人群中,不同头颈部位置下i-gel™喉罩与Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™喉罩的比较。
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):647-650. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_238_16.
6
Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.评估口咽漏气压和纤维光学定位的随机交叉研究:在未麻痹的麻醉儿童中,Supreme™喉罩与2号LTS II™喉管的比较
Anaesthesist. 2016 Aug;65(8):585-9. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0192-1.
7
Comparison of LMA Supreme™ with i-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children for airway management during general anaesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.喉罩 Supreme™与 i-gel™和 ProSeal™在全麻下用于小儿气道管理的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Sep;41:5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
8
LMA Supreme™ vs i-gel™--a comparison of insertion success in novices.LMA Supreme™ 与 i-gel™——新手插入成功率的比较。
Anaesthesia. 2012 Apr;67(4):384-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07002.x. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
9
Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中 Supreme 喉罩与 ProSeal 喉罩气道的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2016 Jun;54(2):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
10
Comparison of the Supreme™ and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airways in infants: a prospective randomised clinical study.婴儿使用Supreme™喉罩气道与ProSeal™喉罩气道的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Sep 5;17(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0418-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Conditions for Insertion of the Laryngeal Mask Airway in an Innovative Method vs the Classic Method.创新方法与经典方法插入喉罩气道的条件
Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Dec 7;13(6):e140999. doi: 10.5812/aapm-140999. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
[Update 2022: interdisciplinary statement on airway management with supraglottic airway devices in pediatric emergency medicine-The laryngeal mask is and remains state of the art : Joint statement of the Institute for Emergency Medicine and Medicine Management (INM), the University Clinic Munich, LMU Munich, Germany, the Working Group for Pediatric Critical Care and Emergency Medicine of the German Interdisciplinary Society for Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI), the Medical Directors of Emergency Medical Services in Bavaria (ÄLRD), the Scientific Working Group for Pediatric Anesthesia (WAKKA) of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), the Scientific Working Group for Emergency Medicine of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and the Society of Neonatology and Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (GNPI)].[2022年更新:儿科急诊医学中使用声门上气道装置进行气道管理的跨学科声明——喉罩过去是、现在仍然是先进技术:德国慕尼黑大学急诊医学与医学管理研究所(INM)、德国慕尼黑大学大学医院、德国重症与急诊医学跨学科协会(DIVI)儿科重症监护与急诊医学工作组、巴伐利亚州紧急医疗服务医疗主任(ÄLRD)、德国麻醉与重症医学协会(DGAI)儿科麻醉科学工作组(WAKKA)、德国麻醉与重症医学协会(DGAI)急诊医学科学工作组以及新生儿与儿科重症医学协会(GNPI)联合声明]

本文引用的文献

1
Small is the new big: An overview of newer supraglottic airways for children.小即是新的大:儿童新型声门上气道概述。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Oct-Dec;31(4):440-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.169048.
2
Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间i-gel®喉罩与LMA Supreme®喉罩的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct;68(5):455-61. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.455. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
3
Performance of size 1 I-gel compared with size 1 ProSeal laryngeal mask in anesthetized infants and neonates.
Anaesthesiologie. 2023 Jun;72(6):425-432. doi: 10.1007/s00101-023-01284-2. Epub 2023 May 24.
3
Adverse Events in Infants Less Than 6 Months of Age After Ambulatory Surgery and Diagnostic Imaging Requiring Anesthesia.门诊手术及需麻醉的诊断性成像后6个月以下婴儿的不良事件
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2022 Jul 1;7(4):e574. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000574. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
4
Clinical performance of Ambu AuraGain versus i-gel in anesthetized children: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.麻醉儿童中Ambu AuraGain与i-gel的临床性能:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2020 Apr 30;15(2):173-180. doi: 10.17085/apm.2020.15.2.173. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
5
Anesthetic management of an infant with Pierre Robin sequence undergoing tracheostomy using an i-gel™.使用i-gel™对患有皮埃尔·罗宾序列征的婴儿进行气管切开术的麻醉管理。
JA Clin Rep. 2019 Feb 19;5(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40981-019-0231-4.
6
Comparison of clinical performance of i-gelⓇ and Baska MaskⓇ during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.比较 i-gel Ⓡ 和 Baska 面罩 Ⓡ 在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床性能。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Dec;72(6):576-582. doi: 10.4097/kja.19195. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
7
A comparison of supraglottic devices in pediatric patients.儿科患者声门上装置的比较。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2018 Oct 1;11:361-365. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S177866. eCollection 2018.
1号I-gel与1号ProSeal喉罩在麻醉婴幼儿及新生儿中的性能比较。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:426186. doi: 10.1155/2015/426186. Epub 2015 Feb 22.
4
A comparison of i-gel™ and LMA Supreme™ in anesthetized and paralyzed children.喉罩(i-gel™)与喉镜片(LMA Supreme™)在全麻且肌松患儿中的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Nov;67(5):317-22. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.5.317. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
5
A comparative study of Laryngeal Mask Airway size 1 vs. i-gel size 1 in infants undergoing daycare procedures.在接受日间手术的婴儿中,1号喉罩气道与1号i-gel喉罩的对比研究。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Apr;25(4):386-91. doi: 10.1111/pan.12555. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
6
Randomized prospective trial comparing two supraglottic airway devices: i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in paralyzed patients.比较两种声门上气道装置(i-gel™和LMA-Supreme™)用于瘫痪患者的随机前瞻性试验。
Can J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;61(9):794-800. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0198-6. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
7
The randomized crossover comparison of airway sealing with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme(™) at three different intracuff pressures in children.在儿童中,对喉罩气道Supreme(™)在三种不同套囊压力下的气道密封进行随机交叉比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Oct;24(10):1080-7. doi: 10.1111/pan.12494. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
8
A randomised comparison of the i-gel™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic™ in infants.随机比较婴儿用 i-gel™ 和 Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic™
Anaesthesia. 2014 Apr;69(4):362-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.12592.
9
A randomized comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme™ and laryngeal mask airway unique™ in infants and children: does cuff pressure influence leak pressure?喉罩气道至尊™和喉罩气道独特™在婴幼儿中的随机对照比较:套囊压力会影响漏气压力吗?
Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Oct;23(10):927-33. doi: 10.1111/pan.12145. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
10
A randomized equivalence trial comparing the i-gel and laryngeal mask airway Supreme in children.一项比较儿童使用i-gel喉罩和Supreme喉罩气道的随机等效性试验。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Feb;23(2):127-33. doi: 10.1111/pan.12078. Epub 2012 Nov 27.