• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1号I-gel与1号ProSeal喉罩在麻醉婴幼儿及新生儿中的性能比较。

Performance of size 1 I-gel compared with size 1 ProSeal laryngeal mask in anesthetized infants and neonates.

作者信息

Kayhan Gulay Erdogan, Begec Zekine, Sanli Mukadder, Gedik Ender, Durmus Mahmut

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Inonu University Medical Faculty, B Blok Daire 11, Malatya, Turkey.

出版信息

ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:426186. doi: 10.1155/2015/426186. Epub 2015 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1155/2015/426186
PMID:25793219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4352429/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The size 1 I-gel, recommended for small infants and neonates weighing 2-5 kg, has recently been released. There are no prospective studies available that assess the insertion conditions, sealing pressures, or ventilation quality of it. This study was designed to compare the performance of recently released size 1 I-gel with size 1 ProSeal LMA.

METHODS

Fifty infants and neonates, ASA I-II were included in this prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Patients were divided into two groups for placing I-gel or ProSeal LMA. The primary outcome was airway leak pressure, and secondary outcomes included insertion time, insertion success and conditions, initial airway quality, fiberoptic view of the larynx, and complications.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in terms of airway leak pressure between the I-gel (27.44 ± 5.67) and ProSeal LMA (23.52 ± 8.15) (P = 0.054). The insertion time for the I-gel was shorter (12.6 ± 2.19 s) than for the ProSeal LMA (24.2 ± 6.059 s) (P = 0.0001). Insertion success and conditions were similar in groups. We encountered few complications.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that the size 1 I-gel provided an effective and satisfactory airway as the size 1 ProSeal LMA. It may be a good alternative supraglottic airway device for use in small infants and neonates. This trial is registered with: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01704118.

摘要

目的

最近推出了推荐用于体重2 - 5千克的小婴儿和新生儿的1号I-gel喉罩。目前尚无前瞻性研究评估其插入条件、密封压力或通气质量。本研究旨在比较新推出的1号I-gel喉罩与1号ProSeal喉罩的性能。

方法

本前瞻性、随机对照研究纳入了50例ASA I-II级的婴儿和新生儿。患者分为两组,分别置入I-gel喉罩或ProSeal喉罩。主要观察指标为气道漏气压力,次要观察指标包括插入时间、插入成功率及条件、初始气道质量、喉镜光纤视野和并发症。

结果

I-gel喉罩组(27.44±5.67)与ProSeal喉罩组(23.52±8.15)的气道漏气压力无显著差异(P = 0.054)。I-gel喉罩的插入时间(12.6±2.19秒)短于ProSeal喉罩(24.2±6.059秒)(P = 0.0001)。两组的插入成功率及条件相似。我们遇到的并发症较少。

结论

我们的研究表明,1号I-gel喉罩与1号ProSeal喉罩一样,能提供有效且令人满意的气道。它可能是用于小婴儿和新生儿的一种良好的声门上气道替代装置。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT01704118。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d52/4352429/32824d68f38f/TSWJ2015-426186.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d52/4352429/32824d68f38f/TSWJ2015-426186.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d52/4352429/32824d68f38f/TSWJ2015-426186.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance of size 1 I-gel compared with size 1 ProSeal laryngeal mask in anesthetized infants and neonates.1号I-gel与1号ProSeal喉罩在麻醉婴幼儿及新生儿中的性能比较。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:426186. doi: 10.1155/2015/426186. Epub 2015 Feb 22.
2
Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.喉罩气道ProSeal在全身麻醉成年患者中比i-gel提供更高的口咽漏气压:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Sep;33:298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 May 18.
3
Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.喉罩 Supreme 与喉罩 ProSeal 的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jul;27(7):602-7. doi: 10.1097/eja.0b013e32833679e3.
4
Comparison of Second-Generation Supraglottic Airway Devices (i-gel versus LMA ProSeal) During Elective Surgery in Children.儿童择期手术中第二代声门上气道装置(i-gel与LMA ProSeal)的比较
AANA J. 2015 Aug;83(4):275-80.
5
Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study.ProSeal喉罩气道插入技术:在一项前瞻性随机研究中,Foley气道探条工具与引导器工具的比较
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Nov 18;14:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-105. eCollection 2014.
6
Comparison of the Supreme™ and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airways in infants: a prospective randomised clinical study.婴儿使用Supreme™喉罩气道与ProSeal™喉罩气道的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Sep 5;17(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0418-z.
7
Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.卫氏喉罩与ProSeal喉罩气道的临床性能比较。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 May 1;15:69. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0039-3.
8
Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks.使用i-gel喉罩、LMA-ProSeal喉罩和LMA-Supreme喉罩进行麻醉期间相似的口咽漏气压。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2012;63(1):35-41.
9
The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients.麻醉患者中声门上气道 I-gel 与 ProSeal 喉罩气道和经典喉罩气道的比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jul;27(7):598-601. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283340a81.
10
The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.喉罩气道Supreme——一种带有食管排气孔的一次性喉罩气道。在麻痹、麻醉患者中与ProSeal喉罩气道进行的随机交叉研究。
Anaesthesia. 2009 Jan;64(1):79-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05682.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Dependence of Successful Airway Management in Neonatal Simulation Manikins on the Type of Supraglottic Airway Device and Providers' Backgrounds.新生儿模拟人体模型中成功气道管理对声门上气道装置类型及操作者背景的依赖性。
Children (Basel). 2024 Apr 28;11(5):530. doi: 10.3390/children11050530.
2
Contrast of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of I-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in patients: A meta-analysis.比较 I-gel™ 和 LMA ProSeal™ 在患者中的咽腔漏气压和临床性能:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0278871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278871. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparing I-Gel to Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Study.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized equivalence trial comparing the i-gel and laryngeal mask airway Supreme in children.一项比较儿童使用i-gel喉罩和Supreme喉罩气道的随机等效性试验。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Feb;23(2):127-33. doi: 10.1111/pan.12078. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
2
A clinical evaluation of the I-gel ™ supraglottic airway device in children.I-gel™ 声门上气道装置在儿童中的临床评估
Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Aug;22(8):765-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03893.x. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
3
A randomised comparison of the LMA SupremeTM and LMAProSealTM in children.
婴儿中I-Gel喉罩与Proseal喉罩气道的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床研究。
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020 Aug;48(4):308-313. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.47936. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
4
Formulating a good research question: Pearls and pitfalls.提出一个好的研究问题:要点与陷阱。
Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;63(8):611-616. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_198_19.
5
A comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ during general anesthesia in infants.i-gel™与喉罩气道Supreme™在婴儿全身麻醉期间的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb;71(1):37-42. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2018.71.1.37. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
6
Challenge to pediatric anatomical variation : Can we draw the ideal line on the pediatric I-gel?小儿解剖变异的挑战:我们能在小儿喉罩上画出理想的线条吗?
J Anesth. 2016 Apr;30(2):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2108-7. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
喉罩 SupremeTM 与喉罩 ProSealTM 在儿童中的随机比较
Anaesthesia. 2012 Jun;67(6):632-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07088.x. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
4
A randomised trial comparing the i-gel (TM) with the LMA Classic (TM) in children.一项比较 i-gel(TM)与 LMA Classic(TM)在儿童中应用的随机试验。
Anaesthesia. 2012 Jun;67(6):606-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07072.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
5
Initial experience of the i-gel supraglottic airway by the residents in pediatric patients.住院医师在小儿患者中使用 i-gel 声门上气道的初步经验。
J Anesth. 2012 Jun;26(3):357-61. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1322-1. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
6
The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway.1号ProSeal™喉罩气道用于婴儿:一项与Classic™喉罩气道对比的随机、非交叉研究。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Apr;22(4):365-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03801.x. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
7
Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery.在接受择期手术的自主呼吸儿童中,2号i-gel喉上气道与LMA-ProSeal™和LMA-Classic™的比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Apr;22(4):355-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03757.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
8
A cohort evaluation of the paediatric i-gel(™) airway during anaesthesia in 120 children.120 例小儿麻醉中儿科 i-gel(™)气道的队列评估。
Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66(12):1121-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06884.x. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
9
Performance of the pediatric-sized i-gel compared with the Ambu AuraOnce laryngeal mask in anesthetized and ventilated children.小儿型 i-gel 与 Ambu AuraOnce 喉罩在麻醉通气患儿中的应用比较。
Anesthesiology. 2011 Jul;115(1):102-10. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318219d619.
10
A clinical evaluation of the intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation in children.经口气管插管导丝型喉罩在小儿气管插管中的临床评价。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):176-82. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fe0408. Epub 2010 Nov 16.