• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于麻风病多药治疗中需改变治疗方案的药物不良反应的19年回顾性研究。

A 19-Year Retrospective Study of Adverse Drug Reactions to Multidrug Therapy in Leprosy Requiring a Change in Regime.

作者信息

Nair Sukumaran Pradeep

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Government Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Indian Dermatol Online J. 2018 Jan-Feb;9(1):33-36. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_116_17.

DOI:10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_116_17
PMID:29441295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5803939/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Multidrug therapy (MDT) in leprosy has brought the prevalence of leprosy to elimination levels. However, these drugs are not without toxicity. The primary aim of this study was to find the prevalence of adverse drug reactions (ADR) to MDT and the secondary aim to study the clinical features of these drug reactions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a19-year retrospective descriptive study of all new leprosy cases with ADR to MDT, requiring a change in regime.

RESULTS

There were 901 new leprosy cases in the study period. There were 28 cases of documented ADR to MDT necessitating a change in regime, thus accounting for a prevalence of 3.11%. There were 24 males (85.71%) and 4 females (14.29%) with a male/female ratio 6:1. Mean age was 39.58 years. Borderline tuberculoid was the commonest type of leprosy in which ADR were seen (46.43%). Dapsone was the commonest drug to cause ADR seen in 17 cases (60.71%). Hepatic involvement in the form of drug-induced hepatitis was the commonest presentation of ADR in this study accounting for 13 cases (46.43%), followed by skin rash, 9 cases (32.14%). There were no ADR reported to clofazimine. No ADR was reported to the alternative regimes given.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of ADRs was low in this study, with dapsone being the commonest drug. There were no adverse reactions to clofazimine. No adverse reactions were reported with the alternative regimes of ofloxacin and minocycline.

摘要

背景与目的

麻风病的多药联合治疗(MDT)已使麻风病患病率降至消除水平。然而,这些药物并非没有毒性。本研究的主要目的是确定MDT药物不良反应(ADR)的患病率,次要目的是研究这些药物反应的临床特征。

材料与方法

这是一项对所有因MDT发生ADR而需要改变治疗方案的新麻风病病例进行的19年回顾性描述性研究。

结果

研究期间共有901例新麻风病病例。有28例记录在案的MDT所致ADR需要改变治疗方案,患病率为3.11%。男性24例(85.71%),女性4例(14.29%),男女比例为6:1。平均年龄为39.58岁。界线类偏结核型是出现ADR最常见的麻风病类型(46.43%)。氨苯砜是导致ADR最常见的药物,17例(60.71%)。药物性肝炎形式的肝脏受累是本研究中ADR最常见的表现,占13例(46.43%),其次是皮疹,9例(32.14%)。未报告氯法齐明的ADR。也未报告所给予的替代治疗方案的ADR。

结论

本研究中ADR的患病率较低,氨苯砜是最常见的药物。未报告氯法齐明的不良反应。氧氟沙星和米诺环素的替代治疗方案也未报告不良反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f846/5803939/427e7953e3f6/IDOJ-9-33-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f846/5803939/77f7059ded4d/IDOJ-9-33-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f846/5803939/427e7953e3f6/IDOJ-9-33-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f846/5803939/77f7059ded4d/IDOJ-9-33-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f846/5803939/427e7953e3f6/IDOJ-9-33-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A 19-Year Retrospective Study of Adverse Drug Reactions to Multidrug Therapy in Leprosy Requiring a Change in Regime.一项关于麻风病多药治疗中需改变治疗方案的药物不良反应的19年回顾性研究。
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2018 Jan-Feb;9(1):33-36. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_116_17.
2
Adverse reactions induced by MDT/WHO (Rifampicin+Clofazimine+Dapsone) and ROM (Rifampicin+Ofloxacin+Minocycline) regimens used in the treatment of leprosy: a cohort study in a National Reference Center in Brazil.在巴西一家国家参考中心进行的队列研究:用于治疗麻风病的MDT/WHO(利福平+氯法齐明+氨苯砜)和ROM(利福平+氧氟沙星+米诺环素)方案引起的不良反应
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 7;15:1346169. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1346169. eCollection 2024.
3
Ofloxacin-Containing Multidrug Therapy in Ambulatory Leprosy Patients: A Case Series.门诊麻风病患者含氧氟沙星的多药联合治疗:病例系列
J Cutan Med Surg. 2021 Jan-Feb;25(1):45-52. doi: 10.1177/1203475420952437. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
4
Adverse effects of alternative therapy (minocycline, ofloxacin, and clofazimine) in multibacillary leprosy patients in a recognized health care unit in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.巴西亚马孙州玛瑙斯市一家知名医疗机构中多菌型麻风病患者使用替代疗法(米诺环素、氧氟沙星和氯法齐明)的不良反应。
An Bras Dermatol. 2013 Mar-Apr;88(2):205-10. doi: 10.1590/S0365-05962013000200003.
5
Daily multidrug therapy for leprosy; results of a fourteen-year experience.麻风病的每日多药疗法;十四年经验结果
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1997 Mar;65(1):37-44.
6
Adverse reactions in leprosy patients who underwent dapsone multidrug therapy: a retrospective study.接受氨苯砜联合化疗的麻风病患者的不良反应:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jun 29;9:73-78. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S135846. eCollection 2017.
7
Hepatic and haematological adverse reactions associated with the use of multidrug therapy in leprosy--a five year retrospective study.麻风病联合化疗相关肝脏及血液学不良反应——一项五年回顾性研究
Indian J Lepr. 2001 Apr-Jun;73(2):121-9.
8
Efficacy and safety of multidrug therapy in paucibacillary leprosy in Singapore.新加坡多药联合疗法治疗少菌型麻风的疗效与安全性。
Lepr Rev. 1993 Jun;64(2):136-42. doi: 10.5935/0305-7518.19930016.
9
Parallel assessment of 24 monthly doses of rifampin, ofloxacin, and minocycline versus two years of World Health Organization multi-drug therapy for multi-bacillary leprosy.对24个月度剂量的利福平、氧氟沙星和米诺环素与世界卫生组织针对多菌型麻风病的两年多药疗法进行平行评估。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Feb;70(2):197-200.
10
Effectiveness of multidrug therapy in multibacillary leprosy: a long-term follow-up of 34 multibacillary leprosy patients treated with multidrug regimens till skin smear negativity.多药联合疗法治疗多菌型麻风的疗效:对34例接受多药联合方案治疗直至皮肤涂片转阴的多菌型麻风患者的长期随访
Lepr Rev. 2003 Jun;74(2):141-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse reactions induced by MDT/WHO (Rifampicin+Clofazimine+Dapsone) and ROM (Rifampicin+Ofloxacin+Minocycline) regimens used in the treatment of leprosy: a cohort study in a National Reference Center in Brazil.在巴西一家国家参考中心进行的队列研究:用于治疗麻风病的MDT/WHO(利福平+氯法齐明+氨苯砜)和ROM(利福平+氧氟沙星+米诺环素)方案引起的不良反应
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 7;15:1346169. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1346169. eCollection 2024.
2
Response to "Three drugs are unnecessary for treating paucibacillary leprosy-A critique of the WHO guidelines".对《治疗少菌型麻风病无需三种药物——对世界卫生组织指南的批评》的回应
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Jun 4;14(6):e0008169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008169. eCollection 2020 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
A Study of Liver Function Tests in leprosy.麻风病肝功能检查的研究
Indian J Lepr. 2014 Oct-Dec;86(4):155-9.
2
Adverse effects of multi-drug therapy in leprosy, a two years' experience (2006-2008) in tertiary health care centre in the tribal region of Chhattisgarh State (Bastar, Jagdalpur).麻风病多药联合治疗的不良反应:在恰蒂斯加尔邦部落地区(巴斯塔尔,贾格达普尔)三级医疗中心的两年经验(2006 - 2008年)
Lepr Rev. 2011 Mar;82(1):17-24.
3
Pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of newer anti -leprosy drugs.新型抗麻风病药物的药代动力学及药物相互作用
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1997 May-Jun;63(3):148-52.
4
Adverse effects from multi-drug therapy in leprosy: a Brazilian study.麻风病多药治疗的不良反应:一项巴西的研究。
Lepr Rev. 2007 Sep;78(3):216-22.
5
A study of dapsone syndrome at a rural teaching hospital in South India.印度南部一家乡村教学医院的氨苯砜综合征研究。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2001 Mar-Apr;67(2):69-71.
6
Hepatic involvement and hepatitis B surface antigen (Hbs Ag) in leprosy.麻风病中的肝脏受累与乙肝表面抗原(Hbs Ag)
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2003 Jan-Feb;69(1):32-4.
7
Dapsone syndrome in Goa.果阿邦的氨苯砜综合征。
Indian J Lepr. 1994 Jan-Mar;66(1):59-64.
8
Are hypersensitivity reactions to dapsone becoming more frequent?对氨苯砜的过敏反应是否变得更加频繁?
Lepr Rev. 1988 Mar;59(1):53-8. doi: 10.5935/0305-7518.19880009.
9
Increased incidence in leprosy of hypersensitivity reactions to dapsone after introduction of multidrug therapy.采用联合化疗后,麻风病患者对氨苯砜过敏反应的发生率增加。
Lepr Rev. 1989 Dec;60(4):267-73. doi: 10.5935/0305-7518.19890033.