Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
Exercise Science Department, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina.
J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol. 2017 Nov;327(9):551-561. doi: 10.1002/jez.2141. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
Broad similarities in the timing of jaw adductor activity driving jaw movements across distantly related and morphologically disparate species have led to the hypothesis that mammalian masticatory motor patterns are conserved. However, some quantitative analyses also suggest that masticatory motor patterns have evolved in concert with dietary and/or morphological specialization. Here, we assess this relationship in two closely related carnivoran species with divergent diets and morphology: carnivorous ferrets and frugivorous kinkajous. Using electromyography to characterize jaw adductor activity during rhythmic mastication, we test the hypotheses that (1) carnivoran masticatory motor patterns differ from those of non-carnivorans based on previously published data, and (2) differences between ferret and kinkajou motor patterns are associated with dietary and morphological differences. We find that both species exhibit highly synchronous jaw adductor activity that is likely typical of most carnivorans. Kinkajous differ from ferrets, however, in having a balancing-side zygomaticomandibularis that is active later than all other adductors. The significance of these different masticatory motor patterns may relate to morphological differences in the dentition of ferrets and kinkajous. Whereas ferret cheek teeth have vertical occlusal surfaces that limit jaw closing to a primarily dorsally directed movement, kinkajous have relatively flat occlusal surfaces that allow more transverse movement, which may be essential for processing fruits. Our results suggest that some aspects of masticatory motor patterns are highly conserved yet some components are modified in concert with functional and morphological evolution of the masticatory apparatus.
在亲缘关系较远且形态差异较大的物种中,颌内收肌活动的时间同步性驱动颌运动的情况非常相似,这导致了哺乳动物咀嚼运动模式保守的假说。然而,一些定量分析也表明,咀嚼运动模式与饮食和/或形态特化协同进化。在这里,我们评估了两种具有不同饮食和形态的密切相关的食肉动物物种之间的这种关系:肉食性雪貂和食果性蜜熊。我们使用肌电图来描述节律性咀嚼过程中的颌内收肌活动,以检验以下两个假设:(1) 基于先前发表的数据,食肉动物的咀嚼运动模式与非食肉动物不同;(2) 雪貂和蜜熊运动模式之间的差异与饮食和形态差异有关。我们发现,这两个物种都表现出高度同步的颌内收肌活动,这可能是大多数食肉动物的典型特征。然而,与雪貂不同的是,蜜熊的颧颌肌在所有其他内收肌之后活动,起到平衡作用。这些不同咀嚼运动模式的意义可能与雪貂和蜜熊牙齿形态的差异有关。雪貂的颊齿具有垂直的咬合面,限制了颌的闭合运动主要向背侧方向进行,而蜜熊的咬合面相对平坦,允许更多的横向运动,这对于处理水果可能至关重要。我们的结果表明,咀嚼运动模式的某些方面高度保守,但某些成分与咀嚼器官的功能和形态进化协同改变。