Grimmsmann Thomas, Harden Markus, Fiß Thomas, Himmel Wolfgang
German Health Insurance Medical Service (MDK) Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Schwerin, Germany.
Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Centre, Göttingen, Germany.
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Feb 14;148:w14590. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14590. eCollection 2018.
Hospitalisation influences drug therapy in ambulatory care and this influence is generally negatively perceived. The few studies that have explored changes in benzodiazepine or sleep medication use as a function of hospitalisation failed to precisely determine the hospital's role in initiating, continuing and discontinuing these drugs on a valid basis. The aim of the study was to ascertain the overall influence of hospitalisation on the prescription of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in outpatient care with a special focus on the role of different hospital departments and drug classes.
In a secondary data analysis, we used prescription data for 181 037 patients who visited 127 hospitals and compared the numbers of patients with prescriptions of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs 50 days before and 50 or 100 days after hospitalisation.
The proportion of patients who received benzodiazepines or Z-drugs increased from 3.1% before admission to 3.6% at 50 days after discharge and fell to the former level after an additional 50 days. A multivariable logistic regression showed that gender and department had an additional impact on these results. Of those patients without a prescription for a benzodiazepine or Z-drug before admission, 0.6% received a prescription in both time-windows after discharge. Of those patients who were prescribed a benzodiazepine, 38.0% received short-acting substances and 40.3% received long-acting substances before hospitalisation. After hospitalisation, these rates changed to favour short-acting substances (44.4% and 34.4%, respectively).
The hospital effect on initiating and increasing hypnotic or sedative drug use seems to be only moderate and temporary. A change in favour of short-acting substances is even welcome. In less than 1% of patients, the hospital initiated the continuous use of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs, which may put pressure on primary care physicians. However, the widespread use of these drugs in hospitals does not seem to be continued on a large scale in primary care.
住院会影响门诊医疗中的药物治疗,且这种影响通常被视为负面。少数探讨苯二氮䓬类药物或助眠药物使用情况随住院而变化的研究,未能在有效基础上精确确定医院在起始、持续和停用这些药物方面的作用。本研究的目的是确定住院对门诊医疗中苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物处方的总体影响,特别关注不同医院科室和药物类别的作用。
在一项二次数据分析中,我们使用了127家医院181037名患者的处方数据,比较了住院前50天以及住院后50天或100天开具苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物处方的患者数量。
接受苯二氮䓬类药物或Z类药物治疗的患者比例从入院前的3.1%增加至出院后50天的3.6%,再过50天后又降至先前水平。多变量逻辑回归显示,性别和科室对这些结果有额外影响。在入院前未开具苯二氮䓬类药物或Z类药物处方的患者中,0.6%在出院后的两个时间窗内都接受了处方。在那些开具了苯二氮䓬类药物处方的患者中,38.0%在住院前接受短效药物治疗,40.3%接受长效药物治疗。住院后,这些比例变为更倾向于短效药物(分别为44.4%和34.4%)。
医院对起始和增加催眠或镇静药物使用的影响似乎只是适度且暂时的。更倾向于短效药物的变化甚至是受欢迎的。不到1%的患者因住院而开始持续使用苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物,这可能给初级保健医生带来压力。然而,这些药物在医院的广泛使用似乎在初级保健中并未大规模持续下去。