Agarwal Suresh K, Cloyd James C
Center for Orphan Drug Research, Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2015 Feb;5(1):80-85. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000099.
Management of seizure emergencies substantially changed after the introduction of rectal diazepam in Europe in the 1970s and in the United States in the 1990s. Although safe and effective, social objections and legal concerns have limited use of rectal diazepam products in out-of-hospital treatment of seizure emergencies. Shortly after the introduction of Diastat (diazepam rectal gel), commercial development of innovative formulations began involving several benzodiazepines and routes of administration, including buccal, IM, nasal, and subcutaneous. All benzodiazepines have the same mechanism of action; however, there are major differences in physicochemical properties and pharmacokinetic characteristics, which affect the choice of drug and route. This article highlights some of those differences and their effect on selection of therapies for treating seizure emergencies. We also present results from key clinical studies of these drugs and provide an update on current status of new products under development.
20世纪70年代直肠用安定在欧洲推出以及20世纪90年代在美国推出后,癫痫紧急情况的管理发生了重大变化。尽管直肠用安定安全有效,但社会反对意见和法律担忧限制了其在癫痫紧急情况院外治疗中的使用。在Diastat(地西泮直肠凝胶)推出后不久,创新制剂的商业开发就开始涉及多种苯二氮䓬类药物和给药途径,包括颊内、肌内、鼻内和皮下给药。所有苯二氮䓬类药物都具有相同的作用机制;然而,它们在物理化学性质和药代动力学特征方面存在重大差异,这会影响药物和给药途径的选择。本文重点介绍了其中一些差异及其对癫痫紧急情况治疗方法选择的影响。我们还展示了这些药物关键临床研究的结果,并提供了正在开发的新产品的最新情况。