• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后腹膜后出血:英国心血管介入学会记录的发生率、决定因素和结果。

Retroperitoneal Hemorrhage After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Determinants, and Outcomes as Recorded by the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.

机构信息

From the Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute for Applied Clinical Sciences and Centre for Prognosis Research, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom (C.S.K., J.P., M.R., A.S., J.N., R.B., M.A.M.); Academic Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom (C.S.K., A.S., J.N., M.A.M.); Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom (E.K.); Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom (T.K.); The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom (M.A.d.B.); and Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom (P.L.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb;11(2):e005866. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005866.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005866
PMID:29445000
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal hemorrhage (RH) is a rare bleeding complication of percutaneous coronary intervention, which can result as a consequence of femoral access or can occur spontaneously. This study aims to evaluate temporal changes in RH, its predictors, and clinical outcomes in a national cohort of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United Kingdom.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed RH events in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between 2007 and 2014. Multiple logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with RH and to quantify the association between RH and 30-day mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. A total of 511 106 participants were included, and 291 in hospital RH events were recorded (0.06%). Overall, rates of RH declined from 0.09% to 0.03% between 2007 and 2014. The strongest independent predictors of RH events were femoral access (odds ratio [OR], 19.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.22-34.43), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.99-3.47), and warfarin use (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.07-5.99). RH was associated with a significant increase in 30-day mortality (OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 2.19-5.90) and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 5.76; 95% CI, 3.71-8.95). A legacy effect was not observed; patients with RH who survived 30 days did not have higher 1-year mortality compared with those without this complication (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.49-1.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that RH is a rare event that is declining in the United Kingdom, related to transition to transradial access site utilization, but remains a clinically important event associated with increased 30-day mortality but no long-term legacy effect.

摘要

背景

腹膜后出血(RH)是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗罕见的出血并发症,可由股动脉入路引起,也可自发性发生。本研究旨在评估英国全国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者队列中 RH 的时间变化、其预测因素以及临床结局。

方法和结果

我们分析了 2007 年至 2014 年间接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的 RH 事件。使用多因素逻辑回归模型确定与 RH 相关的因素,并量化 RH 与 30 天死亡率和主要心血管不良事件之间的关联。共纳入 511106 例患者,记录了 291 例住院 RH 事件(0.06%)。总体而言,RH 发生率从 2007 年至 2014 年从 0.09%降至 0.03%。RH 事件的最强独立预测因素为股动脉入路(比值比 [OR],19.66;95%置信区间 [CI],11.22-34.43)、糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂(OR,2.63;95%CI,1.99-3.47)和华法林的使用(OR,2.53;95%CI,1.07-5.99)。RH 与 30 天死亡率显著增加相关(OR,3.59;95%CI,2.19-5.90)和住院期间主要心血管不良事件(OR,5.76;95%CI,3.71-8.95)。未观察到遗留效应;30 天存活的 RH 患者与无此并发症的患者相比,1 年死亡率无升高(风险比,0.97;95%CI,0.49-1.91)。

结论

我们的结果表明,RH 是一种罕见的事件,在英国呈下降趋势,与向经桡动脉入路的转变有关,但仍然是一个与 30 天死亡率增加相关的重要临床事件,但无长期遗留效应。

相似文献

1
Retroperitoneal Hemorrhage After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Determinants, and Outcomes as Recorded by the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后腹膜后出血:英国心血管介入学会记录的发生率、决定因素和结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb;11(2):e005866. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005866.
2
Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中动脉入路选择对结果的影响:随机临床试验的结果能否在临床实践中实现?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul;6(7):698-706. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.011. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
3
Incidence, Determinants, and Outcomes of Left and Right Radial Access Use in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United Kingdom: A National Perspective Using the BCIS Dataset.英国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者左、右桡动脉入路使用的发生率、决定因素和结果:使用 BCIS 数据集的全国视角。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun 11;11(11):1021-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.252. Epub 2018 May 16.
4
Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset.英国经溶栓治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中穿刺部位操作对临床结局的影响:来自英国心血管介入学会数据集的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 27;10(22):2258-2265. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.049.
5
Access Site and Outcomes for Unprotected Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database.无保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的入路和结果:英国心血管介入学会数据库分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 24;11(24):2480-2491. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.035.
6
Relationship Between Femoral Vascular Closure Devices and Short-Term Mortality From 271 845 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures Performed in the United Kingdom Between 2006 and 2011: A Propensity Score-Corrected Analysis From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.2006年至2011年在英国进行的271845例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中股动脉血管闭合装置与短期死亡率的关系:来自英国心血管介入学会的倾向评分校正分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003560.
7
Arterial access site and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with and without vorapaxar.接受或未接受vorapaxar的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的动脉穿刺部位及治疗结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug;88(2):163-73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26335. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
8
Transradial vs. Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With or Without High Bleeding Risk Criteria.经桡动脉与经股动脉入路行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴有或不伴有高出血风险标准的患者。
Circ J. 2020 Apr 24;84(5):723-732. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1117. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
9
Vascular Access Site and Outcomes in 58,870 Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Previous History of Coronary Bypass Surgery: Results From the British Cardiovascular Interventions Society National Database.58870 例行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中血管入路部位和结局的研究:来自英国心血管介入学会国家数据库的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 12;11(5):482-492. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.12.020.
10
Outcomes of Transradial PCI compared to Transfemoral PCI in veterans with anemia: Insight from the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking (CART) program.退伍军人贫血患者经桡动脉与经股动脉冠状动脉介入治疗的结局:来自退伍军人事务部临床评估、报告和跟踪(CART)项目的见解
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Nov;20(11):990-996. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Brachial artery approach for managing retroperitoneal bleed following coronary intervention for STEMI.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死冠状动脉介入术后腹膜后出血的肱动脉处理方法
Br J Cardiol. 2023 Nov 29;30(4):45. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2023.045. eCollection 2023.
2
Contemporary Techniques for Femoral and Radial Arterial Access in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.心脏导管实验室中股动脉和桡动脉穿刺的当代技术。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 14;23(9):316. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2309316. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Era.
经导管主动脉瓣植入时代的球囊主动脉瓣成形术
Heart Int. 2023 Jun 22;17(1):13-18. doi: 10.17925/HI.2023.17.1.13. eCollection 2023.
4
Femoral Access-Site Complications with Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large-Vessel-Occlusion Stroke.替奈普酶与阿替普酶在机械取栓治疗大血管闭塞性卒中前经股动脉入路并发症比较。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Jun;44(6):681-686. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7862. Epub 2023 May 11.
5
Analysis of the Common Femoral Artery and Vein: Anatomical Morphology, Vessel Relationship, and Factors Affecting Vessel Size.股动脉和股静脉的分析:解剖形态学、血管关系和影响血管大小的因素。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 21;58(2):325. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020325.
6
Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on the Incidence and Management of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Patients Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction in England.新型冠状病毒病 2019 大流行对英格兰因急性心肌梗死而出现院外心脏骤停患者的发生率和处理的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Nov 17;9(22):e018379. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018379. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
7
Cross-sectional study of retroperitoneal hematoma after invasive intervention in a Chinese population: Prevalence, characteristics, management and outcomes.中国人群侵入性干预后腹膜后血肿的横断面研究:患病率、特征、管理及结果
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Oct;20(4):2975-2984. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9040. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
8
Adoption of same day discharge following elective left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention.择期左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后当天出院的采用。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Dec 15;321:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.07.038. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
9
Acute postoperative delayed hemorrhage following anterior colporrhaphy and cystoscopy: A case report and a review of the literature.阴道前壁修补术和膀胱镜检查术后急性延迟性出血:一例病例报告及文献综述
Case Rep Womens Health. 2020 May 22;27:e00224. doi: 10.1016/j.crwh.2020.e00224. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Endovascular management of femoral access-site and access-related vascular complications following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后股动脉入路部位及相关血管并发症的血管内处理。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 19;15(3):e0230535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230535. eCollection 2020.