• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A combined test for a generalized treatment effect in clinical trials with a time-to-event outcome.针对具有事件发生时间结局的临床试验中广义治疗效果的联合检验。
Stata J. 2017 Apr;17(2):405-421.
2
Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated.在可能预期治疗效果存在非比例风险的临床试验设计中增强对数秩检验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 11;16:16. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0110-x.
3
A unified approach to power and sample size determination for log-rank tests under proportional and nonproportional hazards.比例和非比例风险下对数秩检验的功效和样本量确定的统一方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 May;30(5):1211-1234. doi: 10.1177/0962280220988570. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
4
Empirical power comparison of statistical tests in contemporary phase III randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes in oncology.肿瘤学中以时间为事件的当代 III 期随机对照试验中统计检验的经验功效比较。
Clin Trials. 2020 Dec;17(6):597-606. doi: 10.1177/1740774520940256. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
5
Comparison of the restricted mean survival time with the hazard ratio in superiority trials with a time-to-event end point.在具有事件发生时间终点的优效性试验中,受限平均生存时间与风险比的比较。
Pharm Stat. 2018 May;17(3):202-213. doi: 10.1002/pst.1846. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Are non-constant rates and non-proportional treatment effects accounted for in the design and analysis of randomised controlled trials? A review of current practice.随机对照试验的设计和分析中是否考虑了非恒定率和非比例治疗效果?对当前实践的回顾。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 May 16;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0749-1.
8
A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Time-To-Event Analyses in Randomized Controlled Trials Under Non-Proportional Hazards.非比例风险下随机对照试验中事件发生时间分析的统计方法比较
Stat Med. 2025 Feb 28;44(5):e70019. doi: 10.1002/sim.70019.
9
Complex survival trial design by the product integration method.采用产品整合方法的复杂生存试验设计。
Stat Med. 2022 Feb 20;41(4):798-814. doi: 10.1002/sim.9256. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
10
On Sample Size Determination for Augmented Tests Based on Restricted Mean Survival Time in Randomized Clinical Trials.基于随机临床试验中受限平均生存时间的增强检验的样本量确定
Biom J. 2025 Apr;67(2):e70046. doi: 10.1002/bimj.70046.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining evidence of time-dependent treatment effects: an illustration using regression methods.考察时依性治疗效果的证据:使用回归方法的说明。
Trials. 2022 Oct 6;23(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06803-x.
2
Which test for crossing survival curves? A user's guideline.哪种检验方法适用于比较生存曲线?使用指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 30;22(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01520-0.
3
Impact of a non-constant baseline hazard on detection of time-dependent treatment effects: a simulation study.非恒定基线风险对时间依赖性治疗效果检测的影响:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Aug 28;21(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01372-0.
4
A community-based intervention to prevent serious complications and death 2 years after discharge in people with spinal cord injury in Bangladesh (CIVIC): a randomised trial.孟加拉国脊髓损伤患者出院后 2 年预防严重并发症和死亡的基于社区的干预措施(CIVIC):一项随机试验。
Spinal Cord. 2021 Jun;59(6):649-658. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-00546-9. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
5
Community-based interventions to prevent serious complications following spinal cord injury in Bangladesh: the CIVIC trial statistical analysis plan.基于社区的干预措施以预防孟加拉国脊髓损伤后的严重并发症:CIVIC 试验统计分析计划。
Trials. 2019 Apr 25;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3181-2.
6
Combined test versus logrank/Cox test in 50 randomised trials.50项随机试验中联合检验与对数秩检验/考克斯检验的比较
Trials. 2019 Mar 18;20(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3251-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Treatment Effects Measured by the Hazard Ratio and by the Ratio of Restricted Mean Survival Times in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials.肿瘤学随机对照试验中风险比和受限平均生存时间比测量的治疗效果比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 20;34(15):1813-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2488. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
2
Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated.在可能预期治疗效果存在非比例风险的临床试验设计中增强对数秩检验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 11;16:16. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0110-x.
3
Penicillin to prevent recurrent leg cellulitis.青霉素预防腿部蜂窝织炎复发。
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 2;368(18):1695-703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206300.
4
Regression analysis of restricted mean survival time based on pseudo-observations.基于伪观测值的受限平均生存时间回归分析。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2004 Dec;10(4):335-50. doi: 10.1007/s10985-004-4771-0.
5
Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects.用于删失生存数据的灵活参数比例风险模型和比例优势模型及其在预后建模和治疗效果估计中的应用
Stat Med. 2002 Aug 15;21(15):2175-97. doi: 10.1002/sim.1203.

针对具有事件发生时间结局的临床试验中广义治疗效果的联合检验。

A combined test for a generalized treatment effect in clinical trials with a time-to-event outcome.

作者信息

Royston Patrick

机构信息

MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Stata J. 2017 Apr;17(2):405-421.

PMID:29445320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5808831/
Abstract

Most randomized controlled trials with a time-to-event outcome are designed and analyzed assuming proportional hazards of the treatment effect. The sample-size calculation is based on a log-rank test or the equivalent Cox test. Nonproportional hazards are seen increasingly in trials and are recognized as a potential threat to the power of the log-rank test. To address the issue, Royston and Parmar (2016, 16: 16) devised a new "combined test" of the global null hypothesis of identical survival curves in each trial arm. The test, which combines the conventional Cox test with a new formulation, is based on the maximal standardized difference in restricted mean survival time (rmst) between the arms. The test statistic is based on evaluations of rmst over several preselected time points. The combined test involves the minimum -value across the Cox and rmst-based tests, appropriately standardized to have the correct null distribution. In this article, I outline the combined test and introduce a command, stctest, that implements the combined test. I point the way to additional tools currently under development for power and sample-size calculation for the combined test.

摘要

大多数具有事件发生时间结局的随机对照试验在设计和分析时都假定治疗效果的风险比例恒定。样本量计算基于对数秩检验或等效的Cox检验。在试验中,非比例风险越来越常见,并被认为是对数秩检验效能的潜在威胁。为解决这一问题,Royston和Parmar(2016年,第16卷,第16期)设计了一种新的“联合检验”,用于检验每个试验组中生存曲线相同这一全局零假设。该检验将传统的Cox检验与一种新的公式相结合,基于两组间受限平均生存时间(rmst)的最大标准化差异。检验统计量基于在几个预先选定的时间点对rmst的评估。联合检验涉及Cox检验和基于rmst的检验中的最小值,并进行适当标准化以使其具有正确的零分布。在本文中,我概述了联合检验,并介绍了一个实现联合检验的命令stctest。我还指出了目前正在开发的用于联合检验效能和样本量计算的其他工具。