Wang Rui-Rui, Wang Yan, Guan Su-Min, Li Zhen, Kokane Saurabh, Cao Fa-Le, Sun Wei, Li Chun-Li, He Ting, Yang Yan, Lin Qing, Chen Jun
Institute for Biomedical Sciences of Pain, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Key Laboratory of Brain Stress and Behavior, People's Liberation Army, Xi'an, China.
Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2018 Jan 31;10:1. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2018.00001. eCollection 2018.
It has been generally accepted that pain can cause imbalance between excitation and inhibition (homeostasis) at the synaptic level. However, it remains poorly understood how this imbalance (allostasis) develops in the CNS under different pain conditions. Here, we analyzed the changes in both excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission and modulation of the dentate gyrus (DG) under two pain conditions with different etiology and duration. First, it was revealed that the functions of the input-output (I/O) curves for evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (eEPSCs) following the perforant path (PP) stimulation were gained under both acute inflammatory and chronic neuropathic pain conditions relative to the controls. However, the functions of I/O curves for the PP-evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (eIPSCs) differed between the two conditions, namely it was greatly gained under inflammatory condition, but was reduced under neuropathic condition in reverse. Second, both the frequency and amplitude of miniature IPSCs (mIPSCs) were increased under inflammatory condition, however a decrease in frequency of mIPSCs was observed under neuropathic condition. Finally, the spike discharge of the DG granule cells in response to current injection was significantly increased by neuropathic pain condition, however, no different change was found between inflammatory pain condition and the control. These results provide another line of evidence showing homeostatic and allostatic modulation of excitatory synaptic transmission by inhibitory controls under different pathological pain conditions, hence implicating use of different therapeutic approaches to maintain the homeostasis between excitation and inhibition while treating different conditions of pathological pain.
人们普遍认为,疼痛可在突触水平导致兴奋与抑制(内稳态)失衡。然而,对于这种失衡(异稳态)在中枢神经系统(CNS)中如何在不同疼痛条件下发展,我们仍知之甚少。在此,我们分析了在两种病因和持续时间不同的疼痛条件下,齿状回(DG)的兴奋性和抑制性突触传递及调制的变化。首先,研究发现,与对照组相比,在急性炎症性疼痛和慢性神经性疼痛条件下,穿通通路(PP)刺激诱发的兴奋性突触后电流(eEPSCs)的输入-输出(I/O)曲线功能均增强。然而,两种条件下PP诱发的抑制性突触后电流(eIPSCs)的I/O曲线功能有所不同,即在炎症条件下大幅增强,而在神经性疼痛条件下则相反减弱。其次,微小抑制性突触后电流(mIPSCs)的频率和幅度在炎症条件下均增加,但在神经性疼痛条件下观察到mIPSCs频率降低。最后,神经性疼痛条件下,DG颗粒细胞对电流注入的放电显著增加,然而,炎症性疼痛条件与对照组之间未发现差异变化。这些结果提供了另一系列证据,表明在不同病理性疼痛条件下,通过抑制性控制对兴奋性突触传递进行稳态和异稳态调制,因此意味着在治疗不同病理性疼痛条件时,应采用不同的治疗方法来维持兴奋与抑制之间的内稳态。