Suppr超能文献

采用序贯解释性混合方法评估脆性骨折后开始骨质疏松症治疗的治疗窗机会。

Using a sequential explanatory mixed method to evaluate the therapeutic window of opportunity for initiating osteoporosis treatment following fragility fractures.

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie-Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS), Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2018 Apr;29(4):961-971. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4374-8. Epub 2018 Feb 14.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Interventions targeting patients with recent fragility fracture and their physician were most successful at initiating osteoporosis treatment during the first 12 months. This window of opportunity had already closed after 1 year. The reasons for declining or accepting the intensive intervention were explored in patients still untreated at 12 months.

INTRODUCTION

A fragility fracture (FF) event identifies patients most likely to benefit from osteoporosis treatment. Nonetheless, most FF patients go untreated. Our objective was to determine how long an incident FF remains a strong incentive to initiate osteoporosis treatment.

METHODS

A total of 1086 men and women over age 50 with a recent FF event were assigned to either standard care (SC), to minimal (MIN), or intensive (INT) interventions targeting patients and their family physician to initiate osteoporosis treatment. Inpatients with FF (mainly hip) evaluated by rheumatologists were also included in a specialized group (SPE; n = 324). At 1 year, untreated patients in both the SC and the MIN groups were offered an INT intervention. The cohort was followed through 48 months. A qualitative analysis of patient-centered decision-making associated with initiation of treatment was conducted.

RESULTS

In MIN and INT groups, osteoporosis treatment was initiated in 41.0 and 54.3% of untreated patients by 12 months, respectively, compared to 68.4% in SPE and 18.9% in SC groups; initiation rates drastically dropped thereafter. Over 4863 patient-years of follow-up, the rates of new FF were 3.4 per 100 patient-years, without significant differences between patients with initial major or minor FF, nor between control or intervention groups. Failure by patients and physicians to recognize FF as a sign of underlying bone disease contributed the most to lack of treatment.

CONCLUSION

While incident FFs are an ideal opportunity for starting osteoporosis treatment, 1 year later, the therapeutic window of opportunity has already closed.

摘要

目的

研究目标人群为近期发生脆性骨折(FF)的患者及其医生,本研究旨在确定在初始 12 个月内,针对该人群的干预措施在启动骨质疏松治疗方面最为成功。这一机会之窗在 1 年后已经关闭。本研究旨在探讨 12 个月时仍未接受治疗的患者中,拒绝或接受强化干预的原因。

简介

脆性骨折(FF)的发生提示患者最有可能从骨质疏松治疗中获益。然而,大多数 FF 患者并未接受治疗。本研究的目的是确定发生脆性骨折后,多长时间内仍然是启动骨质疏松治疗的强烈动力。

方法

共纳入 1086 名年龄在 50 岁以上、近期发生脆性骨折的男性和女性患者,将其随机分为标准护理(SC)组、最小干预(MIN)组或强化干预(INT)组,旨在启动患者及其家庭医生的骨质疏松治疗。也纳入了由风湿病学家评估的脆性骨折(主要为髋部骨折)住院患者进入专门组(SPE;n=324)。在 1 年时,SC 和 MIN 组中未接受治疗的患者被提供 INT 干预。该队列随访至 48 个月。进行了以患者为中心的决策制定的定性分析,以启动治疗。

结果

在 MIN 和 INT 组中,分别有 41.0%和 54.3%的未接受治疗患者在 12 个月内开始接受骨质疏松治疗,而 SPE 组为 68.4%,SC 组为 18.9%;此后,启动率急剧下降。在超过 4863 患者年的随访中,新发脆性骨折的发生率为每 100 患者年 3.4 例,初始为主要或次要脆性骨折的患者之间,以及对照组和干预组之间均无显著差异。患者和医生未能将脆性骨折识别为潜在骨病的迹象,是导致治疗不足的最主要原因。

结论

虽然新发脆性骨折是启动骨质疏松治疗的理想机会,但 1 年后,机会之窗已经关闭。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验