• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国骨折联络计划中的实践模式和表现:来自“拥有骨骼”计划的超过 32000 名患者的分析。

Practice Patterns and Performance in U.S. Fracture Liaison Programs: An Analysis of >32,000 Patients from the Own the Bone Program.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago School of Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois.

College of Osteopathic Medicine, Des Moines University, Des Moines, Iowa.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Apr 18;100(8):680-685. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00665.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.17.00665
PMID:29664856
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We are not aware of any previous investigation assessing a national cohort of patients enrolled in a fracture liaison service (FLS) program in an open health-care system to ascertain prevalent practice patterns. The objective of this investigation was to determine, in a geographically diverse group of centers in a single FLS program, the percentage of patients for whom anti-osteoporosis treatment was recommended or started as well as to identify associations between patient and fracture variables and the likelihood of treatment being recommended.

METHODS

The study utilized the Own the Bone program registry, which included 32,671 unique patient records with the required data. The primary outcome measure was whether a recommendation to start anti-osteoporosis treatment was made to the patient at the time of program enrollment. The associations between patient and fracture variables and the likelihood of having treatment recommended were calculated.

RESULTS

Anti-osteoporosis treatment was recommended to 72.8% of patients and was initiated for 12.1%. A sedentary lifestyle and a parent who had sustained a hip fracture increased the likelihood of a treatment recommendation by 10% and 12%, respectively. While patients with a spinal fracture were 11% more likely to have received a treatment recommendation, those with a hip fracture were 2% less likely to have received such a recommendation. Age was not strongly associated with the likelihood of receiving a treatment recommendation but was associated with the initiation of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Practitioners at sites in the Own the Bone program recommend anti-osteoporosis treatment, at the time of initial evaluation, to about three-quarters of patients who present with a fragility fracture. This is a very strong improvement over previously reported national data. The findings that a hip fracture had the lowest association and age had very little association with the likelihood of recommending treatment were unexpected and perhaps deserve further investigation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

FLS programs and sites as well as all those who manage patients with a fragility fracture can utilize the information derived from this study to improve practice patterns for the care of these patients.

摘要

背景

我们不清楚之前是否有研究评估在开放医疗体系中参与骨折联络服务(FLS)项目的全国患者队列,以确定普遍的实践模式。本研究的目的是在单一 FLS 项目中地理分布多样化的中心确定有多少患者被建议或开始接受抗骨质疏松治疗,并确定患者和骨折变量与治疗建议可能性之间的关联。

方法

本研究利用了 Own the Bone 项目的注册登记系统,其中包含 32671 名具有所需数据的独特患者记录。主要结局指标是在项目入组时是否向患者提出开始抗骨质疏松治疗的建议。计算了患者和骨折变量与治疗建议可能性之间的关联。

结果

72.8%的患者被建议接受抗骨质疏松治疗,其中 12.1%开始接受治疗。久坐的生活方式和父母曾发生髋部骨折分别使治疗建议的可能性增加了 10%和 12%。脊柱骨折患者接受治疗建议的可能性增加了 11%,而髋部骨折患者接受治疗建议的可能性降低了 2%。年龄与接受治疗建议的可能性没有很强的关联,但与开始治疗有关。

结论

Own the Bone 项目中各站点的医生在对初次就诊的脆性骨折患者进行评估时,约有四分之三的患者建议接受抗骨质疏松治疗。这与之前报告的全国数据相比有很大的改善。髋部骨折与治疗建议可能性的关联最低,而年龄与治疗建议可能性的关联非常小,这些发现出人意料,可能需要进一步研究。

临床相关性

FLS 项目和站点以及所有管理脆性骨折患者的人员都可以利用本研究得出的信息来改善这些患者的护理实践模式。

相似文献

1
Practice Patterns and Performance in U.S. Fracture Liaison Programs: An Analysis of >32,000 Patients from the Own the Bone Program.美国骨折联络计划中的实践模式和表现:来自“拥有骨骼”计划的超过 32000 名患者的分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Apr 18;100(8):680-685. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00665.
2
Declining rates of osteoporosis management following fragility fractures in the U.S., 2000 through 2009.美国 2000 年至 2009 年脆性骨折后骨质疏松症管理率下降。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):e52. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01781.
3
Implementing a fracture liaison service open model of care utilizing a cloud-based tool.利用基于云的工具实施骨折联络服务开放式护理模式。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Apr;29(4):953-960. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4371-y. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
4
Breaking the cycle of recurrent fracture: implementing the first fracture liaison service (FLS) in British Columbia, Canada.打破反复骨折的循环:在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省实施首个骨折联络服务(FLS)。
Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Nov 27;14(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0662-6.
5
The American Orthopaedic Association's Own the Bone® database: a national quality improvement project for the treatment of bone health in fragility fracture patients.美国矫形外科协会的“拥有骨骼”数据库:一项针对脆性骨折患者骨骼健康治疗的全国质量改进计划。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Sep;29(9):2101-2109. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4585-7. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
6
Rationale, study design, and descriptive data of the Lucky Bone™ Fracture Liaison Service.幸运骨骨折联络服务的基本原理、研究设计和描述性数据。
Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Feb 12;14(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0571-8.
7
Rush Fracture Liaison Service for capturing "missed opportunities" to treat osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures.脆性骨折联络服务,以捕捉治疗脆性骨折患者骨质疏松症的“错失机会”。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1861-1874. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4559-9. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
8
Implementation of the Western Australian Osteoporosis Model of Care: a fracture liaison service utilising emergency department information systems to identify patients with fragility fracture to improve current practice and reduce re-fracture rates: a 12-month analysis.西澳骨质疏松症护理模式的实施:利用急诊信息系统识别脆性骨折患者的骨折联络服务,以改善当前实践并降低再骨折率:为期 12 个月的分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1759-1770. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4526-5. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
9
Prescription of anti-osteoporosis medications after hospitalization for hip fracture: a multicentre Italian survey.髋部骨折住院后抗骨质疏松药物的处方:一项意大利多中心调查
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Oct;29(5):1031-1037. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0681-8. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
10
Post-fracture care gap: a retrospective population-based analysis of Hong Kong from 2009 to 2012.骨折后护理缺口:基于人群的2009年至2012年香港回顾性分析
Hong Kong Med J. 2018 Dec;24(6):579-583. doi: 10.12809/hkmj187227. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the association between a sedentary lifestyle and prevalence of primary osteoporosis: a community-based cross-sectional study among Chinese population.评估久坐生活方式与原发性骨质疏松症患病率之间的关联:一项基于社区的中国人群横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 4;14(6):e080243. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080243.
2
Advances in Osteoporosis Therapy: Focus on Osteoanabolic Agents, Secondary Fracture Prevention, and Perioperative Bone Health.骨质疏松症治疗进展:关注骨合成代谢药物、二次骨折预防和围手术期骨骼健康。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2023 Aug;21(4):386-400. doi: 10.1007/s11914-023-00793-8. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
3
Increasing Quality and Frequency of Goals-of-Care Documentation in the Highest-Risk Surgical Candidates: One-Year Results of the Surgical Pause Program.
提高高风险手术患者护理目标记录的质量和频率:手术暂停计划的一年结果
JB JS Open Access. 2023 Apr 24;8(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00107. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
4
Post-fracture care programs for prevention of subsequent fragility fractures: a literature assessment of current trends.预防后续脆性骨折的骨折后护理计划:当前趋势的文献评估。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Aug;33(8):1659-1676. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06358-2. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
Usefulness of a national hip fracture registry to evaluate the profile of patients in whom antiosteoporotic treatment is prescribed following hospital discharge.利用国家髋部骨折登记处评估在出院后接受抗骨质疏松治疗的患者的特征。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jul;31(7):1369-1375. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05341-z. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
Bench-to-bedside strategies for osteoporotic fracture: From osteoimmunology to mechanosensation.骨质疏松性骨折的从实验室到临床策略:从骨免疫学至机械感觉
Bone Res. 2019 Aug 15;7:25. doi: 10.1038/s41413-019-0066-7. eCollection 2019.
7
A Review and Clinical Perspective of the Impact of Osteoporosis on the Spine.骨质疏松症对脊柱影响的综述与临床展望
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019 Jul 17;10:2151459319861591. doi: 10.1177/2151459319861591. eCollection 2019.