Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia.
Psychol Sci. 2018 Apr;29(4):483-495. doi: 10.1177/0956797617738814. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
People will often rationalize the status quo, reconstruing it in an exaggeratedly positive light. They will even rationalize the status quo they anticipate, emphasizing the upsides and minimizing the downsides of sociopolitical realities they expect to take effect. Drawing on recent findings on the psychological triggers of rationalization, I present results from three field studies, one of which was preregistered, testing the hypothesis that an anticipated reality becoming current triggers an observable boost in people's rationalizations. San Franciscans rationalized a ban on plastic water bottles, Ontarians rationalized a targeted smoking ban, and Americans rationalized the presidency of Donald Trump, more in the days immediately after these realities became current compared with the days immediately before. Additional findings show evidence for a mechanism underlying these behaviors and rule out alternative accounts. These findings carry implications for scholarship on rationalization, for understanding protest behavior, and for policymakers.
人们常常会为现状找理由,过分强调其积极的一面。他们甚至会为自己预期的现状找理由,强调社会政治现实的好处,而将其弊端最小化。我利用最近关于合理化心理触发因素的研究结果,提出了三项实地研究的结果,其中一项是预先注册的,测试了这样一个假设:预期的现实成为当前的现实会引发人们明显增加合理化的行为。旧金山人对禁止使用塑料水瓶进行合理化,安大略省人对有针对性的禁烟令进行合理化,美国人对唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)担任总统进行合理化,与这些现实成为当前现实之前的日子相比,在这些现实成为当前现实之后的几天里,人们更倾向于进行合理化。其他发现为这些行为的机制提供了证据,并排除了其他解释。这些发现对合理化研究、理解抗议行为以及政策制定者都具有重要意义。