Suppr超能文献

随机 III 期临床试验:vinflunine 联合卡培他滨对比卡培他滨单药治疗既往接受蒽环类和紫杉类耐药的晚期乳腺癌患者。

Randomised phase III trial of vinflunine plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in patients with advanced breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and resistant to taxane.

机构信息

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2018 May 1;29(5):1195-1202. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy063.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine is an approved standard therapy for anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC). Vinflunine has demonstrated single-agent activity in phase II studies in this setting and activity and tolerability when combined with capecitabine. We compared the combination of vinflunine plus capecitabine (VC) with single-agent capecitabine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally recurrent/metastatic BC previously treated or resistant to an anthracycline and resistant to taxane therapy were randomly assigned to either vinflunine (280 mg/m2, day 1) plus oral capecitabine [825 mg/m2 twice daily (b.i.d.), days 1-14] every 3 weeks (q3w) or single-agent oral capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 b.i.d., days 1-14) q3w. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee. The study had 90% power to detect a 30% improvement in PFS.

RESULTS

Overall, 770 patients were randomised. PFS was significantly longer with VC than with capecitabine alone [hazard ratio, 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71-0.99; log-rank P = 0.043; median 5.6 versus 4.3 months, respectively]. Median overall survival was 13.9 versus 11.7 months with VC versus capecitabine alone, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.83-1.15; log-rank P = 0.77). No difference in quality of life was observed between the two treatment arms. The most common adverse events (NCI CTCAE version 3.0) in the combination arm were haematological and gastrointestinal. Grade 4 neutropenia was more frequent with VC (12% versus 1% with capecitabine alone); febrile neutropenia occurred in 2% versus 0.5%, respectively. Hand-foot syndrome was less frequent with VC (grade 3: 4% versus 19% for capecitabine alone). Peripheral neuropathy was uncommon in both arms (grade 3: 1% versus 0.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Vinflunine combined with capecitabine demonstrated a modest improvement in PFS and an acceptable safety profile compared with capecitabine alone in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated locally recurrent/metastatic BC.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01095003.

摘要

背景

卡培他滨是一种已被批准的标准疗法,适用于蒽环类和紫杉烷类预处理后的局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌(BC)。在这种情况下,长春氟宁在 II 期研究中显示出单药活性,并且与卡培他滨联合使用时具有活性和耐受性。我们比较了长春氟宁加卡培他滨(VC)与单药卡培他滨的组合。

患者和方法

局部复发性/转移性 BC 患者既往接受过蒽环类和紫杉烷类治疗或耐药,随机分配至长春氟宁(280mg/m2,第 1 天)加口服卡培他滨[825mg/m2,每日 2 次(b.i.d.),第 1-14 天],每 3 周(q3w)或单药口服卡培他滨(1250mg/m2,b.i.d.,第 1-14 天)q3w。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),由独立审查委员会评估。该研究有 90%的效能检测 PFS 提高 30%。

结果

总体而言,770 名患者被随机分配。与卡培他滨单药治疗相比,VC 治疗的 PFS 显著延长[风险比,0.84,95%置信区间(CI),0.71-0.99;对数秩 P=0.043;中位 PFS 分别为 5.6 个月和 4.3 个月]。与卡培他滨单药治疗相比,VC 组和卡培他滨单药组的中位总生存期分别为 13.9 个月和 11.7 个月[风险比,0.98;95%CI,0.83-1.15;对数秩 P=0.77]。两组间生活质量无差异。联合治疗组最常见的不良事件(NCI CTCAE 版本 3.0)为血液学和胃肠道不良事件。VC 组中性粒细胞减少症 4 级更为常见(12%比卡培他滨单药组 1%);发热性中性粒细胞减少症分别为 2%和 0.5%。VC 组手足综合征发生率较低(3 级:卡培他滨单药组 19%,VC 组 4%)。周围神经病变在两组中均不常见(3 级:卡培他滨单药组 0.3%,VC 组 1%)。

结论

与卡培他滨单药治疗相比,长春氟宁联合卡培他滨在蒽环类和紫杉烷类预处理后的局部复发性/转移性 BC 患者中,PFS 略有改善,安全性可接受。

临床试验.gov:NCT01095003。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验