Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France.
Ann Oncol. 2018 May 1;29(5):1195-1202. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy063.
Capecitabine is an approved standard therapy for anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC). Vinflunine has demonstrated single-agent activity in phase II studies in this setting and activity and tolerability when combined with capecitabine. We compared the combination of vinflunine plus capecitabine (VC) with single-agent capecitabine.
Patients with locally recurrent/metastatic BC previously treated or resistant to an anthracycline and resistant to taxane therapy were randomly assigned to either vinflunine (280 mg/m2, day 1) plus oral capecitabine [825 mg/m2 twice daily (b.i.d.), days 1-14] every 3 weeks (q3w) or single-agent oral capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 b.i.d., days 1-14) q3w. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee. The study had 90% power to detect a 30% improvement in PFS.
Overall, 770 patients were randomised. PFS was significantly longer with VC than with capecitabine alone [hazard ratio, 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71-0.99; log-rank P = 0.043; median 5.6 versus 4.3 months, respectively]. Median overall survival was 13.9 versus 11.7 months with VC versus capecitabine alone, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.83-1.15; log-rank P = 0.77). No difference in quality of life was observed between the two treatment arms. The most common adverse events (NCI CTCAE version 3.0) in the combination arm were haematological and gastrointestinal. Grade 4 neutropenia was more frequent with VC (12% versus 1% with capecitabine alone); febrile neutropenia occurred in 2% versus 0.5%, respectively. Hand-foot syndrome was less frequent with VC (grade 3: 4% versus 19% for capecitabine alone). Peripheral neuropathy was uncommon in both arms (grade 3: 1% versus 0.3%).
Vinflunine combined with capecitabine demonstrated a modest improvement in PFS and an acceptable safety profile compared with capecitabine alone in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated locally recurrent/metastatic BC.
CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01095003.
卡培他滨是一种已被批准的标准疗法,适用于蒽环类和紫杉烷类预处理后的局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌(BC)。在这种情况下,长春氟宁在 II 期研究中显示出单药活性,并且与卡培他滨联合使用时具有活性和耐受性。我们比较了长春氟宁加卡培他滨(VC)与单药卡培他滨的组合。
局部复发性/转移性 BC 患者既往接受过蒽环类和紫杉烷类治疗或耐药,随机分配至长春氟宁(280mg/m2,第 1 天)加口服卡培他滨[825mg/m2,每日 2 次(b.i.d.),第 1-14 天],每 3 周(q3w)或单药口服卡培他滨(1250mg/m2,b.i.d.,第 1-14 天)q3w。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),由独立审查委员会评估。该研究有 90%的效能检测 PFS 提高 30%。
总体而言,770 名患者被随机分配。与卡培他滨单药治疗相比,VC 治疗的 PFS 显著延长[风险比,0.84,95%置信区间(CI),0.71-0.99;对数秩 P=0.043;中位 PFS 分别为 5.6 个月和 4.3 个月]。与卡培他滨单药治疗相比,VC 组和卡培他滨单药组的中位总生存期分别为 13.9 个月和 11.7 个月[风险比,0.98;95%CI,0.83-1.15;对数秩 P=0.77]。两组间生活质量无差异。联合治疗组最常见的不良事件(NCI CTCAE 版本 3.0)为血液学和胃肠道不良事件。VC 组中性粒细胞减少症 4 级更为常见(12%比卡培他滨单药组 1%);发热性中性粒细胞减少症分别为 2%和 0.5%。VC 组手足综合征发生率较低(3 级:卡培他滨单药组 19%,VC 组 4%)。周围神经病变在两组中均不常见(3 级:卡培他滨单药组 0.3%,VC 组 1%)。
与卡培他滨单药治疗相比,长春氟宁联合卡培他滨在蒽环类和紫杉烷类预处理后的局部复发性/转移性 BC 患者中,PFS 略有改善,安全性可接受。
临床试验.gov:NCT01095003。