Suppr超能文献

在临床实践中转移性乳腺癌患者使用氟维司群进展后的治疗:一项多中心回顾性研究。

Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 8;9(1):1710. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37472-z.

Abstract

Fulvestrant (Ful) is an effective and widely used agent for first- and second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there is no evidence of treatment after progression on Ful. Our study aimed to investigate the profile of daily practice regarding therapy after Ful. A consecutive series of 131 HR+, HER2- MBC patients who failed Ful 500 mg as first-line or second-line therapy from June 2014 to June 2017 in 6 institutions were included and analysed. Among 131 patients who failed Ful with similar baseline characteristics, 31 (23.7%) received endocrine therapy (ET), and 100 (76.3%) were treated with chemotherapy (CT). The most frequently applied CT regimen was capecitabine (32%), and the ET regimen was exemestane + everolimus (35.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with bone-only metastasis were associated with lower CT use (OR = 7.97, 95% CI 1.51-41.84, P = 0.01). Among patients who received CT and ET as subsequent treatments, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months (95% CI 6.2-8.8) and 6.0 months (95% CI 4.1-7.9), respectively (p = 0.03). Among patients who were resistant to Ful (PFS < 6 months), the PFS on CT was significantly longer than that on ET (7.1 months vs 3.9 months, p = 0.024, HR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.26-0.97); however, among patients with a PFS ≥6 months on Ful, the efficacy of CT and ET was similar. Additionally, among patients with an older age, bone-only metastasis and ≥3 metastatic sites, no significant difference was observed between the CT and ET groups. Moreover, ET was much more tolerated than CT in terms of the incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities (9.6% vs 27%, P < 0.05). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Thus, our findings reveal the pattern of post-Ful treatment in current clinical practice and provide evidence on the efficacy, safety and choice of these treatments.

摘要

氟维司群(Ful)是一种有效的、广泛应用的激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体-2 阴性(HR+/HER2-)转移性乳腺癌(MBC)一线和二线治疗药物。然而,对于 Ful 进展后的治疗尚无证据。我们的研究旨在探讨 Ful 治疗后治疗方案的实际情况。连续纳入了 6 家机构 2014 年 6 月至 2017 年 6 月期间接受 Ful 500mg 一线或二线治疗失败的 131 例 HR+、HER2-MBC 患者,并进行分析。在 131 例 Ful 治疗失败的患者中,基线特征相似,31 例(23.7%)接受了内分泌治疗(ET),100 例(76.3%)接受了化疗(CT)。最常应用的 CT 方案是卡培他滨(32%),ET 方案是依维莫司+依西美坦(35.5%)。多因素分析显示,仅有骨转移的患者 CT 使用率较低(OR=7.97,95%CI 1.51-41.84,P=0.01)。在接受 CT 和 ET 作为后续治疗的患者中,中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为 7.5 个月(95%CI 6.2-8.8)和 6.0 个月(95%CI 4.1-7.9)(p=0.03)。在 Ful 耐药(PFS<6 个月)的患者中,CT 的 PFS 明显长于 ET(7.1 个月比 3.9 个月,p=0.024,HR=0.5,95%CI 0.26-0.97);然而,在 Ful 治疗 PFS≥6 个月的患者中,CT 和 ET 的疗效相似。此外,在年龄较大、仅有骨转移和≥3 个转移部位的患者中,CT 和 ET 组之间无显著差异。此外,在 3/4 级毒性方面,ET 的耐受性明显优于 CT(9.6%比 27%,P<0.05)。中位总生存期(OS)未达到。因此,我们的研究结果揭示了氟维司群治疗后治疗模式的实际情况,并提供了这些治疗方法的疗效、安全性和选择的证据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验