• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泰国曼谷一项使用含氟牛奶的学校龋齿预防项目的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a school-based dental caries prevention program using fluoridated milk in Bangkok, Thailand.

作者信息

Mariño Rodrigo, Traub Fernando, Lekfuangfu Puangtong, Niyomsilp Kornkamol

机构信息

Melbourne Dental School, Oral Health Cooperative Research Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.

Dental Health Bureau, Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2018 Feb 15;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0485-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-018-0485-7
PMID:29448929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5815217/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study modelled the cost-effectiveness, from a societal perspective, of a program that used fluoridated milk to prevent dental caries in children who were 6 years old at the beginning of the program, versus non-intervention, after 6 years.

METHODS

After 6 years, children in the milk-fluoridation program had a significant (34%) reduction in dental caries experience compared to those in the comparison community (i.e., received school milk without added fluoride) (DMFS: 1.06 vs. 1.60).

RESULTS

This improvement was achieved with an investment of Thailand Baht (THB) 5,345,048 over 6 years (or THB 11.88 per child, per year) (1 US$ = THB(2011) 30.0). When comparing the costs of the operation of the program and dental treatment in the test community with those of the comparison community, the program resulted in a net societal savings of THB 8,177,179 (range 18,597,122 to THB 7,920,711) after 6 years. This investment would result in 40,500 DMFS avoided in a community with a childhood population of 75,000 [DMFS avoided: 75,000 x (- 0.54)].

CONCLUSIONS

While the analysis has inherent limitations due to its dependence on a range of assumptions, the results suggest that, from a societal perspective, when compared with the non-intervention group, the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration intervention appeared to be a more cost-efficient option than current standard oral health care.

摘要

背景

本研究从社会角度对一项使用加氟牛奶预防项目开始时6岁儿童龋齿的项目与6年后不干预的成本效益进行了建模。

方法

6年后,与对照社区(即饮用未添加氟化物的学校牛奶)的儿童相比,参与牛奶加氟项目的儿童龋齿经历显著减少(34%)(DMFS:1.06对1.60)。

结果

通过在6年内投资5,345,048泰铢(或每名儿童每年11.88泰铢)(1美元=2011年30.0泰铢)实现了这一改善。将测试社区项目运营成本和牙科治疗成本与对照社区的成本进行比较时,该项目在6年后为社会带来了8,177,179泰铢的净节省(范围为18,597,122泰铢至7,920,711泰铢)。在一个儿童人口为75,000的社区中,这项投资将避免40,500个DMFS [避免的DMFS:75,ooo×(- 0.54)]。

结论

虽然由于依赖一系列假设,该分析存在固有局限性,但结果表明,从社会角度来看,与非干预组相比,曼谷市政府的干预措施似乎比当前标准口腔保健更具成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a school-based dental caries prevention program using fluoridated milk in Bangkok, Thailand.泰国曼谷一项使用含氟牛奶的学校龋齿预防项目的成本效益分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Feb 15;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0485-7.
2
Cost-effectiveness models for dental caries prevention programmes among Chilean schoolchildren.智利学童龋齿预防项目的成本效益模型
Community Dent Health. 2012 Dec;29(4):302-8.
3
Milk fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries.通过牛奶加氟预防龋齿。
Acta Med Acad. 2013 Nov;42(2):156-67. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.83.
4
The cost-effectiveness of adding fluorides to milk-products distributed by the National Food Supplement Programme (PNAC) in rural areas of Chile.在智利农村地区,通过国家食品补充计划(PNAC)向奶制品中添加氟化物的成本效益。
Community Dent Health. 2007 Jun;24(2):75-81.
5
Modeling an economic evaluation of a salt fluoridation program in Peru.对秘鲁盐氟化项目进行经济评价建模。
J Public Health Dent. 2011 Spring;71(2):125-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2010.00209.x.
6
Caries prevalence in a rural Chilean community after cessation of a powdered milk fluoridation program.智利一个农村社区停止奶粉氟化项目后的龋齿患病率。
J Public Health Dent. 2004 Spring;64(2):101-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2004.tb02735.x.
7
Long-term evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of community milk fluoridation in Bulgaria.保加利亚社区牛奶加氟临床效果的长期评估。
Community Dent Health. 2015 Dec;32(4):199-203.
8
Fluoridated milk for preventing dental caries.预防龋齿的氟化牛奶。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20(3):CD003876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003876.pub2.
9
The impact of changing dental needs on cost savings from fluoridation.氟化物防龋对改变的口腔需求的成本节约的影响。
Aust Dent J. 2010 Mar;55(1):37-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01173.x.
10
How effective and cost-effective is water fluoridation for adults and adolescents? The LOTUS 10-year retrospective cohort study.水氟化对成年人和青少年的有效性及成本效益如何?LOTUS十年回顾性队列研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2024 Aug;52(4):413-423. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12930. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review on cost-effectiveness analysis of school-based oral health promotion program.系统评价:基于学校的口腔健康促进项目的成本效益分析
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0284518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284518. eCollection 2023.
2
An Analytical Protocol for the Differentiation and the Potentiometric Determination of Fluorine-Containing Fractions in Bovine Milk.牛乳中含氟部分的分离和电位测定的分析方案。
Molecules. 2023 Jan 31;28(3):1349. doi: 10.3390/molecules28031349.
3
The Current Strategies in Controlling Oral Diseases by Herbal and Chemical Materials.利用草药和化学材料控制口腔疾病的当前策略
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Aug 21;2021:3423001. doi: 10.1155/2021/3423001. eCollection 2021.
4
Use of oral health care services in Peru: trends of socio-economic inequalities before and after the implementation of Universal Health Assurance.秘鲁口腔保健服务的使用情况:在实施全民健康保障前后社会经济不平等趋势的变化。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Mar 7;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0731-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Fluoridated milk for preventing dental caries.用于预防龋齿的氟化牛奶。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD003876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003876.pub4.
2
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)——解释与说明:国际卫生经济学会健康经济评估报告指南良好报告实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.
3
The cost-effectiveness of adding fluorides to milk-products distributed by the National Food Supplement Programme (PNAC) in rural areas of Chile.在智利农村地区,通过国家食品补充计划(PNAC)向奶制品中添加氟化物的成本效益。
Community Dent Health. 2007 Jun;24(2):75-81.
4
A taxonomy of model structures for economic evaluation of health technologies.卫生技术经济评估模型结构的分类法。
Health Econ. 2006 Dec;15(12):1295-310. doi: 10.1002/hec.1148.
5
Modelling in the economic evaluation of health care: selecting the appropriate approach.医疗保健经济评估中的建模:选择合适的方法。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Apr;9(2):110-8. doi: 10.1258/135581904322987535.
6
Discounting for health effects in cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis.成本效益分析和成本效果分析中健康效应的贴现
Health Econ. 2001 Oct;10(7):587-99. doi: 10.1002/hec.618.
7
Recommendations for using fluoride to prevent and control dental caries in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.美国预防和控制龋齿用氟的建议。疾病控制与预防中心。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001 Aug 17;50(RR-14):1-42.
8
Methods for systematic reviews of economic evaluations for the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Task Force on Community Preventive Services.《社区预防服务指南》经济评估系统评价方法。社区预防服务特别工作组。
Am J Prev Med. 2000 Jan;18(1 Suppl):75-91. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00120-8.
9
The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.成本效益分析在健康与医学中的作用。健康与医学成本效益专题小组。
JAMA. 1996 Oct 9;276(14):1172-7.
10
Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party.《英国医学杂志》经济学投稿的作者及同行评审指南。《英国医学杂志》经济评估工作小组。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 3;313(7052):275-83. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275.