Morabito Alessandro
The Medical Oncology Unit, Thoracic-Pulmonary Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, "Fondazione G. Pascale" - IRCCS, Via Mariano Semola, 80131, Naples, Italy.
BMC Med. 2018 Feb 16;16(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1011-0.
The therapeutic approach for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable mutations has been revolutionized by the recent approval of new effective drugs with various mechanisms of action, including nintedanib, ramucirumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and afatinib. The recent network meta-analysis of Créquit et al. (BMC Medicine, 15:193, 2017) compared the effectiveness and tolerability of the second-line treatments for advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown status for EGFR. The authors found that immunotherapy might be more efficacious than the currently recommended treatments. However, their meta-analysis does not take into account the role of predictive biomarkers - this is indeed a crucial point in the decision-making process considering that only a fraction of advanced NSCLC patients might derive a long-term benefit from second-line immunotherapy. The identification of molecular biomarkers that can predict a response to immune checkpoints, angiogenesis, and EGFR inhibitors remains an important goal of clinical research in order to maximize the benefit of these agents and to aid clinicians in the decision-making process.Please see related article: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x.
近期,多种作用机制的新型有效药物获批,包括尼达尼布、雷莫西尤单抗、纳武单抗、帕博利珠单抗、阿特珠单抗和阿法替尼,这彻底改变了无可操作突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的二线治疗方法。Créquit等人近期发表在《BMC医学》(2017年,第15卷,第193页)上的网状Meta分析,比较了表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)野生型或状态未知的晚期NSCLC二线治疗的有效性和耐受性。作者发现免疫疗法可能比目前推荐的治疗方法更有效。然而,他们的Meta分析没有考虑预测性生物标志物的作用——考虑到只有一小部分晚期NSCLC患者可能从二线免疫疗法中获得长期益处,这确实是决策过程中的一个关键点。确定能够预测对免疫检查点、血管生成和EGFR抑制剂反应的分子生物标志物,仍然是临床研究的一个重要目标,以便最大限度地发挥这些药物的益处,并帮助临床医生进行决策。请参阅相关文章:https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x 。