Dean Sarah G, Poltawski Leon, Forster Anne, Taylor Rod S, Spencer Anne, James Martin, Allison Rhoda, Stevens Shirley, Norris Meriel, Shepherd Anthony I, Landa Paolo, Pulsford Richard M, Hollands Laura, Calitri Raff
University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK.
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 15;8(2):e018409. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018409.
To assess acceptability and feasibility of trial processes and the Rehabilitation Training (ReTrain) intervention including an assessment of intervention fidelity.
A two-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial with parallel mixed methods process and economic evaluations.
Community settings across two sites in Devon.
Eligible participants were: 18 years old or over, with a diagnosis of stroke and with self-reported mobility issues, no contraindications to physical activity, discharged from National Health Service or any other formal rehabilitation programme at least 1 month before, willing to be randomised to either control or ReTrain and attend the training venue, possessing cognitive capacity and communication ability sufficient to participate. Participants were individually randomised (1:1) via a computer-generated randomisation sequence minimised for time since stroke and level of functional disability. Only outcome assessors independent of the research team were blinded to group allocation.
ReTrain comprised (1) an introductory one-to-one session; (2) ten, twice-weekly group classes with up to two trainers and eight clients; (3) a closing one-to-one session, followed by three drop-in sessions over the subsequent 3 months. Participants received a bespoke home-based training programme. All participants received treatment as usual. The control group received an exercise after stroke advice booklet.
Candidate primary outcomes included functional mobility and physical activity.
Forty-five participants were randomised (ReTrain=23; Control=22); data were available from 40 participants at 6 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=19) and 41 at 9 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=20). We demonstrated ability to recruit and retain participants. Participants were not burdened by the requirements of the study. We were able to calculate sample estimates for candidate primary outcomes and test procedures for process and health economic evaluations.
All objectives were fulfilled and indicated that a definitive trial of ReTrain is feasible and acceptable.
NCT02429180; Results.
评估试验流程以及康复训练(ReTrain)干预措施的可接受性和可行性,包括对干预保真度的评估。
一项两组、评估者设盲、随机对照试验,同时进行平行混合方法的过程和经济评估。
德文郡两个地点的社区环境。
符合条件的参与者为:年龄在18岁及以上,诊断为中风且有自我报告的行动不便问题,无体育活动禁忌症,至少在1个月前从国民健康服务体系或任何其他正式康复项目出院,愿意被随机分配到对照组或ReTrain组并参加训练场地活动,具备足以参与的认知能力和沟通能力。参与者通过计算机生成的随机序列进行个体随机分组(1:1),该序列按中风后的时间和功能残疾程度进行了最小化处理。只有独立于研究团队的结果评估者对分组情况设盲。
ReTrain包括(1)一次一对一的入门课程;(2)十次每周两次的小组课程,最多两名培训师和八名客户;(3)一次一对一的结业课程,随后在接下来的3个月内有三次随时参加的课程。参与者接受了定制的家庭训练计划。所有参与者均接受常规治疗。对照组收到一本中风后运动建议手册。
候选主要结果包括功能移动性和身体活动。
45名参与者被随机分组(ReTrain组 = 23名;对照组 = 22名);在6个月随访时有40名参与者的数据可用(ReTrain组 = 21名;对照组 = 19名),在9个月随访时有41名参与者的数据可用(ReTrain组 = 21名;对照组 = 20名)。我们证明了招募和留住参与者的能力。参与者未因研究要求而负担过重。我们能够计算候选主要结果的样本估计值,并进行过程和健康经济评估的测试程序。
所有目标均已实现,表明对ReTrain进行确定性试验是可行且可接受的。
NCT02429180;结果