Ribeiro Daniel Cury, Day Ashleigh, Dickerson Clark R
Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
J Man Manip Ther. 2017 Dec;25(5):260-269. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2017.1290310. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
To assess: (1) the presence of any carry-over effect between interventions; (2) the immediate effects of inferior shoulder mobilization on shoulder and scapular muscle activity; and (3) to compare muscle activity response between the control and mobilization conditions. Repeated measures, cross-over, pre-post intervention study with sample of convenience.
Twenty-two asymptomatic individuals performed 10 repetitions of shoulder abduction before and after the control and mobilization, with a dosage of three sets of 30-s duration, with grade-IV. The order of intervention was randomized. Surface electromyography was used for recording activity of upper and lower trapezius; anterior, middle and posterior deltoids; supraspinatus; infraspinatus; and serratus anterior. Repeated measures mixed-model analysis of variance was used to assess immediate changes in muscle activity levels following inferior shoulder mobilization. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used for comparing muscle activity waveforms between control and mobilization conditions throughout the range of motion.
No systematic changes in muscle activity levels were found between: (1) baseline and follow-up for each condition, at the concentric and eccentric phases of shoulder abduction; (2) control and mobilization conditions during the concentric and eccentric phases of shoulder abduction. SPM results suggested no differences in muscle activity pattern between conditions.
Inferior shoulder mobilization did not produce immediate effects on shoulder and scapular muscle activity. It is possible that the dose used was insufficient to generate an immediate neuromuscular response to the mobilization.
评估:(1)干预措施之间是否存在任何遗留效应;(2)下肩部松动术对肩部和肩胛部肌肉活动的即时影响;(3)比较对照组和松动术条件下的肌肉活动反应。采用方便抽样的重复测量、交叉、干预前后研究。
22名无症状个体在对照组和松动术干预前后各进行10次肩部外展重复动作,每组持续30秒,共三组,强度为IV级。干预顺序随机。使用表面肌电图记录上、下斜方肌;前、中、后三角肌;冈上肌;冈下肌;以及前锯肌的活动。采用重复测量混合模型方差分析评估下肩部松动术后肌肉活动水平的即时变化。使用统计参数映射(SPM)比较整个运动范围内对照组和松动术条件下的肌肉活动波形。
在以下方面未发现肌肉活动水平的系统性变化:(1)每种条件下基线和随访之间,在肩部外展的向心和离心阶段;(2)肩部外展的向心和离心阶段对照组和松动术条件之间。SPM结果表明不同条件下肌肉活动模式无差异。
下肩部松动术对肩部和肩胛部肌肉活动未产生即时影响。所用剂量可能不足以对松动术产生即时神经肌肉反应。