• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于在不同季节对多种物种的异面叶叶绿素含量进行遥感评估的稳健植被指数。

A robust vegetation index for remotely assessing chlorophyll content of dorsiventral leaves across several species in different seasons.

作者信息

Lu Shan, Lu Fan, You Wenqiang, Wang Zheyi, Liu Yu, Omasa Kenji

机构信息

1School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, 5268 Renmin Street, Changchun, 130024 China.

2Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657 Japan.

出版信息

Plant Methods. 2018 Feb 14;14:15. doi: 10.1186/s13007-018-0281-z. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s13007-018-0281-z
PMID:29449875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5812224/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) provides valuable information about plant physiology. Most of the published chlorophyll vegetation indices at the leaf level have been based on the spectral characteristics of the adaxial leaf surface, thus, they are not appropriate for estimating LCC when both the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces influence the spectral reflectance. We attempted to address this challenge by measuring the spectral reflectance of the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces of several plant species at different growth stages using a portable field spectroradiometer. The relationships between more than 30 published reflectance indices with LCC were analyzed to determine which index estimated LCC most effectively. Additionally, since the relationships determined on one set of samples might have poor predictive performances when applied to other samples, a robust wavelength region is required to render the spectral index generally applicable, regardless of the leaf surface or plant species.

RESULTS

The Modified Datt (MDATT) index, which is the ratio of reflectance difference defined as (R - R)/(R - R), exhibited the strongest correlation (R = 0.856, RMSE = 6.872 μg/cm), with LCC of all the indices tested when all the leaf samples from the adaxial and abaxial surfaces were combined. The optimal wavelength regions, which were derived from the contour maps of R between the MDATT index and LCC for the datasets of one side or both leaf surfaces of each plant species and their intersection, indicated that the red-edge to near-infrared wavelength (723-885 nm) was optimal for λ, while the red-edge region (697-771 nm) was optimal for λ and λ. In these optimal wavelength regions, when the MDATT index was used to estimate LCC, an R higher than 0.8 could be obtained. The correlation of the MDATT index with LCC was the same when the positions of λ and λ were exchanged in the index.

CONCLUSIONS

MDATT is proposed as an optimal index for the remote estimation of vegetation chlorophyll content across several plant species in different growth stages when reflectance from both leaf surfaces is considered. The red-edge to near-infrared wavelength (723-885 nm) for λ, as well as the red-edge region (697-771 nm) for λ or λ, are considered to be the most robust for constructing the MDATT index for estimating LCC, regardless of the leaf surface or plant species.

摘要

背景

叶片叶绿素含量(LCC)提供了有关植物生理的有价值信息。大多数已发表的叶片水平的叶绿素植被指数都是基于叶片正面的光谱特征,因此,当叶片正面和背面都影响光谱反射率时,它们不适用于估算LCC。我们试图通过使用便携式野外光谱辐射计测量几种植物在不同生长阶段的叶片正面和背面的光谱反射率来应对这一挑战。分析了30多个已发表的反射率指数与LCC之间的关系,以确定哪个指数能最有效地估算LCC。此外,由于在一组样本上确定的关系应用于其他样本时可能具有较差的预测性能,因此需要一个稳健的波长区域以使光谱指数普遍适用,而不受叶片表面或植物种类的影响。

结果

修正的达特(MDATT)指数,即定义为(R - R)/(R - R)的反射率差值之比,在将来自叶片正面和背面的所有叶片样本合并时,与所有测试指数的LCC表现出最强的相关性(R = 0.856,RMSE = 6.872μg/cm)。从每个植物物种叶片一侧或两侧数据集的MDATT指数与LCC之间的R等值线图及其交集得出的最佳波长区域表明,红边到近红外波长(723 - 885nm)对λ是最佳的,而红边区域(697 - 771nm)对λ和λ是最佳的。在这些最佳波长区域中,当使用MDATT指数估算LCC时,可以获得高于0.8的R值。当指数中λ和λ的位置互换时,MDATT指数与LCC的相关性相同。

结论

当考虑叶片两面的反射率时,建议将MDATT作为估算不同生长阶段多种植物植被叶绿素含量的最佳指数。对于构建用于估算LCC的MDATT指数,λ的红边到近红外波长(723 - 885nm)以及λ或λ的红边区域(697 - 771nm)被认为是最稳健的,而不受叶片表面或植物种类的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/45df8247c461/13007_2018_281_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/37766889b5b9/13007_2018_281_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/ea0e1f1f54f2/13007_2018_281_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/5b601d25015f/13007_2018_281_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/6d9801763c57/13007_2018_281_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/cdd066e76009/13007_2018_281_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/816c1c48dbca/13007_2018_281_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/be2f27b8c100/13007_2018_281_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/c471693a5c74/13007_2018_281_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/45df8247c461/13007_2018_281_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/37766889b5b9/13007_2018_281_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/ea0e1f1f54f2/13007_2018_281_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/5b601d25015f/13007_2018_281_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/6d9801763c57/13007_2018_281_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/cdd066e76009/13007_2018_281_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/816c1c48dbca/13007_2018_281_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/be2f27b8c100/13007_2018_281_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/c471693a5c74/13007_2018_281_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c85/5812224/45df8247c461/13007_2018_281_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A robust vegetation index for remotely assessing chlorophyll content of dorsiventral leaves across several species in different seasons.一种用于在不同季节对多种物种的异面叶叶绿素含量进行遥感评估的稳健植被指数。
Plant Methods. 2018 Feb 14;14:15. doi: 10.1186/s13007-018-0281-z. eCollection 2018.
2
Comparing vegetation indices for remote chlorophyll measurement of white poplar and Chinese elm leaves with different adaxial and abaxial surfaces.比较用于测量具有不同正反叶面的白杨和榔榆叶片叶绿素含量的植被指数。
J Exp Bot. 2015 Sep;66(18):5625-37. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv270. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
3
Estimating Chlorophyll Content of Leafy Green Vegetables from Adaxial and Abaxial Reflectance.估算叶菜类蔬菜的叶正面和叶背面反射率的叶绿素含量。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Sep 20;19(19):4059. doi: 10.3390/s19194059.
4
Estimation of the leaf chlorophyll content using multiangular spectral reflectance factor.利用多角度光谱反射率因子估算叶片叶绿素含量。
Plant Cell Environ. 2019 Nov;42(11):3152-3165. doi: 10.1111/pce.13605. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
Off-Nadir Hyperspectral Sensing for Estimation of Vertical Profile of Leaf Chlorophyll Content within Wheat Canopies.非天底高光谱遥感估算小麦冠层内叶片叶绿素垂直分布
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Nov 23;17(12):2711. doi: 10.3390/s17122711.
6
Relationship between leaf optical properties, chlorophyll fluorescence and pigment changes in senescing Acer saccharum leaves.衰老糖槭叶片的叶片光学特性、叶绿素荧光与色素变化之间的关系
Tree Physiol. 2016 Jun;36(6):694-711. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpv148. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
7
Chlorophyll content in eucalypt vegetation at the leaf and canopy scales as derived from high resolution spectral data.基于高分辨率光谱数据得出的桉树林植被叶片和冠层尺度的叶绿素含量。
Tree Physiol. 2003 Jan;23(1):23-31. doi: 10.1093/treephys/23.1.23.
8
The Effect of Leaf Stacking on Leaf Reflectance and Vegetation Indices Measured by Contact Probe during the Season.叶片叠置对接触式探头测量季节内叶片反射率和植被指数的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2017 May 24;17(6):1202. doi: 10.3390/s17061202.
9
[Study of photosynthetic characteristics of transgenic barley based on reflectance of single leaf].基于单叶反射率的转基因大麦光合特性研究
Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi. 2012 Jan;32(1):204-8.
10
Assessing the Spectral Properties of Sunlit and Shaded Components in Rice Canopies with Near-Ground Imaging Spectroscopy Data.利用近地成像光谱数据评估稻田冠层中受光和遮光部分的光谱特性。
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Mar 13;17(3):578. doi: 10.3390/s17030578.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating Hyperspectral Reflectance-Based Phenotyping and SSR Marker-Based Genotyping for Assessing the Salt Tolerance of Wheat Genotypes under Real Field Conditions.结合基于高光谱反射率的表型分析和基于SSR标记的基因分型,以评估田间实际条件下小麦基因型的耐盐性。
Plants (Basel). 2024 Sep 19;13(18):2610. doi: 10.3390/plants13182610.
2
Spectral characterization and severity assessment of rice blast disease using univariate and multivariate models.利用单变量和多变量模型对稻瘟病进行光谱特征分析和严重程度评估。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Feb 23;14:1067189. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1067189. eCollection 2023.
3
Slope position- mediated soil environmental filtering drives plant community assembly processes in hilly shrublands of Guilin, China.

本文引用的文献

1
THE DEGRADATION OF CHLOROPHYLL - A BIOLOGICAL ENIGMA.叶绿素的降解——一个生物学谜题。
New Phytol. 1987 Oct;107(2):255-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00181.x.
2
Comparing vegetation indices for remote chlorophyll measurement of white poplar and Chinese elm leaves with different adaxial and abaxial surfaces.比较用于测量具有不同正反叶面的白杨和榔榆叶片叶绿素含量的植被指数。
J Exp Bot. 2015 Sep;66(18):5625-37. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv270. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
3
Reflectance variation within the in-chlorophyll centre waveband for robust retrieval of leaf chlorophyll content.
坡位介导的土壤环境过滤驱动中国桂林丘陵灌丛植物群落构建过程。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 6;13:1074191. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1074191. eCollection 2022.
4
Applying spectral fractal dimension index to predict the SPAD value of rice leaves under bacterial blight disease stress.应用光谱分形维数指数预测白叶枯病胁迫下水稻叶片的叶绿素相对含量(SPAD)值。
Plant Methods. 2022 May 18;18(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13007-022-00898-8.
5
Combining Hyperspectral Reflectance Indices and Multivariate Analysis to Estimate Different Units of Chlorophyll Content of Spring Wheat under Salinity Conditions.结合高光谱反射指数与多变量分析估算盐胁迫条件下春小麦叶绿素含量的不同单位
Plants (Basel). 2022 Feb 7;11(3):456. doi: 10.3390/plants11030456.
6
Leaf area index estimation model for UAV image hyperspectral data based on wavelength variable selection and machine learning methods.基于波长变量选择和机器学习方法的无人机图像高光谱数据叶面积指数估计模型
Plant Methods. 2021 May 3;17(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13007-021-00750-5.
7
Use of Hyperspectral Reflectance Sensing for Assessing Growth and Chlorophyll Content of Spring Wheat Grown under Simulated Saline Field Conditions.利用高光谱反射传感技术评估模拟盐渍田条件下春小麦的生长和叶绿素含量
Plants (Basel). 2021 Jan 6;10(1):101. doi: 10.3390/plants10010101.
8
Impact of drought associated with high temperatures on Coffea canephora plantations: a case study in Espírito Santo State, Brazil.高温干旱对咖啡种植园的影响:以巴西圣埃斯皮里图州为例。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 12;10(1):19719. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76713-y.
9
A robust spectral angle index for remotely assessing soybean canopy chlorophyll content in different growing stages.一种用于远程评估不同生长阶段大豆冠层叶绿素含量的稳健光谱角指数。
Plant Methods. 2020 Jul 31;16:104. doi: 10.1186/s13007-020-00643-z. eCollection 2020.
10
Estimating Chlorophyll Content of Leafy Green Vegetables from Adaxial and Abaxial Reflectance.估算叶菜类蔬菜的叶正面和叶背面反射率的叶绿素含量。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Sep 20;19(19):4059. doi: 10.3390/s19194059.
叶绿素中心波段内的反射率变化用于稳健反演叶片叶绿素含量。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 3;9(11):e110812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110812. eCollection 2014.
4
Scientific and technical challenges in remote sensing of plant canopy reflectance and fluorescence.植物冠层反射率和荧光遥感中的科学与技术挑战。
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(11):2987-3004. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp156. Epub 2009 May 22.
5
Reflectance and transmittance of light by leaves.叶片的光反射和光透射。
Plant Physiol. 1971 May;47(5):656-62. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.5.656.
6
Exploring the relationship between reflectance red edge and chlorophyll content in slash pine.探索湿地松反射率红边与叶绿素含量之间的关系。
Tree Physiol. 1990 Dec;7(1_2_3_4):33-48. doi: 10.1093/treephys/7.1-2-3-4.33.
7
Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves.高等植物叶片叶绿素含量与光谱反射率的关系及叶片叶绿素无损评估算法
J Plant Physiol. 2003 Mar;160(3):271-82. doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-00887.
8
Spectrophotometric characteristics of chlorophylls a and b and their pheophytins in ethanol.叶绿素a和叶绿素b及其脱镁叶绿素在乙醇中的分光光度特性。
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Nov 29;109(2):448-53. doi: 10.1016/0926-6585(65)90170-6.