Roberts Anthony Paul, Morrow Gerry, Walkley Michael, Flavell Linda, Phillips Terry, Sykes Eliot, Kirkpatrick Graeme, Monkhouse Diane, Laws David, Gray Christopher
South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Clarity Informatics Ltd, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
BMJ Open Qual. 2017 Sep 24;6(2):e000123. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000123. eCollection 2017.
Monitoring hospital mortality using retrospective case record review (RCRR) is being adopted throughout the National Health Service (NHS) in England with publication of estimates of avoidable mortality beginning in 2017. We describe our experience of reviewing the care records of inpatients who died following admission to hospital in four acute hospital NHS Foundation Trusts in the North-East of England.
RCRR of 7370 patients who died between January 2012 and December 2015. Cases were reviewed by consultant reviewers with support from other disciplines and graded in terms of quality of care and preventability of deaths. Results were compared with the estimates published in the Preventable Incidents, Survival and Mortality (PRISM) studies, which established the original method.
34 patients (0.5%, 95% CI 0.3% to 0.6%) were judged to have a greater than 50% probability of death being preventable. 1680 patients (22.3%, 95% CI 22.4% to 23.3%) were judged to have room for improvement in clinical, organisational (or both) aspects of care or less than satisfactory care.
Reviews using clinicians within trusts produce lower estimates of preventable deaths than published results using external clinicians. More research is needed to understand the reasons for this, but as the requirement for NHS Trusts to publish estimates of preventable mortality is based on reviews by consultants working for those trusts, lower estimates of preventable mortality can be expected. Room for improvement in the quality of care is more common than preventability of death and so mortality reviews contribute to improvement activity although the outcome of care cannot be changed. RCRR conducted internally is a feasible mechanism for delivering quantitative analysis and in the future can provide qualitative insights relating to inhospital deaths.
自2017年开始公布可避免死亡率估计值以来,英格兰国民医疗服务体系(NHS)正在全面采用回顾性病例记录审查(RCRR)来监测医院死亡率。我们描述了在英格兰东北部四个急性医院NHS基金会信托机构中,对入院后死亡的住院患者护理记录进行审查的经验。
对2012年1月至2015年12月期间死亡的7370例患者进行RCRR。病例由顾问评审员在其他学科的支持下进行审查,并根据护理质量和死亡可预防性进行分级。将结果与采用原始方法的《可预防事件、生存和死亡率》(PRISM)研究中公布的估计值进行比较。
34例患者(0.5%,95%置信区间0.3%至0.6%)被判定死亡可预防性大于50%。1680例患者(22.3%,9置信区间22.4%至23.3%)被判定在临床、组织(或两者)护理方面有改进空间或护理不太令人满意。
与使用外部临床医生公布的结果相比,由信托机构内的临床医生进行的审查得出的可预防死亡估计值更低。需要更多研究来了解其原因,但由于NHS信托机构公布可预防死亡率估计值的要求是基于为这些信托机构工作的顾问进行的审查,因此可预期可预防死亡率的估计值会更低。护理质量改进空间比死亡可预防性更为常见,因此死亡率审查有助于改进活动,尽管护理结果无法改变。内部进行的RCRR是进行定量分析的可行机制,未来还可提供与住院死亡相关的定性见解。