Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Biomedical Group (BIO277), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Dec;22(9):2981-2988. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2386-1. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
The objective of this randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) was to compare the effect of bupivacaine and articaine at habitual doses on pain intensity and the need for analgesics after lower third molar extraction.
The final study sample comprised 50 Caucasian volunteers (26 males and 24 females; age range, 18-30 years) undergoing scheduled surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar. A computer-generated random sequence was used to allocate participants to the articaine (4%) or bupivacaine (0.5%) group. Surgeons and patients were blinded by labeling the articaine and bupivacaine carpules with numbers (1 and 2, respectively). Postoperative pain intensity (primary outcome) was evaluated with a visual analogue scale (VAS), while the requirement for and timing of rescue medication and the quality of intraoperative anesthesia were also measured (secondary outcomes).
VAS-measured pain intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the articaine group than in the bupivacaine group at all time points except for 8 h post-surgery (p = 0.052). Rescue medication was required by 13 (52%) patients in the articaine group and 8 (32%) patients in the bupivacaine group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.252). The groups did not significantly differ (p = 0.391) in the quality of the intraoperative anesthesia.
Bupivacaine is a valid alternative to articaine in third molar surgery and may offer residual anesthesia as a means of reducing postoperative pain. However, further well-designed RCTs are required in larger study populations to verify the effectiveness of bupivacaine to achieve residual analgesia after oral surgery.
These findings suggest that bupivacaine may be useful as a coadjuvant to control acute postoperative pain.
ACTRN12617001138370.
本随机对照临床试验(RCT)的目的是比较惯用剂量的布比卡因和阿替卡因对下颌第三磨牙拔除后疼痛强度和镇痛需求的影响。
最终研究样本包括 50 名白种志愿者(男 26 名,女 24 名;年龄 18-30 岁),他们接受计划进行的下颌第三磨牙切开拔除手术。采用计算机生成的随机序列将参与者分配到阿替卡因(4%)或布比卡因(0.5%)组。通过将阿替卡因和布比卡因的安瓿分别标记为数字 1 和 2,对术者和患者进行盲法。术后疼痛强度(主要结局)采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估,同时还测量了镇痛需求和时机以及术中麻醉质量(次要结局)。
除术后 8 小时(p=0.052)外,阿替卡因组 VAS 测量的疼痛强度在所有时间点均显著高于布比卡因组(p<0.05)。阿替卡因组有 13 名(52%)患者需要使用解救药物,布比卡因组有 8 名(32%)患者需要使用解救药物,但差异无统计学意义(p=0.252)。两组术中麻醉质量无显著差异(p=0.391)。
布比卡因是第三磨牙手术中阿替卡因的有效替代药物,可能通过提供残留麻醉来减轻术后疼痛。然而,需要在更大的研究人群中进行进一步的精心设计的 RCT,以验证布比卡因在口腔手术后实现残留镇痛的有效性。
这些发现表明布比卡因可能作为控制急性术后疼痛的辅助药物有用。
ACTRN12617001138370。