Department of Behavioral Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Department of Health Science Research (Biostatistics), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Ann Neurol. 2018 Mar;83(3):599-611. doi: 10.1002/ana.25183. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
To assess [ F]AV-1451 tau-PET (positron emission tomography) uptake patterns across the primary progressive aphasia (PPA) variants (logopenic, semantic, and agrammatic), examine regional uptake patterns of [ F]AV-1451 independent of clinical diagnosis, and compare the diagnostic utility of [ F]AV-1451, [ F]-fluorodeoxygluclose (FDG)-PET and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) to differentiate the PPA variants.
We performed statistical parametric mapping of [ F]AV-1451 across 40 PPA patients (logopenic-PPA = 14, semantic-PPA = 13, and agrammatic-PPA = 13) compared to 80 cognitively normal, Pittsburgh compound B-negative controls, age and gender matched 2:1. Principal component analysis of regional [ F]AV-1451 tau-PET standard uptake value ratio was performed to understand underlying patterns of [ F]AV-1451 uptake independent of clinical diagnosis. Penalized multinomial regression analyses were utilized to assess diagnostic utility.
Logopenic-PPA showed striking uptake throughout neocortex, particularly temporoparietal, compared to controls, semantic-PPA, and agrammatic-PPA. Semantic-PPA and agrammatic-PPA showed milder patterns of focal [ F]AV-1451 uptake. Semantic-PPA showed elevated uptake (left>right) in anteromedial temporal lobes, compared to controls and agrammatic-PPA. Agrammatic-PPA showed elevated uptake (left>right) throughout prefrontal white matter and in subcortical gray matter structures, compared to controls and semantic-PPA. The principal component analysis of regional [ F]AV-1451 indicated two primary dimensions, a severity dimension that distinguished logopenic-PPA from agrammatic-PPA and semantic-PPA, and a frontal versus temporal contrast that distinguishes agrammatic-PPA and semantic-PPA cases. Diagnostic utility of [ F]AV-1451was superior to MRI and at least equal to FDG-PET.
[ F]AV-1451binding characteristics differ across the PPA variants and were excellent at distinguishing between the variants. [ F]AV-1451binding characteristics were as good or better than other brain imaging modalities utilized in clinical practice, suggesting that [ F]AV-1451 may have clinical diagnostic utility in PPA. Ann Neurol 2018 Ann Neurol 2018;83:599-611.
评估[ F]AV-1451 tau-PET(正电子发射断层扫描)在原发性进行性失语症(PPA)各变体(流利型、语义型和语法型)中的摄取模式,检查[ F]AV-1451 在独立于临床诊断的情况下的区域性摄取模式,并比较[ F]AV-1451、[ F]-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)-PET 和 MRI(磁共振成像)的诊断效用,以区分 PPA 变体。
我们对 40 名 PPA 患者(流利型-PPA=14 名,语义型-PPA=13 名,语法型-PPA=13 名)进行了[ F]AV-1451 的统计参数映射,与 80 名认知正常、匹兹堡复合物 B 阴性对照者,年龄和性别匹配 2:1。对区域性[ F]AV-1451 tau-PET 标准摄取比值进行主成分分析,以了解[ F]AV-1451 摄取的潜在模式,而不受临床诊断的影响。利用惩罚多项回归分析评估诊断效用。
与对照组、语义型 PPA 和语法型 PPA 相比,流利型 PPA 显示出整个新皮质,特别是颞顶叶的摄取显著增加。语义型 PPA 和语法型 PPA 显示出更轻微的局灶性[ F]AV-1451 摄取模式。语义型 PPA 在前后内侧颞叶的摄取(左侧>右侧)高于对照组和语法型 PPA。语法型 PPA 在额前白质和皮质下灰质结构中的摄取(左侧>右侧)高于对照组和语义型 PPA。区域性[ F]AV-1451 的主成分分析表明存在两个主要维度,一个是区分流利型 PPA 和语法型 PPA 及语义型 PPA 的严重程度维度,另一个是区分语法型 PPA 和语义型 PPA 病例的额颞对比维度。[ F]AV-1451 的诊断效用优于 MRI,至少与 FDG-PET 相当。
[ F]AV-1451 在 PPA 各变体中的结合特征不同,对各变体的区分非常出色。[ F]AV-1451 的结合特征与临床实践中使用的其他脑成像方式一样好或更好,表明[ F]AV-1451 可能在 PPA 中具有临床诊断效用。