• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分在结直肠手术中作为发病率和死亡率预测指标的适用性。

The applicability of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scores as predictors of morbidity and mortality in colorectal surgery.

作者信息

Carvalho-E-Carvalho Maria Emília, DE-Queiroz Fábio Lopes, Martins-DA-Costa Breno Xaia, Werneck-Côrtes Marcelo Giusti, Pires-Rodrigues Vinícius

机构信息

Coloproctology Clinic, Felício Rocho Hospital, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Col Bras Cir. 2018;45(1):e1347. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20181347. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1590/0100-6991e-20181347
PMID:29451643
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to apply the POSSUM and P-POSSUM scores as a tool to predict morbidity and mortality in colorectal surgery.

METHODS

we conducted a prospective cohort study of 551 patients submitted to colorectal surgery in a colorectal surgery tertiary referral hospital in Brazil. We grouped patients into pre-established risk categories for comparison between expected and observed morbidity and mortality rates by the POSSUM and P-POSSUM scores.

RESULTS

in the POSSUM morbidity analysis, the overall expected morbidity was significantly higher than that observed (39.2% vs. 15.6%). The same occurred with patients grouped in categories II (28.9% x 10.5) and III (64.6% x 24.5%). In category I, the expected and observed morbidities were similar (13.7% x 9.1%). Regarding the evaluation of mortality, it was statistically higher than that observed in category III patients and in the total number of patients (11.3% vs. 5.6%). In categories I and II, we observed the same pattern of category III, but without statistical significance. When evaluating mortality by the P-POSSUM score, the overall expected and observed mortality was similar (5.8% x 5.6%). Of the 31 patients who died, 20.2% underwent emergency procedures and sepsis was the main cause of death.

CONCLUSION

the P-POSSUM score was an accurate tool to predict mortality and could be safely used in this population profile, unlike the POSSUM score.

摘要

目的

应用POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分作为预测结直肠手术发病率和死亡率的工具。

方法

我们在巴西一家结直肠手术三级转诊医院对551例行结直肠手术的患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。我们将患者分为预先设定的风险类别,以通过POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分比较预期和观察到的发病率及死亡率。

结果

在POSSUM发病率分析中,总体预期发病率显著高于观察到的发病率(39.2%对15.6%)。在II类(28.9%对10.5%)和III类(64.6%对24.5%)分组的患者中也出现了同样情况。在I类中,预期发病率和观察到的发病率相似(13.7%对9.1%)。关于死亡率评估,在III类患者和患者总数中,预期死亡率在统计学上高于观察到的死亡率(11.3%对5.6%)。在I类和II类中,我们观察到与III类相同的模式,但无统计学意义。当通过P-POSSUM评分评估死亡率时,总体预期死亡率和观察到的死亡率相似(5.8%对5.6%)。在31例死亡患者中,20.2%接受了急诊手术,败血症是主要死亡原因。

结论

与POSSUM评分不同,P-POSSUM评分是预测死亡率的准确工具,可安全用于该人群。

相似文献

1
The applicability of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scores as predictors of morbidity and mortality in colorectal surgery.POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分在结直肠手术中作为发病率和死亡率预测指标的适用性。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2018;45(1):e1347. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20181347. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
2
A comparison of POSSUM, P-POSSUM and colorectal POSSUM for the prediction of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing colorectal resection.对接受结直肠切除术患者术后死亡率预测的POSSUM、P-POSSUM和结直肠POSSUM评分系统的比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Mar;49(3):330-5. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0290-7.
3
Predictive value of POSSUM and ACPGBI scoring in mortality and morbidity of colorectal resection: a case-control study. POSSUM 和 ACPGBI 评分对结直肠切除术死亡率和发病率的预测价值:病例对照研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Feb;15(2):294-303. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1354-0. Epub 2010 Oct 9.
4
Risk-adjusted scoring systems in colorectal surgery.结直肠外科手术中的风险调整评分系统。
Int J Surg. 2011;9(2):130-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.10.016. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
5
Evaluation of P-POSSUM in surgery for obstructing colorectal cancer and correlation of the predicted mortality with different surgical options.P-POSSUM在梗阻性结直肠癌手术中的评估以及预测死亡率与不同手术方式的相关性
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Mar;48(3):493-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0766-x.
6
Mortality rate prediction by Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM), Portsmouth POSSUM and Colorectal POSSUM and the development of new scoring systems in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.应用生理和手术严重程度评分系统(POSSUM)、朴茨茅斯POSSUM及结直肠POSSUM预测中国结直肠癌患者的死亡率,并开发新的评分系统。
Am J Surg. 2009 Jul;198(1):31-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.044. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
7
Evaluating operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: ASA and POSSUM-based predictive models.评估结直肠癌手术的手术风险:基于美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)和朴茨茅斯评分系统(POSSUM)的预测模型
Surg Oncol. 2004 Aug-Nov;13(2-3):83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2004.08.006.
8
Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.结直肠手术患者中POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分系统的评估
Br J Surg. 2003 Mar;90(3):340-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4037.
9
Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity and modified Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity for the mortality prediction among nonagenarians undergoing emergency surgery.用于评估急诊手术老年患者死亡率和发病率的生理与手术严重程度评分以及改良的用于评估急诊手术老年患者死亡率和发病率的生理与手术严重程度评分,用于死亡率预测。
J Surg Res. 2017 Apr;210:198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.11.040. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
10
Comparison of different scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery for predicting mortality and morbidity.比较不同评分系统在接受结直肠癌手术患者中预测死亡率和发病率的情况。
Indian J Cancer. 2014 Oct-Dec;51(4):543-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.175318.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison between Glasgow prognostic criteria and O-POSSUM/ P-POSSUM physiological indices in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma and the occurrency of early postoperative complications.胃腺癌患者行胃切除术的格拉斯哥预后标准与 O-POSSUM/P-POSSUM 生理指标比较及术后早期并发症发生情况。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2024 Jul 5;51:e20243662. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20243662-en. eCollection 2024.
2
More than 30 Years of POSSUM: Are Scoring Systems Still Relevant Today for Colorectal Surgery?POSSUM 30 多年:评分系统如今对结直肠手术仍有意义吗?
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 28;13(1):173. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010173.
3
Use of POSSUM (Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the Study of Mortality and Morbidity) and Portsmouth-POSSUM for Surgical Assessment in Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgeries.
使用POSSUM(用于死亡率和发病率研究的生理和手术严重程度评分)及朴茨茅斯-POSSUM对接受急诊腹部手术的患者进行手术评估。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 23;15(6):e40850. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40850. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Prediction of morbidity and mortality after early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: results of the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study.早期胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的发病率和死亡率预测:S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C.研究结果。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Mar 18;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00488-6.
5
Validity of P-POSSUM in adult cancer surgery (PACS).成人癌症手术(PACS)中P-POSSUM的有效性
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jan-Mar;38(1):61-65. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_128_20. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
6
Development of a preoperative risk score on admission in surgical intermediate care unit in gastrointestinal cancer surgery.胃肠道癌手术患者入住外科中级护理单元时术前风险评分的制定
Perioper Med (Lond). 2020 Aug 6;9:23. doi: 10.1186/s13741-020-00151-7. eCollection 2020.
7
Application of POSSUM and P-POSSUM in Surgical Risk Assessment of Elderly Patients Undergoing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery. POSSUM 和 P-POSSUM 在肝胆胰外科老年患者手术风险评估中的应用。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Jul 12;15:1121-1128. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S258659. eCollection 2020.
8
A multicomponent prehabilitation pathway to reduce the incidence of delirium in elderly patients in need of major abdominal surgery: study protocol for a before-and-after study.多组分术前康复途径减少需要接受大型腹部手术的老年患者发生谵妄的发生率:一项前后研究的研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 20;19(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1101-7.