• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用免疫细胞化学检测细胞学标本中的 ROS1 阳性非小细胞肺癌。

Detection of ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer on cytological specimens using immunocytochemistry.

机构信息

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Cancer Cytopathol. 2018 Jun;126(6):421-429. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21983. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1002/cncy.21983
PMID:29451745
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rearrangements of the ROS1 oncogene are found in 1% to 2% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and are regarded as mutually exclusive oncogenic driver mutations. Since the approval of targeted therapy for ROS1-positive NSCLC, ROS1 testing has become a part of the diagnostic routine. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), optionally selected for by immunohistochemistry on histological material, is a common practice for the detection of ROS1 rearrangements. However, NSCLC often is diagnosed by cytology alone, requiring predictive marker testing on cytological specimens. In the current study, the authors explored the accuracy of ROS1 immunocytochemistry (ICC) on non-cell block cytological specimens for the detection of ROS1 rearrangements.

METHODS

ICC using the D4D6 antibody on an automated immunostainer was performed prospectively in the routine diagnostic setting on cytological specimens from 295 patients with NSCLC, including adenocarcinoma (241 patients), NSCLC not otherwise specified (50 patients), and other malignancies (4 patients). Any immunostaining was considered positive.

RESULTS

ICC was positive in all 13 ROS1-rearranged NSCLC cases confirmed by FISH (12 cases) or next-generation sequencing (1 case). Confirmation of 282 ICC-negative cases was available for 208 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for ROS1 ICC compared with the final ROS1 status all were 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

ROS1 ICC is an accurate method for the detection of ROS1 rearrangements in NSCLC. Given the high costs and technical challenges of FISH and the rarity of ROS1 rearrangements, ICC is rapid and therefore well suited as a screening method. Cases with equivocal or positive findings on ICC can be confirmed by FISH or molecular tests. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:421-9. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

ROS1 癌基因重排存在于 1%至 2%的非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 中,被认为是相互排斥的致癌驱动突变。自针对 ROS1 阳性 NSCLC 的靶向治疗获得批准以来,ROS1 检测已成为诊断常规的一部分。荧光原位杂交 (FISH) 是检测 ROS1 重排的常用方法,可根据组织学材料的免疫组织化学选择进行。然而,NSCLC 通常仅通过细胞学诊断,需要对细胞学标本进行预测性标志物检测。在本研究中,作者探讨了 ROS1 免疫细胞化学 (ICC) 在非细胞块细胞学标本中检测 ROS1 重排的准确性。

方法

在常规诊断环境中,使用 D4D6 抗体在自动化免疫染色仪上对 295 例 NSCLC 患者的细胞学标本进行前瞻性 ICC,包括腺癌 (241 例)、非特指型 NSCLC (50 例) 和其他恶性肿瘤 (4 例)。任何免疫染色均被视为阳性。

结果

13 例经 FISH (12 例) 或下一代测序 (1 例) 证实的 ROS1 重排 NSCLC 病例的 ICC 均为阳性。208 例中有 282 例 ICC 阴性病例的确认结果可用。与最终 ROS1 状态相比,ROS1 ICC 的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值均为 100%。

结论

ROS1 ICC 是检测 NSCLC 中 ROS1 重排的一种准确方法。鉴于 FISH 的高成本和技术挑战以及 ROS1 重排的罕见性,ICC 快速且因此非常适合作为筛选方法。ICC 结果不确定或阳性的病例可通过 FISH 或分子检测进行确认。癌症细胞病理学 2018;126:421-9。© 2018 美国癌症协会。

相似文献

1
Detection of ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer on cytological specimens using immunocytochemistry.使用免疫细胞化学检测细胞学标本中的 ROS1 阳性非小细胞肺癌。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2018 Jun;126(6):421-429. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21983. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
2
ALK and ROS1 rearrangements tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization in cytological smears from advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.在晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的细胞学涂片上,通过荧光原位杂交检测ALK和ROS1重排。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2015 Nov;43(11):941-6. doi: 10.1002/dc.23318. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
3
On the relevance of a testing algorithm for the detection of ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas.ROS1 重排肺腺癌检测中检测算法的相关性。
Lung Cancer. 2014 Feb;83(2):168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
4
Evaluation of a Dual ALK/ROS1 Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Test in Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer.评估一种用于非小细胞肺癌的双 ALK/ROS1 荧光原位杂交检测。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Sep;19(5):e647-e653. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 May 5.
5
Concordance of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in the Detection of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) and Ros Proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) Gene Rearrangements in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: A 4.5-Year Experience Highlighting Challenges and Pitfalls.免疫组织化学与荧光原位杂交检测非小细胞肺癌中间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)和 Ros 原癌基因 1(ROS1)基因重排的一致性:4.5 年的经验强调了挑战和陷阱。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2024 Aug 1;148(8):928-937. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0229-OA.
6
Screening for ROS1 gene rearrangements in non-small-cell lung cancers using immunohistochemistry with FISH confirmation is an effective method to identify this rare target.使用免疫组织化学结合荧光原位杂交(FISH)确认来筛查非小细胞肺癌中的ROS1基因重排,是识别这一罕见靶点的有效方法。
Histopathology. 2017 Feb;70(3):402-411. doi: 10.1111/his.13076. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
7
Validation of ROS1 by immunohistochemistry against fluorescent in situ hybridisation on cytology and small biopsy samples in a large teaching hospital.在一所大型教学医院中,使用免疫组织化学法对细胞学和小活检样本进行荧光原位杂交(FISH),以验证 ROS1 的表达。
Cytopathology. 2021 Sep;32(5):621-630. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12994. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
8
Multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridisation to detect anaplastic lymphoma kinase and ROS proto-oncogene 1 receptor tyrosine kinase rearrangements in lung cancer cytological samples.多色荧光原位杂交检测肺癌细胞学样本中间变性淋巴瘤激酶和 ROS 原癌基因 1 受体酪氨酸激酶重排。
J Clin Pathol. 2020 Feb;73(2):96-101. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2019-206152. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
9
ROS1 rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer: screening by immunohistochemistry using proportion of cells staining without intensity and excluding cases with MAPK pathway drivers improves test performance.ROS1 重排非小细胞肺癌:免疫组织化学方法检测细胞染色比例(不计染色强度)且排除 MAPK 通路驱动基因阳性病例可提高检测效能。
Pathology. 2022 Apr;54(3):279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
10
Comparison between Immunocytochemistry, FISH and NGS for and Rearrangement Detection in Cytological Samples.免疫细胞化学、FISH 和 NGS 在细胞学样本中检测 和 重排的比较。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;23(18):10556. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810556.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic and Predictive Immunocytochemistry in Lung Cancer.肺癌的诊断与预测性免疫细胞化学
Acta Cytol. 2025;69(1):69-76. doi: 10.1159/000541478. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Biomarker testing of cytology specimens in personalized medicine for lung cancer patients.肺癌患者个性化医疗中细胞学标本的生物标志物检测。
J Pathol Transl Med. 2022 Nov;56(6):326-333. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2022.10.17. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
3
[Predictive immunocytochemistry in non-small cell lung carcinoma].[非小细胞肺癌中的预测性免疫细胞化学]
Pathologe. 2022 May;43(3):222-228. doi: 10.1007/s00292-022-01066-4. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
4
Clinical characteristics of patients with gene rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.非小细胞肺癌基因重排患者的临床特征:一项荟萃分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Jul;9(7):4383-4392. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-1813.
5
Novel cytological model for the identification of early oral cancer diagnostic markers: The carcinoma sequence model.用于鉴定早期口腔癌诊断标志物的新型细胞学模型:癌序列模型。
Oncol Lett. 2022 Mar;23(3):76. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13196. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
6
Molecular Testing on Cytology for Gene Fusion Detection.用于基因融合检测的细胞病理学分子检测
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 6;8:643113. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.643113. eCollection 2021.
7
Immunocytochemistry of cytology specimens for predictive biomarkers in lung cancer.用于肺癌预测生物标志物的细胞学标本免疫细胞化学。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Jun;9(3):898-905. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.12.31.
8
High feasibility of cytological specimens for detection of fusion by reverse transcriptase PCR in Chinese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.在中国晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中,通过逆转录聚合酶链反应检测融合的细胞学标本具有高度可行性。
Onco Targets Ther. 2019 May 1;12:3305-3311. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S198827. eCollection 2019.
9
Immunocytochemistry for predictive biomarker testing in lung cancer cytology.肺癌细胞学中预测性生物标志物检测的免疫细胞化学。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2019 May;127(5):325-339. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22137. Epub 2019 May 3.
10
Tru-cut/core Biopsy versus FNAC: Pulmonary Tumors.粗针/芯针活检与细针穿刺抽吸活检:肺部肿瘤
J Cytol. 2018 Jul-Sep;35(3):183-186. doi: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_73_18.