Sando Ian C, Plott Jeffrey S, McCracken Brendan M, Tiba Mohamad H, Ward Kevin R, Kozlow Jeffrey H, Cederna Paul S, Momoh Adeyiza O
Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Jul;34(6):420-427. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1626691. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
A novel arterial everter device was engineered to simplify microvascular coupling of arteries by reliably securing the stiff, muscular wall of arteries over coupler pins. We compare microvascular coupling with the everter device to manual suturing for arterial anastomoses in a live large animal model.
In this preliminary study, bilateral external femoral arteries of five male swine were exposed and sharply divided. Arteries were anastomosed using either interrupted sutures ( = 5) or the everter device and Synovis Coupler ( = 5). The efficiency in engaging coupler pins, the time taken to perform the anastomosis, and vessel patency immediately post-op and at 1-week postanastomosis were evaluated. Vessel wall injury and luminal stenosis were compared between groups using histomorphometric analyses.
On an average, 80% of coupler pins engaged the vessel walls after a single pass of the everter. The average time to perform the anastomosis was significantly less when using the everter/coupler compared with manual suturing (6:35 minutes versus 25:09 minutes, < 0.001). Immediately post-op, 100% patency was observed in both groups. At 1 week post-op, four of five (80%) of coupled arteries and all five (100%) of hand-sewn arteries were patent. The degree of arterial wall injury, neointimal formation, and luminal stenosis for patent arteries were similar between groups.
Successful arterial anastomoses using the everter device with the Synovis Coupler was easier and significantly more efficient when compared with a standard hand-sewn technique. Both techniques had acceptable patency rates and similar effects on the vessel wall and intima.
设计了一种新型动脉外翻装置,通过将僵硬的动脉肌性壁可靠地固定在耦合销上,简化动脉的微血管耦合。我们在大型活体动物模型中比较了使用外翻装置进行微血管耦合与手工缝合动脉吻合术的效果。
在这项初步研究中,暴露5只雄性猪的双侧股外动脉并锐性离断。动脉吻合采用间断缝合(n = 5)或外翻装置及Synovis耦合器(n = 5)。评估耦合销的接合效率、进行吻合所需时间以及术后即刻和吻合术后1周时的血管通畅情况。使用组织形态计量分析比较两组之间的血管壁损伤和管腔狭窄情况。
平均而言,外翻器单次通过后,80%的耦合销与血管壁接合。与手工缝合相比,使用外翻器/耦合器进行吻合的平均时间显著缩短(6分35秒对25分09秒,P < 0.001)。术后即刻,两组均观察到100%的通畅率。术后1周时,5条耦合动脉中有4条(80%)和所有5条手工缝合动脉(100%)保持通畅。两组中通畅动脉的动脉壁损伤程度、新生内膜形成和管腔狭窄情况相似。
与标准手工缝合技术相比,使用外翻装置和Synovis耦合器成功进行动脉吻合更容易且效率显著更高。两种技术的通畅率均可接受,对血管壁和内膜的影响相似。