Technical University of Liberec, Institute for Nanomaterials, Advanced Technologies and Innovation, Faculty of Mechatronics, Informatics and Multidisciplinary Studies, Studentská 2, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.
University of Geneva, Faculty of Sciences, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Department for Environmental and Aquatic Sciences, Uni Carl Vogt, 66 Bvd Carl Vogt, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018 Jun 15;154:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.027. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
As nanoremediation strategies for in-situ groundwater treatment extend beyond nanoiron-based applications to adsorption and oxidation, ecotoxicological evaluations of newly developed materials are required. The biological effects of four new materials with different iron (Fe) speciations ([i] FerMEG12 - pristine flake-like milled Fe(0) nanoparticles (nZVI), [ii] Carbo-Iron - Fe(0)-nanoclusters containing activated carbon (AC) composite, [iii] Trap-Ox® Fe-BEA35 (Fe-zeolite) - Fe-doped zeolite, and [iv] Nano-Goethite - 'pure' FeOOH) were studied using the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas sp. as a model test system. Algal growth rate, chlorophyll fluorescence, efficiency of photosystem II, membrane integrity and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation were assessed following exposure to 10, 50 and 500 mg L of the particles for 2 h and 24 h. The particles had a concentration-, material- and time-dependent effect on Chlamydomonas sp., with increased algal growth rate after 24 h. Conversely, significant intracellular ROS levels were detected after 2 h, with much lower levels after 24 h. All Fe-nanomaterials displayed similar Z-average sizes and zeta-potentials at 2 h and 24 h. Effects on Chlamydomonas sp. decreased in the order FerMEG12 > Carbo-Iron® > Fe-zeolite > Nano-Goethite. Ecotoxicological studies were challenged due to some particle properties, i.e. dark colour, effect of constituents and a tendency to agglomerate, especially at high concentrations. All particles exhibited potential to induce significant toxicity at high concentrations (500 mg L), though such concentrations would rapidly decrease to mg or µg L in aquatic environments, levels harmless to Chlamydomonas sp. The presented findings contribute to the practical usage of particle-based nanoremediation in environmental restoration.
作为原位地下水处理的纳米修复策略,除了纳米铁基应用外,还扩展到吸附和氧化,因此需要对新开发材料进行生态毒理学评估。本研究采用单细胞绿藻衣藻作为模式测试系统,研究了四种具有不同铁(Fe)形态的新型材料([i] FerMEG12-原始片状研磨零价铁(nZVI)纳米颗粒,[ii] Carbo-Iron-含活性炭(AC)复合的 Fe(0)-纳米簇,[iii] Trap-Ox® Fe-BEA35(Fe-沸石)-掺杂沸石的 Fe,以及 [iv] Nano-Goethite-“纯”FeOOH)的生物效应。在暴露于 10、50 和 500 mg/L 颗粒 2 h 和 24 h 后,评估了藻类生长率、叶绿素荧光、光系统 II 效率、膜完整性和活性氧物种(ROS)的产生。颗粒对衣藻具有浓度、材料和时间依赖性影响,24 h 后藻类生长率增加。相反,在 2 h 时检测到显著的细胞内 ROS 水平,而在 24 h 时则降低了许多。在 2 h 和 24 h 时,所有 Fe 纳米材料均显示出相似的 Z 均粒径和 ζ 电位。对衣藻的影响顺序为 FerMEG12 > Carbo-Iron® > Fe-zeolite > Nano-Goethite。由于一些颗粒特性,如暗颜色、成分的影响和团聚的趋势,生态毒理学研究受到挑战,尤其是在高浓度下。所有颗粒在高浓度(500 mg/L)下都表现出潜在的显著毒性,但在水生环境中,这些浓度会迅速降低至 mg 或 µg/L,对衣藻无害。研究结果有助于基于颗粒的纳米修复在环境修复中的实际应用。