Suppr超能文献

RECORD-4 多中心 2 期试验:二线依维莫司治疗转移性肾细胞癌患者:亚洲人群与非亚洲人群亚组分析。

RECORD-4 multicenter phase 2 trial of second-line everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Asian versus non-Asian population subanalysis.

机构信息

National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuannanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.

Prevoljskiy Region Medical Centre, Ilinskaua St, N, Novgorod, 603109, Russia.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4091-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

RECORD-4 assessed everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who progressed after 1 prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or cytokine and reinforced the clinical benefit of second-line everolimus. Because of the high percentage of patients from China enrolled in RECORD-4 (41%) and some reported differences in responses to certain targeted agents between Chinese and Western patients, this subanalysis evaluated outcomes in Asian versus non-Asian patients.

METHODS

RECORD-4 enrolled patients with clear cell mRCC into 3 cohorts based on prior first-line therapy: sunitinib, other anti-VEGF (sorafenib, bevacizumab, pazopanib, other), or cytokines. Patients received everolimus 10 mg/d until progression of disease (RECIST, v1.0) or intolerance. Primary end point was progression-free survival per investigator review. Data cutoff was Sept 1, 2014.

RESULTS

Among Asian (n = 55) versus non-Asian (n = 79) patients, 98% versus 84% had good/intermediate MSKCC prognosis; 73% versus 65% were men, and 85% versus 73% were < 65 years of age. All (100%) Asian patients were of Chinese ethnicity. Median duration of exposure was 5.5 mo for Asian and 6.0 mo for non-Asian patients. Among Asian versus non-Asian patients, median progression-free survival (months) was 7.4 versus 7.8 overall, 7.4 versus 4.0 with prior sunitinib, and 5.7 versus 9.2 with prior other anti-VEGFs. Clinical benefit rate was similar between populations: 74.5% (95% CI 61.0-85.3) for Asian patients and 74.7% (95% CI 63.6-83.8) for non-Asian patients. Most patients achieved stable disease as best overall response (Asian, 63.6%; non-Asian, 69.6%). Overall rate of grade 3/4 adverse events appeared similar for Asian (58%) and non-Asian patients (54%).

CONCLUSIONS

This RECORD-4 subanalysis demonstrated comparable efficacy and adverse event profiles of second-line everolimus in Asian and non-Asian patients. Efficacy and safety outcomes by prior therapy should be interpreted with caution because of small patient numbers in some subpopulations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Everolimus as Second-line Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell. Carcinoma (RECORD-4); ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01491672 . Registration date: December 14, 2011.

摘要

背景

RECORD-4 评估了依维莫司在先前接受过 1 种抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)或细胞因子治疗后进展的转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者中的应用,该研究结果进一步证实了二线依维莫司治疗的临床获益。由于 RECORD-4 研究中入组了大量中国患者(41%),并且有报道称中国和西方患者对某些靶向药物的反应存在差异,因此本亚组分析评估了亚洲患者和非亚洲患者的结局。

方法

RECORD-4 研究根据患者先前的一线治疗方案将 clear cell mRCC 患者纳入 3 个队列:舒尼替尼、其他抗 VEGF(索拉非尼、贝伐珠单抗、帕唑帕尼、其他)或细胞因子。患者接受依维莫司 10mg/d 治疗,直至疾病进展(RECIST,v1.0)或不耐受。主要终点为研究者评估的无进展生存期。数据截止日期为 2014 年 9 月 1 日。

结果

在亚洲(n=55)患者和非亚洲(n=79)患者中,98%和 84%的患者 MSKCC 预后良好/中等;73%和 65%为男性,85%和 73%的患者年龄<65 岁。所有(100%)亚洲患者均为中国人种。亚洲患者和非亚洲患者的中位暴露时间分别为 5.5 个月和 6.0 个月。在亚洲患者和非亚洲患者中,中位无进展生存期(月)分别为 7.4 个月和 7.8 个月(总体)、7.4 个月和 4.0 个月(既往舒尼替尼治疗)、5.7 个月和 9.2 个月(既往其他抗 VEGF 治疗)。两组患者的临床获益率相似:亚洲患者为 74.5%(95%CI 61.0-85.3),非亚洲患者为 74.7%(95%CI 63.6-83.8)。大多数患者的最佳总体缓解为疾病稳定(亚洲患者 63.6%,非亚洲患者 69.6%)。亚洲患者(58%)和非亚洲患者(54%)的 3/4 级不良事件发生率相似。

结论

本 RECORD-4 亚组分析结果表明,二线依维莫司在亚洲患者和非亚洲患者中的疗效和不良事件谱相似。由于某些亚组患者人数较少,应谨慎解释先前治疗的疗效和安全性结果。

试验注册

依维莫司作为转移性肾细胞癌的二线治疗(RECORD-4);临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT01491672;注册日期:2011 年 12 月 14 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8406/5816475/8db8e304b2ee/12885_2018_4091_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验