Quicke Jonathan G, Foster Nadine E, Croft Peter R, Ogollah Reuben O, Holden Melanie A
Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Feb 17;19(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1968-z.
Exercise interventions improve clinical outcomes of pain and function in adults with knee pain due to osteoarthritis and higher levels of physical activity are associated with lower severity of pain and higher levels of physical functioning in older adults with knee osteoarthritis in cross-sectional studies. However, to date no studies have investigated if change in physical activity level during exercise interventions can explain clinical outcomes of pain and function. This study aimed to investigate if change in physical activity during exercise interventions is associated with future pain and physical function in older adults with knee pain.
Secondary longitudinal data analyses of a three armed exercise intervention randomised controlled trial. Participants were adults with knee pain attributed to osteoarthritis, over the age of 45 years old (n = 514) from Primary Care Services in the Midlands and Northwest regions of England. Crude and adjusted associations between absolute change in physical activity from baseline to 3 months (measured by the self-report Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE)) and i) pain ii) physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) and iii) treatment response (OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria) at 3 and 6 months follow-up were investigated using linear and logistic regression.
Change in physical activity level was not associated with future pain, function or treatment response outcomes in crude or adjusted models at 3 or 6 months (P > 0.05). A 10 point increase in PASE was not associated with pain β = - 0.01 (- 0.05, 0.02), physical function β = - 0.09 (- 0.19, 0.02) or likelihood (odds ratio) of treatment response 1.02 (0.99, 1.04) at 3 months adjusting for sociodemographics, clinical covariates and the trial intervention arm. Findings were similar for 6 month outcome models.
Change in physical activity did not explain future clinical outcomes of pain and function in this study. Other factors may be responsible for clinical improvements following exercise interventions. However, the PASE may not be sufficiently responsive to measure change in physical activity level. We also recommend further investigation into the responsiveness of commonly used physical activity measures.
( ISRCTN93634563 ). Registered 29th September 2011.
运动干预可改善因骨关节炎导致膝关节疼痛的成年人的疼痛和功能临床结局,在横断面研究中,较高水平的身体活动与膝关节骨关节炎老年患者较低的疼痛严重程度和较高的身体功能水平相关。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究调查运动干预期间身体活动水平的变化是否能解释疼痛和功能的临床结局。本研究旨在调查运动干预期间身体活动的变化是否与膝关节疼痛老年患者未来的疼痛和身体功能相关。
对一项三臂运动干预随机对照试验进行二次纵向数据分析。参与者为来自英格兰中部和西北部地区初级保健服务机构的45岁以上因骨关节炎导致膝关节疼痛的成年人(n = 514)。采用线性和逻辑回归分析从基线到3个月身体活动的绝对变化(通过自我报告的老年人身体活动量表(PASE)测量)与以下各项之间的粗略和调整后的关联:i)疼痛;ii)身体功能(西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数);iii)在3个月和6个月随访时的治疗反应(OMERACT - OARSI反应标准)。
在3个月或6个月时,身体活动水平的变化在粗略或调整模型中均与未来的疼痛、功能或治疗反应结局无关(P > 0.05)。在调整社会人口统计学、临床协变量和试验干预组后,3个月时PASE增加10分与疼痛β = -0.01(-0.05,0.02)、身体功能β = -0.09(-0.19,0.02)或治疗反应的可能性(比值比)1.02(0.99,1.04)无关。6个月结局模型的结果相似。
在本研究中,身体活动的变化无法解释未来疼痛和功能的临床结局。运动干预后临床改善可能由其他因素导致。然而,PASE可能对测量身体活动水平的变化反应不够灵敏。我们还建议进一步研究常用身体活动测量方法的反应性。
(ISRCTN93634563)。2011年9月29日注册。