Norwegian Research Center for Active Rehabilitation (NAR), Department of Orthopedics, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0407 Oslo, Norway.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Sep 12;14:266. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-266.
Despite an extensive literature on treatment interventions for patients with knee osteoarthritis, studies comparing the efficacy of different exercise interventions and living the life as usual on quality of life, cartilage quality and cost-effectiveness are lacking. The aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy of two different exercise programs compared to a control group in individuals with established radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis on self-reported knee-related quality of life, knee pain, physical function, and cartilage quality.
METHODS/DESIGN: A three-armed randomized controlled trial involving two exercise interventions and a control group of individuals doing as they usually do is described. The patients will have mild to moderate radiographic osteoarthritis according to the Kellgren and Lawrence classification (grade 2-3), and fulfill the American College of Rheumatology clinical criteria, be aged between 45 and 65 years, and have no other serious physical or mental illnesses. The patients will be randomly allocated to a strength exercise group; a cycling group, or a control group. The primary outcome is the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score knee-related quality of life subscale. Secondary outcomes include all five Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, morphological evaluation of cartilage including focal thickness, subchondral bone marrow edema, proteoglycan content and collagen degradation (measured using magnetic resonance imaging clinical sequences, T2 mapping and T1ρ), specific serum biomarkers, isokinetic muscle strength, maximal oxygen uptake, quality of life (EuroQol 5D), and self-efficacy (Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale). A sample size calculation on the primary outcome showed that 207 individuals, 69 in each group, is needed to detect a clinically relevant difference of 10 points with 80% power and a significance level of 5%. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 14 weeks, 1 year and 2 years post-randomization. The interventions will be a 14 weeks exercise program.
Although exercise therapy has been found to be effective in knee osteoarthritis, the knowledge of the underlying mechanisms for why exercise works is lacking. This study will contribute with knowledge on the efficacy of strength exercise versus cycling on patient-reported outcomes, cartilage quality and cost-effectiveness.
Clinicaltrial.gov Identifier: NCT01682980.
尽管有大量关于治疗膝骨关节炎患者的干预措施的文献,但缺乏比较不同运动干预措施和常规生活对生活质量、软骨质量和成本效益的疗效的研究。本研究旨在比较两种不同运动方案与对照组在影像学和症状性膝骨关节炎患者中的疗效,比较自我报告的膝关节相关生活质量、膝关节疼痛、身体功能和软骨质量。
方法/设计:描述了一项涉及两种运动干预措施和对照组的三臂随机对照试验。患者将根据 Kellgren 和 Lawrence 分类(等级 2-3)具有轻度至中度放射影像学骨关节炎,并符合美国风湿病学会临床标准,年龄在 45 岁至 65 岁之间,没有其他严重的身体或精神疾病。患者将被随机分配到力量锻炼组、自行车组或对照组。主要结局是膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分膝关节相关生活质量子量表。次要结局包括所有五个膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分子量表、软骨形态评估,包括局灶性厚度、软骨下骨髓水肿、糖胺聚糖含量和胶原降解(使用磁共振成像临床序列、T2 映射和 T1ρ 测量)、特定血清生物标志物、等速肌力、最大摄氧量、生活质量(EuroQol 5D)和自我效能(关节炎自我效能量表)。对主要结局进行的样本量计算表明,需要 207 名参与者,每组 69 名,才能以 80%的功效和 5%的显著性水平检测到 10 分的临床相关差异。评估将在基线、14 周、1 年和 2 年随机分组后进行。干预措施将是 14 周的运动计划。
尽管运动疗法已被证明对膝骨关节炎有效,但缺乏对运动为何有效的潜在机制的了解。本研究将提供关于力量运动与自行车对患者报告的结果、软骨质量和成本效益的疗效的知识。
Clinicaltrial.gov 标识符:NCT01682980。