Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Jun;17(2):e293-e305. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
Colorectal cancer (CRC), one of the most common cancers, is a major public health issue globally, especially in Westernized countries. Up to 35% of CRCs are thought to be due to heritable factors, but currently only 5% to 10% of CRCs are attributable to high-risk mutations in known CRC susceptibility genes, predominantly the mismatch repair genes (Lynch syndrome) and adenomatous polyposis coli gene (APC; familial adenomatous polyposis). In this era of precision medicine, high-risk mutation carriers, when identified, can be offered various risk management options that prevent cancers and improve survival, including risk-reducing medication, screening for early detection, and surgery. The practice of clinical genetics is currently transitioning from phenotype-directed single gene testing to multigene panels, now offered by numerous providers. For CRC, the genes included across these panels vary, ranging from well established, clinically actionable susceptibility genes with quantified magnitude of risk, to genes that lack extensive validation or have less evidence of association with CRC and, therefore, have minimal clinical utility. The current lack of consensus regarding inclusion of genes in CRC panels presents challenges in patient counseling and management, particularly when a variant in a less validated gene is identified. Furthermore, there remain considerable challenges regarding variant interpretation even for the well established CRC susceptibility genes. Ironically though, only through more widespread testing and the accumulation of large international data sets will sufficient information be generated to (i) enable well powered studies to determine if a gene is associated with CRC susceptibility, (ii) to develop better models for variant interpretation and (iii) to facilitate clinical translation.
结直肠癌(CRC)是最常见的癌症之一,是全球主要的公共卫生问题,尤其是在西方国家。多达 35%的 CRC 被认为是由遗传因素引起的,但目前只有 5%至 10%的 CRC 归因于已知 CRC 易感性基因中的高风险突变,主要是错配修复基因(Lynch 综合征)和腺瘤性结肠息肉基因(APC;家族性腺瘤性息肉病)。在精准医学时代,当发现高风险突变携带者时,可以为他们提供各种预防癌症和提高生存率的风险管理选择,包括降低风险的药物、早期检测筛查和手术。临床遗传学的实践目前正在从表型导向的单基因测试向多基因面板转变,现在许多供应商都提供多基因面板检测。对于 CRC,这些面板中包含的基因各不相同,从具有明确风险量化程度的既定、具有临床可操作性的易感性基因,到缺乏广泛验证或与 CRC 关联证据较少的基因,因此临床实用性很小。目前 CRC 面板中纳入基因缺乏共识,这给患者咨询和管理带来了挑战,特别是当发现不太有效的基因中的变异时。此外,即使对于既定的 CRC 易感性基因,变异解释也存在相当大的挑战。具有讽刺意味的是,只有通过更广泛的测试和积累大型国际数据集,才能生成足够的信息,以确定(i)某个基因是否与 CRC 易感性相关,(ii)为变异解释开发更好的模型,以及(iii)促进临床转化。