Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems Research Division, Centre for Dairy Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Whiteknights Road, Reading, RG6 6AR, United Kingdom.
Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems Research Division, Centre for Dairy Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Whiteknights Road, Reading, RG6 6AR, United Kingdom.
J Dairy Sci. 2018 May;101(5):4180-4192. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13926. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
The objectives of the study were (1) to test whether 6 h of feed deprivation followed by refeeding induces an acidosis challenge in dairy cattle and (2) to quantify the acidosis challenge mitigation potential of increased alfalfa silage concentration in the diet. Alfalfa silage constituted either 25 or 75% of forage dry matter (DM) replacing corn silage [low (LA) or high alfalfa (HA)] and was chopped to either 14 or 19 mm theoretical length [short (S) or long (L)]. Dietary treatments LAS, LAL, HAS, or HAL were offered to 4 rumen-cannulated Holstein dairy cattle (161 d in milk; 5th or 6th parity) in a 4 × 4 Latin square design study with 21-d periods. Starch concentration was 69 g/kg of DM higher for LA diets than HA diets. Feed was withheld for 6 h followed by ad libitum refeeding on d 18 of each period. Measurements of DM intake, milk yield and composition, rumen pH, and eating and rumination behavior were taken on 1 baseline day, the challenge day, and 2 further recovery days. After refeeding, rumen pH was reduced in cows fed LA diets but not HA diets. Feeding LAL resulted in the greatest subclinical acidosis risk (pH <5.8 for 355 min on the first recovery day). Animals fed LA produced 4.4 L less milk on the challenge day in comparison to baseline. It was concluded that short-term feed deprivation detrimentally affected rumen health and milk yield in dairy cattle normally fed ad libitum, but had no effect on DM intake or milk composition. Feeding alfalfa silage in place of corn silage mitigated acidosis risk due to interrupted feed supply, likely due to a combination of lower starch concentration in HA diets, greater effective fiber concentration, and higher buffering capacity of alfalfa relative to corn silage.
(1) 检测 6 小时禁食后再采食是否会引起奶牛酸中毒;(2) 定量评估日粮中增加紫花苜蓿青贮比例对缓解酸中毒的效果。紫花苜蓿青贮占饲草料干物质的 25%或 75%(低紫花苜蓿青贮饲粮,LA;高紫花苜蓿青贮饲粮,HA),且切短至 14 或 19mm 理论长度(短切,S;长切,L)。4 头奶牛(泌乳第 5 或 6 胎,泌乳天数 161d)采用 4×4 拉丁方试验设计,接受 4 种饲粮处理(LAS、LAL、HAS 和 HAL),每个试验周期 21d。LA 饲粮的淀粉浓度比 HA 饲粮高 69g/kg 干物质。第 18 天的 6 小时停食后,奶牛自由采食。在每个周期的基础日、挑战日和随后的 2 个恢复日,测定奶牛的干物质采食量、产奶量及组成、瘤胃 pH 值、采食和反刍行为。与基础日相比,采食 LA 饲粮的奶牛在恢复第 1 天的瘤胃 pH 值降低,而采食 HA 饲粮的奶牛则没有变化。与采食其他饲粮的奶牛相比,采食 LAL 饲粮的奶牛在恢复第 1 天首次出现 355min 瘤胃 pH 值<5.8 的时间更早,其亚临床酸中毒风险最大。与基础日相比,奶牛在挑战日的产奶量减少了 4.4L。综上,与自由采食的奶牛相比,短期禁食会损害奶牛的瘤胃健康和产奶量,但对干物质采食量和牛奶成分没有影响。用紫花苜蓿青贮替代玉米青贮可以缓解因采食中断引起的酸中毒风险,这可能是由于 HA 饲粮的淀粉浓度较低、有效纤维浓度较高以及相对于玉米青贮,紫花苜蓿具有更高的缓冲能力。