Hung C P, Ramsden B M, Chen L M, Roe A W
Section of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Vision Res. 2001;41(10-11):1389-407. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00075-x.
Several brightness illusions indicate that borders can dramatically affect the perception of adjoining surfaces. In the Craik-O'Brien-Cornsweet illusion, in particular, two equiluminant surfaces can appear different in brightness due to the contrast border between them. Although the psychophysical nature of this phenomenon has been well characterized, the neural circuitry underlying this effect is unexplored. Here, we have asked whether there are cells in visual cortex which respond to edge-induced illusory brightness percepts such as the Cornsweet. Using optical imaging and single unit recordings methods, we have studied responses of the primary (Area 17) and second (Area 18) visual cortical areas of the anesthetized cat to both real luminance change and Cornsweet brightness change. We find that there are indeed cells whose responses are modulated in phase with the modulation of the Cornsweet stimulus. These cells are present in both Area 17 and Area 18, but are more prevalent in Area 18. These responses are generally weak and are found even when receptive fields are distant from the contrast border. Consistent with perception, cells which respond to the Cornsweet border are modulated in antiphase to the Narrow Real (another border-induced illusory brightness stimulus). Remarkably, we also find evidence of edge-induced responses to illusory brightness change using intrinsic signal optical imaging. Both real luminance change and edge-induced brightness change produces a greater imaged response in Area 18 than in Area 17. Thus, in the absence of direct luminance stimulation, cells in visual cortex can respond to modulation of distant border contrasts. We suggest that the perception of surface brightness was encoded in the early visual cortical pathway by both surface luminance contrast signals in Area 17 (Rossi, A. F., Rittenhouse, C. D., & Paradiso, M. A. (1996). The representation of brightness in primary visual cortex. Science, 273, 1104-7) and border-induced contrast signals that predominate in Area 18.
几种亮度错觉表明,边界会显著影响对相邻表面的感知。特别是在Craik-O'Brien-Cornsweet错觉中,由于两个等亮度表面之间的对比边界,它们看起来在亮度上会有所不同。尽管这一现象的心理物理学特性已得到充分描述,但其背后的神经回路仍未被探索。在这里,我们研究了视觉皮层中是否存在对边缘诱导的错觉亮度感知(如Cornsweet错觉)做出反应的细胞。我们使用光学成像和单神经元记录方法,研究了麻醉猫的初级视觉皮层(17区)和次级视觉皮层(18区)对真实亮度变化和Cornsweet亮度变化的反应。我们发现确实存在一些细胞,其反应会随着Cornsweet刺激的调制而同步调制。这些细胞在17区和18区都有,但在18区更为普遍。这些反应通常较弱,即使感受野远离对比边界时也能发现。与感知一致,对Cornsweet边界做出反应的细胞与对窄真实边界(另一种边界诱导的错觉亮度刺激)的反应呈反相调制。值得注意的是,我们还利用内在信号光学成像发现了边缘诱导的对错觉亮度变化的反应证据。真实亮度变化和边缘诱导的亮度变化在18区产生的成像反应都比在17区更大。因此,在没有直接亮度刺激的情况下,视觉皮层中的细胞可以对远处边界对比度的调制做出反应。我们认为,表面亮度的感知在早期视觉皮层通路中是由17区的表面亮度对比信号(Rossi, A. F., Rittenhouse, C. D., & Paradiso, M. A. (1996). The representation of brightness in primary visual cortex. Science, 273, 1104 - 7)和在18区占主导地位的边界诱导对比信号共同编码的。