Suppr超能文献

孕期物质使用筛查工具的比较与验证:在马里兰州产前诊所进行的一项横断面研究。

Comparison and validation of screening tools for substance use in pregnancy: a cross-sectional study conducted in Maryland prenatal clinics.

作者信息

Coleman-Cowger Victoria H, Oga Emmanuel A, Peters Erica N, Trocin Kathleen, Koszowski Bartosz, Mark Katrina

机构信息

Public Health Research & Translational Science, Battelle Memorial Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 17;8(2):e020248. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020248.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Prescription-drug use in the USA has increased by more than 60% in the last three decades. Prevalence of prescription-drug use among pregnant women is currently estimated around 50%. Prevalence of illicit drug use in the USA is 14.6% among pregnant adolescents, 8.6% among pregnant young adults and 3.2% among pregnant adults. The first step in identifying problematic drug use during pregnancy is screening; however, no specific substance-use screener has been universally recommended for use with pregnant women to identify illicit or prescription-drug use. This study compares and validates three existing substance-use screeners for pregnancy-4 P's Plus, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Quick Screen/Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) and the Substance Use Risk Profile-Pregnancy (SURP-P) scale.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a cross-sectional study designed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and usability of existing substance-use screeners. Recruitment occurs at two obstetrics clinics in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. We are recruiting 500 participants to complete a demographic questionnaire, NIDA Quick Screen/ASSIST, 4 P's Plus and SURP-P (ordered randomly) during their regularly scheduled prenatal appointment, then again 1 week later by telephone. Participants consent to multidrug urine testing, hair drug testing and allowing access to prescription drug and birth outcome data from electronic medical records. For each screener, reliability and validity will be assessed. Test-retest reliability analysis will be conducted by examining the results of repeated screener administrations within 1 week of original screener administrations for consistency via correlation analysis. Furthermore, we will assess if there are differences in the validity of each screener by age, race and trimester.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Maryland (HP-00072042), Baltimore, and Battelle Memorial Institute (0619-100106433). All participants are required to give their informed consent prior to any study procedure.

摘要

引言

在过去三十年中,美国的处方药使用量增加了60%以上。目前估计孕妇中处方药的使用率约为50%。美国孕妇青少年中非法药物使用率为14.6%,孕妇青年中为8.6%,孕妇成年人中为3.2%。孕期识别有问题药物使用的第一步是筛查;然而,尚未有专门针对孕妇的物质使用筛查工具被普遍推荐用于识别非法或处方药使用情况。本研究比较并验证了三种现有的孕期物质使用筛查工具——4P's Plus、美国国立药物滥用研究所(NIDA)快速筛查/酒精、吸烟和物质使用情况筛查测试(ASSIST)以及物质使用风险概况-孕期(SURP-P)量表。

方法与分析

这是一项横断面研究,旨在评估现有物质使用筛查工具的敏感性、特异性和可用性。招募工作在美国马里兰州巴尔的摩的两家产科诊所进行。我们正在招募500名参与者,让他们在定期的产前检查期间完成一份人口统计学问卷、NIDA快速筛查/ASSIST、4P's Plus和SURP-P(随机排序),然后在1周后通过电话再次进行。参与者同意进行多药物尿液检测、毛发药物检测,并允许获取电子病历中的处方药和出生结局数据。对于每个筛查工具,将评估其可靠性和有效性。通过相关性分析检查原始筛查工具给药后1周内重复进行筛查工具给药的结果,以评估重测信度。此外,我们将评估每个筛查工具的有效性在年龄、种族和孕期方面是否存在差异。

伦理与传播

本研究已获得美国马里兰州巴尔的摩大学机构审查委员会(HP-00072042)和巴特尔纪念研究所(0619-100106433)的批准。所有参与者在任何研究程序之前都必须给予知情同意。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b647/5855391/5c7baf999417/bmjopen-2017-020248f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验