Kaufman Sheila, Suplee Patricia D, Campbell-Oparaji Damali M, Blumenfeld Julie
Virtua Health, Camden, New Jersey.
School of Nursing-Camden, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Camden, New Jersey.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2024 Nov-Dec;69(6):952-957. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13697. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
Screening for substance use disorder (SUD) is an essential part of antepartum care. Best practice for screening requires the use of a validated tool early in pregnancy to identify those at risk and to connect them with counseling and treatment. In many health systems and practices, urine toxicology testing is erroneously employed as a SUD screening tool despite consistent recommendations against its routine use. The results are often misinterpreted as diagnostic of SUD and can have harmful downstream effects for pregnant and birthing people. This Clinical Rounds reviews the tools available for evidence-based SUD screenings in pregnancy care, pitfalls of urine toxicology testing, and ways in which midwifery care is well-positioned to implement evidence-based screening practices in pregnancy care.
物质使用障碍(SUD)筛查是产前护理的重要组成部分。筛查的最佳做法是在妊娠早期使用经过验证的工具,以识别有风险的人,并为他们提供咨询和治疗。在许多卫生系统和医疗机构中,尽管一直有人建议不要将尿液毒理学检测作为常规检测手段,但该检测仍被错误地用作SUD筛查工具。其结果常常被误解为SUD的诊断依据,可能会对孕妇和产妇产生有害的下游影响。本次临床病例讨论回顾了可用于孕期护理中基于循证的SUD筛查工具、尿液毒理学检测的陷阱,以及助产护理在实施孕期护理中基于循证的筛查实践方面的优势。