Suppr超能文献

在为分娩者筛查物质使用障碍时实施最佳实践。

Implementing Best Practice When Screening Birthing People for a Substance Use Disorder.

作者信息

Kaufman Sheila, Suplee Patricia D, Campbell-Oparaji Damali M, Blumenfeld Julie

机构信息

Virtua Health, Camden, New Jersey.

School of Nursing-Camden, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Camden, New Jersey.

出版信息

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2024 Nov-Dec;69(6):952-957. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13697. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

Abstract

Screening for substance use disorder (SUD) is an essential part of antepartum care. Best practice for screening requires the use of a validated tool early in pregnancy to identify those at risk and to connect them with counseling and treatment. In many health systems and practices, urine toxicology testing is erroneously employed as a SUD screening tool despite consistent recommendations against its routine use. The results are often misinterpreted as diagnostic of SUD and can have harmful downstream effects for pregnant and birthing people. This Clinical Rounds reviews the tools available for evidence-based SUD screenings in pregnancy care, pitfalls of urine toxicology testing, and ways in which midwifery care is well-positioned to implement evidence-based screening practices in pregnancy care.

摘要

物质使用障碍(SUD)筛查是产前护理的重要组成部分。筛查的最佳做法是在妊娠早期使用经过验证的工具,以识别有风险的人,并为他们提供咨询和治疗。在许多卫生系统和医疗机构中,尽管一直有人建议不要将尿液毒理学检测作为常规检测手段,但该检测仍被错误地用作SUD筛查工具。其结果常常被误解为SUD的诊断依据,可能会对孕妇和产妇产生有害的下游影响。本次临床病例讨论回顾了可用于孕期护理中基于循证的SUD筛查工具、尿液毒理学检测的陷阱,以及助产护理在实施孕期护理中基于循证的筛查实践方面的优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665d/11622360/3f4d184ebd55/JMWH-69-952-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验