University of Lleida, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain.
Institute of Biomedical Research of Lleida (IRB Lleida), University of Lleida, Avda. de l'Estudi General, 4, 25001, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain.
Psychol Res. 2020 Feb;84(1):15-22. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-0991-x. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
The current research was designed to assess possible differences in the emotional content of pleasant and unpleasant face emoji using acoustically evoked eyeblink startle reflex response. Stimuli were selected from Emojipedia Webpage. First, we assessed these stimuli with a previous independent sample of 190 undergraduate students (46 males and 144 females) mean age of 21.43 years (SD 3.89). A principal axis method was performed using the 30 selected emoji faces, extracting two factors (15 pleasant and 15 unpleasant emoji). Second, we measured the acoustic startle reflex modulation in 53 young adult women [mean age 22.13 years (SD 4.3)] during the viewing of each of the 30 emoji emotional faces in the context of the theory of motivation and emotion proposed by Lang (1995), but considering only the valence dimension. We expected to find higher acoustically evoked startle responses when viewing unpleasant emoji and lower responses for pleasant ones, similarly to the results obtained in the studies using human faces as emotional stimulus. An ANOVA was conducted to compare acoustic startle responses associated with pleasant and unpleasant emoji. Results yielded main effects for picture valence (λ = 0.80, F(1, 50) = 12.80, p = .001, η = 0.20). Post-hoc t test analysis indicated significant differences in the startle response between unpleasant (50.95 ± 1.75) and pleasant (49.14 ± 2.49) emoji (t (52) = 3.59, p = .001), with a Cohen's d = 0.495. Viewing affective facial emoji expressions modulates the acoustic startle reflex response according to their emotional content.
本研究旨在使用听觉诱发的眨眼 startle 反射反应评估愉快和不愉快面部表情符号的情感内容可能存在的差异。刺激物选自 Emojipedia 网页。首先,我们使用先前的 190 名本科生独立样本(46 名男性和 144 名女性)评估了这些刺激物,平均年龄为 21.43 岁(SD 3.89)。使用 30 个选定的表情符号面孔,使用主轴方法提取了两个因素(15 个愉快的表情符号和 15 个不愉快的表情符号)。其次,我们在 53 名年轻成年女性中测量了听觉 startle 反射调制[平均年龄为 22.13 岁(SD 4.3)],在观看每个 30 个情感表情符号时,根据 Lang(1995)提出的动机和情感理论,但只考虑效价维度。我们预计在观看不愉快的表情符号时会产生更高的听觉诱发 startle 反应,而观看愉快的表情符号时反应会更低,这与使用人类面孔作为情绪刺激的研究结果相似。进行了方差分析以比较与愉快和不愉快表情符号相关的听觉 startle 反应。结果产生了图片效价的主要效应(λ=0.80,F(1,50)=12.80,p=0.001,η=0.20)。事后 t 检验分析表明,不愉快表情符号(50.95±1.75)和愉快表情符号(49.14±2.49)之间的 startle 反应存在显著差异(t(52)=3.59,p=0.001),Cohen's d=0.495。观看情感面部表情符号会根据其情感内容调节听觉 startle 反射反应。