Ertmer Christian, Zwißler Bernhard, Van Aken Hugo, Christ Michael, Spöhr Fabian, Schneider Axel, Deisz Robert, Jacob Matthias
Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Feb 17;8(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0364-z.
Outcome data on fluid therapy in critically ill patients from randomised controlled trials may be different from data obtained by observational studies under "real-life" conditions. We conducted this prospective, observational study to investigate current practice of fluid therapy (crystalloids and colloids) and associated outcomes in 65 German intensive care units (ICUs). In total, 4545 adult patients who underwent intravenous fluid therapy were included. The main outcome measures were 90-day mortality, ICU mortality and acute kidney injury (AKI). Data were analysed using logistic and Cox regression models, as appropriate.
In the predominantly post-operative overall cohort, unadjusted 90-day mortality was 20.1%. Patients who also received colloids (54.6%) had a higher median Simplified Acute Physiology Score II [25 (interquartile range 11; 41) vs. 17 (7; 31)] and incidence of severe sepsis (10.2 vs. 7.4%) on admission compared to patients who received exclusively crystalloids (45.4%). 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4) was the most common colloid (57.0%). Crude rates of 90-day mortality were higher for patients who received colloids (OR 1.845 [1.560; 2.181]). After adjustment for baseline variables, the HR was 1.666 [1.405; 1.976] and further decreased to indicate no associated risk (HR 1.003 [0.980; 1.027]) when it was adjusted for vasopressor use, severity of disease and transfusions. Similarly, the crude risk of AKI was higher in the colloid group (crude OR 3.056 [2.528; 3.694]), after adjustment for baseline variables OR 1.941 [1.573; 2.397], and after full adjustment OR 0.696 [0.629; 0.770]), the risk of AKI turned out to be reduced. The same was true for the subgroup of patients treated with 6% HES 130/0.4 (crude OR 1.931 [1.541; 2.419], adjusted for baseline variables OR 2.260 [1.730; 2.953] and fully adjusted OR 0.800 [0.704; 0.910]) as compared to crystalloids only.
The present analysis of mostly post-operative patients in routine clinical care did not reveal an independent negative effect of colloids (mostly 6% HES 130/0.4) on renal function or survival after multivariable adjustment. Signals towards a reduced risk in subgroup analyses deserve further study. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01122277, registered May 11th, 2010.
来自随机对照试验的危重症患者液体治疗结果数据可能与“现实生活”条件下观察性研究获得的数据不同。我们开展了这项前瞻性观察性研究,以调查德国65个重症监护病房(ICU)当前的液体治疗(晶体液和胶体液)实践及相关结果。总共纳入了4545例接受静脉液体治疗的成年患者。主要结局指标为90天死亡率、ICU死亡率和急性肾损伤(AKI)。根据情况使用逻辑回归和Cox回归模型分析数据。
在以术后患者为主的总体队列中,未经调整的90天死亡率为20.1%。与仅接受晶体液治疗的患者(45.4%)相比,同时接受胶体液治疗的患者(54.6%)入院时简化急性生理学评分II中位数更高[25(四分位间距11;41)对17(7;31)],严重脓毒症发生率更高(10.2%对7.4%)。6%羟乙基淀粉(HES 130/0.4)是最常用的胶体液(57.0%)。接受胶体液治疗的患者90天死亡率的粗发生率更高(比值比1.845[1.560;2.181])。在对基线变量进行调整后,风险比为1.666[1.405;1.976],在对血管升压药使用、疾病严重程度和输血进行调整后进一步降低,表明无相关风险(风险比1.003[0.980;1.027])。同样,胶体液组AKI的粗风险更高(粗比值比3.056[2.528;3.694]),在对基线变量进行调整后为1.941[1.573;2.397],在进行全面调整后为0.696[0.629;0.770]),AKI风险降低。对于接受6% HES 130/0.4治疗的患者亚组,与仅接受晶体液治疗相比情况相同(粗比值比1.931[1.541;2.419],对基线变量进行调整后为2.260[1.730;2.953],全面调整后为0.800[0.704;0.910])。
本次对常规临床护理中主要为术后患者的分析未发现胶体液(主要为6% HES 130/0.4)在多变量调整后对肾功能或生存有独立的负面影响。亚组分析中显示风险降低的迹象值得进一步研究。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01122277,于2010年5月11日注册。