Mesquida J, Saludes P, Pérez-Madrigal A, Proença L, Cortes E, Enseñat L, Espinal C, Gruartmoner G
Critical Care Center, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.
Serviço de Urgencia Geral, Hospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Dec;32(6):1065-1072. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0113-8. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (PCO), and its correction by the arterial-to-venous oxygen content difference (PCO/CO) have been proposed as additional tools to evaluate tissue hypoxia. Since the relationship between pressure and content of CO (CCO) might be affected by several factors, some authors advocate for the use of CCO/CO. The aim of the present study was to explore the factors that might intervene in the difference between PCO/CO and CCO/CO, and to analyze their association with mortality. Observational study in a 30-bed mixed ICU. Fifty-two septic shock patients within the first 24 h of ICU admission were studied. After restoration of mean arterial pressure, hemodynamic and metabolic parameters were evaluated. A total of 110 sets of measurements were performed. Simultaneous PCO/CO and CCO/CO values were correlated, but agreement analysis showed a significant proportional bias. The difference between PCO/CO and CCO/CO was independently associated with pH, SO, baseline CCO/CO and hemoglobin. A stepwise regression analysis showed that pH was the single best predictor for the magnitude of such difference, with very limited effect of other variables. At inclusion, variables associated with ICU-mortality were lactate, pH, PCO/CO, and the difference between PCO/CO and CCO/CO. Initial SO, PCO, CCO/CO, and cardiac index were not different in survivors and non-survivors. In a population of early septic shock patients, simultaneous values of PCO/CO and CCO/CO were not equivalent, and the main determinant of the magnitude of the difference between these two parameters was pH. The PCO/CO ratio was associated with ICU mortality, whereas CCO/CO was not.
中心静脉血与动脉血二氧化碳分压差(PCO)及其通过动静脉血氧含量差校正值(PCO/CO)已被提议作为评估组织缺氧的辅助工具。由于二氧化碳压力与含量(CCO)之间的关系可能受多种因素影响,一些作者主张使用CCO/CO。本研究的目的是探讨可能影响PCO/CO与CCO/CO差值的因素,并分析它们与死亡率的关联。在一家拥有30张床位的综合性重症监护病房(ICU)进行观察性研究。对52例入住ICU首24小时内的感染性休克患者进行研究。在恢复平均动脉压后,评估血流动力学和代谢参数。共进行了110组测量。同时测量的PCO/CO和CCO/CO值具有相关性,但一致性分析显示存在显著的比例偏差。PCO/CO与CCO/CO的差值独立于pH、SO、基线CCO/CO和血红蛋白。逐步回归分析表明,pH是该差值大小的最佳单一预测指标,其他变量的影响非常有限。纳入研究时,与ICU死亡率相关的变量有乳酸、pH、PCO/CO以及PCO/CO与CCO/CO的差值。幸存者和非幸存者的初始SO、PCO、CCO/CO和心脏指数无差异。在早期感染性休克患者群体中,同时测量的PCO/CO和CCO/CO值不相等,这两个参数差值大小的主要决定因素是pH。PCO/CO比值与ICU死亡率相关,而CCO/CO则不然。