• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中心静脉血与动脉血二氧化碳分压差及静脉高氧的影响:是休克严重程度的限制因素还是额外标志物?

Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference and the effect of venous hyperoxia: A limiting factor, or an additional marker of severity in shock?

作者信息

Saludes P, Proença L, Gruartmoner G, Enseñat L, Pérez-Madrigal A, Espinal C, Mesquida J

机构信息

Critical Care Department, Hospital de Sabadell, Corporació Sanitària Universitària Parc Taulí, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Parc Tauli, 1, 08208, Sabadell, Spain.

Serviço de Medicina Interna, Hospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Dec;31(6):1203-1211. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9954-1. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1007/s10877-016-9954-1
PMID:27832407
Abstract

Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (PCO) has demonstrated its prognostic value in critically ill patients suffering from shock, and current expert recommendations advocate for further resuscitation interventions when PCO is elevated. PCO combination with arterial-venous oxygen content difference (PCO/CO) seems to enhance its performance when assessing anaerobic metabolism. However, the fact that PCO values might be altered by changes in blood O content (the Haldane effect), has been presented as a limitation of PCO-derived variables. The present study aimed at exploring the impact of hyperoxia on PCO and PCO/CO during the early phase of shock. Prospective interventional study. Ventilated patients suffering from shock within the first 24 h of ICU admission. Patients requiring FiO ≥ 0.5 were excluded. At inclusion, simultaneous arterial and central venous blood samples were collected. Patients underwent a hyperoxygenation test (5 min of FiO 100%), and arterial and central venous blood samples were repeated. Oxygenation and CO variables were calculated at both time points. Twenty patients were studied. The main cause of shock was septic shock (70%). The hyperoxygenation trial increased oxygenation parameters in arterial and venous blood, whereas PCO only changed at the venous site. Resulting PCO and PCO/CO significantly increased [6.8 (4.9, 8.1) vs. 7.6 (6.7, 8.5) mmHg, p 0.001; and 1.9 (1.4, 2.2) vs. 2.3 (1.8, 3), p < 0.001, respectively]. Baseline PCO, PCO/CO and SO correlated with the magnitude of PO augmentation at the venous site within the trial (ρ -0.46, p 0.04; ρ 0.6, p < 0.01; and ρ 0.7, p < 0.001, respectively). Increased PCO/CO values were associated with higher mortality in our sample [1.46 (1.21, 1.89) survivors vs. 2.23 (1.86, 2.8) non-survivors, p < 0.01]. PCO and PCO/CO are influenced by oxygenation changes not related to flow. Elevated PCO and PCO/CO values might not only derive from cardiac output inadequacy, but also from venous hyperoxia. Elevated PCO/CO values were associated with higher PO transmission to the venous compartment, suggesting higher shunting phenomena.

摘要

中心静脉 - 动脉二氧化碳分压差(PCO)已在休克重症患者中显示出其预后价值,目前专家建议当PCO升高时应采取进一步的复苏干预措施。在评估无氧代谢时,PCO与动静脉氧含量差(PCO/CO)相结合似乎能提高其评估效能。然而,PCO值可能会因血液氧含量变化(哈氏效应)而改变,这一事实被认为是PCO衍生变量的一个局限性。本研究旨在探讨高氧对休克早期PCO和PCO/CO的影响。前瞻性干预研究。入住重症监护病房(ICU)首24小时内发生休克的通气患者。排除需要吸入氧分数(FiO)≥0.5的患者。纳入研究时,同时采集动脉血和中心静脉血样本。患者接受高氧试验(FiO 100%持续5分钟),之后重复采集动脉血和中心静脉血样本。在两个时间点计算氧合和二氧化碳变量。共研究了20例患者。休克的主要原因是脓毒性休克(70%)。高氧试验增加了动脉血和静脉血中的氧合参数,而PCO仅在静脉部位发生变化。最终PCO和PCO/CO显著升高[分别为6.8(4.9,8.1)mmHg对7.6(6.7,8.5)mmHg,p<0.001;以及1.9(1.4,2.2)对2.3(1.8,3),p<0.001]。基线PCO、PCO/CO和血氧饱和度(SO)与试验中静脉部位氧分压(PO)升高幅度相关(相关系数分别为 -0.46,p = 0.04;0.6,p<0.01;以及0.7,p<0.001)。在我们的样本中,PCO/CO值升高与较高的死亡率相关[存活者为1.46(1.21,1.89),非存活者为2.23(1.86,2.8),p<0.01]。PCO和PCO/CO受与血流无关的氧合变化影响。PCO和PCO/CO值升高可能不仅源于心输出量不足,还源于静脉高氧。PCO/CO值升高与较高的PO向静脉腔的传递相关,提示存在较高的分流现象。

相似文献

1
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference and the effect of venous hyperoxia: A limiting factor, or an additional marker of severity in shock?中心静脉血与动脉血二氧化碳分压差及静脉高氧的影响:是休克严重程度的限制因素还是额外标志物?
J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Dec;31(6):1203-1211. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9954-1. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
2
Respiratory quotient estimations as additional prognostic tools in early septic shock.呼吸商测定作为早期脓毒性休克的额外预后评估工具。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Dec;32(6):1065-1072. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0113-8. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
3
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference combined with arterial-to-venous oxygen content difference (PCO/CO) reflects microcirculatory oxygenation alterations in early septic shock.中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差与动静脉氧含量差(PCO/CO)反映了早期感染性休克时微循环氧合的改变。
J Crit Care. 2019 Oct;53:162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
4
Evaluating tissue hypoxia and the response to fluid administration in septic shock patients: a metabolic cluster analysis.评估脓毒性休克患者的组织缺氧和液体治疗反应:代谢聚类分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02662-y.
5
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference in early resuscitation from septic shock: a prospective observational study.脓毒性休克早期复苏中中心静脉与动脉血二氧化碳分压差值:一项前瞻性观察性研究
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Jul;31(7):371-80. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000064.
6
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference combined with arterial-to-venous oxygen content difference is associated with lactate evolution in the hemodynamic resuscitation process in early septic shock.中心静脉血与动脉血二氧化碳分压差联合动脉血与静脉血氧含量差与早期脓毒性休克血流动力学复苏过程中乳酸的变化相关。
Crit Care. 2015 Mar 28;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0858-0.
7
The Prognostic Value of Central Venous-to-Arterial CO2 Difference/Arterial-Central Venous O2 Difference Ratio in Septic Shock Patients with Central Venous O2 Saturation ≥80.中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差/动脉-中心静脉氧差比值对中心静脉血氧饱和度≥80%的感染性休克患者的预后价值。
Shock. 2017 Nov;48(5):551-557. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000893.
8
[Prognostic value of differences between peripheral arterial and venous blood gas analysis in patients with septic shock].[脓毒性休克患者外周动脉血与静脉血气分析差异的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Aug;30(8):722-726. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.08.002.
9
Ratio of carbon dioxide veno-arterial difference to oxygen arterial-venous difference is not associated with lactate decrease after fluid bolus in critically ill patients with hyperlactatemia: results from a prospective observational study.二氧化碳静脉-动脉差值与氧动脉-静脉差值之比与高乳酸血症危重症患者液体冲击后乳酸降低无关:一项前瞻性观察研究的结果。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jan 31;23(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-01993-6.
10
Arterial-venous PCO2 gradient in early postoperative hours following myocardial revascularization.心肌血运重建术后早期的动静脉二氧化碳分压差
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1996 Oct;37(5):499-503.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical applications of blood gas analysis: a comparative review of arterial and venous blood gas monitoring in critical care.血气分析的临床应用:危重症护理中动脉和静脉血气监测的比较综述
Acute Crit Care. 2025 May;40(2):153-159. doi: 10.4266/acc.000900. Epub 2025 May 30.
2
Association of the central venoustoarterial carbon dioxide difference with low cardiac outputrelated outcomes after cardiac surgery in children a prospective cohort study.儿童心脏手术后中心静脉与动脉血二氧化碳分压差与低心排血量相关结局的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究
Front Pediatr. 2025 May 23;13:1536089. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1536089. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the venous-arterial CO to arterial-venous O content difference ratio.理解静脉血-动脉血二氧化碳含量与动脉血-静脉血氧含量差值之比。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1801-1804. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4233-7. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
2
Ratios of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide content or tension to arteriovenous oxygen content are better markers of global anaerobic metabolism than lactate in septic shock patients.对于感染性休克患者,中心静脉与动脉血二氧化碳含量或分压之比以及动静脉血氧含量之比,是比乳酸更好的全身无氧代谢指标。
Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0110-3. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
3
Evaluating tissue hypoxia and the response to fluid administration in septic shock patients: a metabolic cluster analysis.
评估脓毒性休克患者的组织缺氧和液体治疗反应:代谢聚类分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02662-y.
4
Can perioperative pCO gaps predict complications in patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery randomized to goal-directed therapy or standard care? A secondary analysis.围手术期 pCO 差值能否预测接受择期大腹部手术的患者在接受目标导向治疗或标准治疗后发生并发症?二次分析。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Apr;38(2):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01117-y. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
5
Venous Minus Arterial Carbon Dioxide Gradients in the Monitoring of Tissue Perfusion and Oxygenation: A Narrative Review.静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差在组织灌注和氧合监测中的作用:一篇叙述性综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 6;59(7):1262. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071262.
6
Correlation of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference to arterial-central venous oxygen difference ratio to lactate clearance and prognosis in patients with septic shock: A prospective observational cohort study.脓毒性休克患者中心静脉与动脉血二氧化碳差值与动脉血与中心静脉血氧差值比值对乳酸清除率及预后的相关性:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2022 Jul-Sep;12(3):146-154. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_10_22. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
7
Comparison of central venous minus arterial carbon dioxide pressure to arterial minus central venous oxygen content ratio and lactate levels as predictors of mortality in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中心静脉压与动脉二氧化碳分压差值与动静脉氧含量差和乳酸水平对危重症患者死亡率的预测价值比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022 Apr-Jun;34(2):279-286. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20220026-pt.
8
Changes in central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide tension induced by fluid bolus in critically ill patients.危重症患者液体冲击引起的中心静脉至动脉二氧化碳分压变化。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257314. eCollection 2021.
9
Changes in central venous to arterial carbon dioxide gap (PCO gap) in response to acute changes in ventilation.中心静脉至动脉二氧化碳分压差(PCO gap)在急性通气变化时的变化。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000886.
10
Interpretation of venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference in the resuscitation of septic shock patients.脓毒性休克患者复苏中静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差的解读
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jul;11(Suppl 11):S1538-S1543. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.79.
High central venous-to-arterial CO2 difference/arterial-central venous O2 difference ratio is associated with poor lactate clearance in septic patients after resuscitation.
高中心静脉血与动脉血二氧化碳分压差/动脉血氧含量与中心静脉血氧含量差比值与脓毒症患者复苏后乳酸清除率低相关。
J Crit Care. 2016 Feb;31(1):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.10.017. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
4
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference combined with arterial-to-venous oxygen content difference is associated with lactate evolution in the hemodynamic resuscitation process in early septic shock.中心静脉血与动脉血二氧化碳分压差联合动脉血与静脉血氧含量差与早期脓毒性休克血流动力学复苏过程中乳酸的变化相关。
Crit Care. 2015 Mar 28;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0858-0.
5
Evaluating tissue oxygenation at the bedside: global, regional, or both?在床边评估组织氧合:整体评估、局部评估,还是两者兼顾?
J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Aug;29(4):431-3. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9690-y. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
6
Combination of arterial lactate levels and venous-arterial CO2 to arterial-venous O 2 content difference ratio as markers of resuscitation in patients with septic shock.动脉血乳酸水平与静脉-动脉血二氧化碳分压与动静脉血氧含量差比值相结合作为脓毒性休克患者复苏指标的研究
Intensive Care Med. 2015 May;41(5):796-805. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3720-6. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
7
Prospective evaluation of regional oxygen saturation to estimate central venous saturation in sepsis.脓毒症中通过区域氧饱和度评估来估计中心静脉饱和度的前瞻性研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Aug;29(4):443-53. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9683-x. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
8
Repeatability of blood gas parameters, PCO2 gap, and PCO2 gap to arterial-to-venous oxygen content difference in critically ill adult patients.危重症成年患者血气参数、二氧化碳分压差值及二氧化碳分压差值与动静脉血氧含量差的可重复性
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jan;94(3):e415. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000415.
9
Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.循环休克与血流动力学监测共识。欧洲重症监护医学学会特别工作组。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1795-815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
10
Oxygen challenge test in septic shock patients: prognostic value and influence of respiratory status.脓毒性休克患者的氧激发试验:预后价值及呼吸状态的影响
Shock. 2014 Jun;41(6):504-9. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000156.