John P. Murtha Cancer Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 11300 Rockville Pike, Suite 1120, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA.
Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Jun;12(3):407-416. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0680-1. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
This study investigates transition rates between breast cancer diagnosis, recurrence, and death by insurance benefit type and care source in U.S. Military Health System (MHS).
The MHS data repository and central cancer registry linked data were used to identify women aged 40-64 with histologically confirmed breast cancer between 2003 and 2007. Three-state continuous time Markov models were used to estimate transition rates and transition rate ratios (TRRs) by TRICARE benefit type (Prime or non-Prime) and care source (direct, purchased, or both), adjusted for demographic, tumor, and treatment variables.
Analyses included 2668 women with transitions from diagnosis to recurrence (n = 832), recurrence to death (n = 79), and diagnosis to death without recurrence (n = 91). Compared to women with Prime within each care source, women with non-Prime using both care sources had higher transition rates (TRR 1.47, 95% CI 1.03, 2.10). Compared to those using direct care within each benefit type, women utilizing both care sources with non-Prime had higher transition rates (TRR 1.86, 95% CI 1.11, 3.13), while women with Prime utilizing purchased care had lower transition rates (TRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68, 0.98).
In the MHS, women with non-Prime benefit plans compared to Prime had higher transition rates along the breast cancer continuum among both care source users. Purchased care users had lower transition rates than direct care users among Prime beneficiaries.
Benefit plan and care source may be associated with breast cancer progression. Further research is needed to demonstrate differences in survivorship.
本研究通过美国军事卫生系统(MHS)的保险福利类型和护理来源,调查乳腺癌诊断、复发和死亡之间的转移率。
使用 MHS 数据存储库和中央癌症登记处链接数据,确定 2003 年至 2007 年间患有组织学确诊乳腺癌的 40-64 岁女性。使用三状态连续时间马尔可夫模型,根据人口统计学、肿瘤和治疗变量,估计按 TRICARE 福利类型(Prime 或非 Prime)和护理来源(直接、购买或两者兼有)的转移率和转移率比(TRR)。
分析包括 2668 名从诊断到复发(n=832)、复发到死亡(n=79)和无复发诊断到死亡(n=91)的女性。与每个护理来源中使用 Prime 的女性相比,每个护理来源中使用非 Prime 且同时使用两种护理来源的女性转移率更高(TRR 1.47,95%CI 1.03,2.10)。与每种福利类型中使用直接护理的女性相比,非 Prime 同时使用两种护理来源的女性转移率更高(TRR 1.86,95%CI 1.11,3.13),而 Prime 利用购买护理的女性转移率更低(TRR 0.82,95%CI 0.68,0.98)。
在 MHS 中,与 Prime 相比,非 Prime 福利计划的女性在两种护理来源的使用者中,沿着乳腺癌连续体的转移率更高。与直接护理使用者相比,Prime 福利计划的购买护理使用者的转移率更低。
对于癌症幸存者:福利计划和护理来源可能与乳腺癌的进展有关。需要进一步的研究来证明生存差异。