• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用脱细胞真皮基质的开放式、单阶段择期腹壁重建术后的住院再入院会影响长期疝复发率。

Hospital readmission following open, single-stage, elective abdominal wall reconstructions using acellular dermal matrix affects long-term hernia recurrence rate.

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.

Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2018 Jul;216(1):60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.072. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.072
PMID:29458969
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the incidence of and the risk factors for readmission in patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) using acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and assess whether readmission affects AWR long-term outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center study of patients underwent AWR with ADM was conducted. The primary outcome was the incidence of unplanned readmission within 30 days after the initial discharge post-AWR. Secondary outcomes were surgical site occurrence (SSO) and hernia recurrence at follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 452 patients (mean age, 59 years; mean follow-up, 35 months), 29 (6.4%) were readmitted within 30 days. Most readmissions were due to SSO (44.8%) or wound infections (12.8%). The hernia recurrence rate was significantly higher in readmitted patients (17.2% vs 9.9%; P = 0.044). Wider defects, prolonged operative time, and coronary artery disease were independent predictors of readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Readmission is associated with hernia recurrence on long-term follow-up. SSO is the most common cause for readmission.

摘要

背景

我们评估了使用脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)进行腹壁重建(AWR)的患者的再入院发生率和相关风险因素,并评估再入院是否会影响 AWR 的长期结果。

方法

对接受 ADM 行 AWR 的患者进行了回顾性单中心研究。主要结局是 AWR 初始出院后 30 天内计划外再入院的发生率。次要结局是随访时的手术部位发生(SSO)和疝复发。

结果

452 例患者(平均年龄 59 岁;平均随访 35 个月)中,29 例(6.4%)在 30 天内再入院。大多数再入院是由于 SSO(44.8%)或伤口感染(12.8%)。再入院患者的疝复发率显著更高(17.2% vs 9.9%;P=0.044)。更大的缺损、手术时间延长和冠状动脉疾病是再入院的独立预测因素。

结论

再入院与长期随访时的疝复发相关。SSO 是再入院的最常见原因。

相似文献

1
Hospital readmission following open, single-stage, elective abdominal wall reconstructions using acellular dermal matrix affects long-term hernia recurrence rate.采用脱细胞真皮基质的开放式、单阶段择期腹壁重建术后的住院再入院会影响长期疝复发率。
Am J Surg. 2018 Jul;216(1):60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.072. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
2
Long-Term Outcomes after Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix.脱细胞真皮基质用于腹壁重建后的长期疗效
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Mar;224(3):341-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.11.017. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
3
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Concomitant Ostomy-Associated Hernia Repair: Outcomes and Propensity Score Analysis.腹壁重建联合造口相关疝修补术:结果与倾向评分分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Mar;224(3):351-361.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
4
Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysis.与桥接生物补片修复腹壁重建相比,采用生物补片加强的一期筋膜闭合术并发症和复发率更低:一项倾向评分分析。
Surgery. 2017 Feb;161(2):499-508. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
5
Advanced age does not affect abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes using acellular dermal matrix: A comparative study using propensity score analysis.高龄不影响使用脱细胞真皮基质进行腹壁重建的效果:一项倾向评分分析的比较研究。
Am J Surg. 2017 Jun;213(6):1046-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
6
A Comparison of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.脱细胞真皮基质在腹壁重建中的比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;82(4):435-440. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001692.
7
Outcomes of Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with a Bovine versus a Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.牛与猪去细胞真皮基质在腹壁重建中的效果比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Oct 1;152(4):872-881. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010292. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
8
Early Clinical Outcomes of a Novel Antibiotic-Coated, Non-Crosslinked Porcine Acellular Dermal Graft after Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.新型抗生素涂层、非交联猪脱细胞真皮移植物在复杂腹壁重建后的早期临床结果
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Oct;223(4):581-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.05.022. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
9
Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix are not affected by wound contamination.使用脱细胞真皮基质进行腹壁重建的结果不受伤口污染的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Nov;219(5):853-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.06.021. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
10
Revising Recommendations and Outcome Measurements after Complex Open Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.复杂开放性腹壁重建术后的修订建议与结果测量
Am Surg. 2015 Oct;81(10):955-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Synthesis of existing literature on the colorectal surgery patients' challenges during hospital-to-home transitions: a scoping review protocol.结直肠手术患者从医院过渡到家庭期间面临的挑战的现有文献综述:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e083332. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083332.