Department of General, Oncologic and Geriatric Surgery, Jagiellonian Univeristy Medical College, 35-37 Pradnicka Str., 31-202, Krakow, Poland.
Department of Prophylaxis and Experimental Dentistry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 4 Montelupich Str., 31-155, Krakow, Poland.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 May-Jun;76:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
The Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) is a simple and rapid scoring system predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity. However, it remains unknown whether it might be useful in fit and frail older patients undergoing abdominal emergency surgery.
Consecutive patients ≥65 years, needing emergency abdominal surgery were enrolled in this prospective study. Additionally to the SAS, the G8 screening score was used to determine the frailty status. The logistic regression analysis was conducted investigating the association between the scores and 30-day postoperative outcomes.
The study sample comprised 315 older patients (165 female, 150 male) with a median age of 77 (range 65-100) years old. The prevalence of frailty was 60.3%. The most frequent surgical indications were acute cholecystitis, followed by ileus, complicated diverticulitis, ulcer perforation, complication of gastric cancer and other causes. The decreasing SAS was significantly associated with the increasing likelihood of both 30-day postoperative major complications (p < 0.01) and death (p < 0.01) both in fit and frail older patients. Multivariate analyses have identified the G8, frailty screening test, and the SAS score as independent factors that predict postoperative adverse events. The model combining both scores increased the discriminatory ability for 30-day postoperative major morbidity and mortality.
The SAS confirmed to be a simple and powerful predictor of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality both in fit and frail older patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. The department allocation algorithm based of the combination of the G8 and the SAS may be considered as an option to improve the outcomes of older patients undergoing abdominal emergency surgery.
手术 Apgar 评分(SAS)是一种预测术后死亡率和发病率的简单快速评分系统。然而,尚不清楚其在接受腹部急诊手术的健康和虚弱老年人中是否有用。
本前瞻性研究纳入了需要急诊腹部手术的连续≥65 岁患者。除了 SAS 外,还使用 G8 筛查评分来确定虚弱状态。进行逻辑回归分析,以调查评分与 30 天术后结局之间的关联。
研究样本包括 315 名年龄中位数为 77 岁(范围 65-100 岁)的老年患者(165 名女性,150 名男性)。虚弱的患病率为 60.3%。最常见的手术指征是急性胆囊炎,其次是肠梗阻、复杂憩室炎、溃疡穿孔、胃癌并发症和其他原因。SAS 降低与 30 天术后主要并发症(p<0.01)和死亡(p<0.01)的发生几率增加显著相关,无论患者是否健康。多变量分析确定了 G8、虚弱筛查试验和 SAS 评分是预测术后不良事件的独立因素。将这两个评分结合起来的模型增加了 30 天术后主要发病率和死亡率的判别能力。
SAS 证实是预测健康和虚弱老年人接受急诊腹部手术 30 天术后发病率和死亡率的简单而强大的指标。基于 G8 和 SAS 组合的科室分配算法可被视为改善接受腹部急诊手术的老年患者结局的一种选择。