Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom, and
Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 21;38(12):3116-3123. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2645-17.2017. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
The sensory recruitment hypothesis states that visual short-term memory is maintained in the same visual cortical areas that initially encode a stimulus' features. Although it is well established that the distance between features in visual cortex determines their visibility, a limitation known as crowding, it is unknown whether short-term memory is similarly constrained by the cortical spacing of memory items. Here, we investigated whether the cortical spacing between sequentially presented memoranda affects the fidelity of memory in humans (of both sexes). In a first experiment, we varied cortical spacing by taking advantage of the log-scaling of visual cortex with eccentricity, presenting memoranda in peripheral vision sequentially along either the radial or tangential visual axis with respect to the fovea. In a second experiment, we presented memoranda sequentially either within or beyond the critical spacing of visual crowding, a distance within which visual features cannot be perceptually distinguished due to their nearby cortical representations. In both experiments and across multiple measures, we found strong evidence that the ability to maintain visual features in memory is unaffected by cortical spacing. These results indicate that the neural architecture underpinning working memory has properties inconsistent with the known behavior of sensory neurons in visual cortex. Instead, the dissociation between perceptual and memory representations supports a role of higher cortical areas such as posterior parietal or prefrontal regions or may involve an as yet unspecified mechanism in visual cortex in which stimulus features are bound to their temporal order. Although much is known about the resolution with which we can remember visual objects, the cortical representation of items held in short-term memory remains contentious. A popular hypothesis suggests that memory of visual features is maintained via the recruitment of the same neural architecture in sensory cortex that encodes stimuli. We investigated this claim by manipulating the spacing in visual cortex between sequentially presented memoranda such that some items shared cortical representations more than others while preventing perceptual interference between stimuli. We found clear evidence that short-term memory is independent of the intracortical spacing of memoranda, revealing a dissociation between perceptual and memory representations. Our data indicate that working memory relies on different neural mechanisms from sensory perception.
感觉募集假说指出,视觉短期记忆是在最初编码刺激特征的相同视觉皮层区域中维持的。虽然已经确定视觉皮层中特征之间的距离决定了它们的可见性,这是一种称为拥挤的限制,但尚不清楚短期记忆是否也受到记忆项目的皮层间隔的限制。在这里,我们研究了在人类(男性和女性)中,顺序呈现的记忆项之间的皮层间隔是否会影响记忆的保真度。在第一个实验中,我们利用视觉皮层随离轴距离的对数标度,在周边视觉中沿径向或切向相对于中央凹依次呈现记忆项,从而改变皮层间隔。在第二个实验中,我们在视觉拥挤的关键间隔内或之外依次呈现记忆项,在这个距离内,由于附近的皮层代表,视觉特征无法被感知区分。在两个实验中并通过多个测量,我们发现有强有力的证据表明,在记忆中保持视觉特征的能力不受皮层间隔的影响。这些结果表明,支持工作记忆的神经结构具有与视觉皮层中感觉神经元的已知行为不一致的特性。相反,知觉和记忆表示之间的分离支持了后顶叶或前额叶等更高皮层区域的作用,或者可能涉及视觉皮层中尚未指定的机制,在该机制中,刺激特征与其时间顺序相关联。虽然我们对能够记住视觉对象的分辨率了解很多,但短期记忆中保持的项目的皮层表示仍然存在争议。一个流行的假设表明,视觉特征的记忆是通过在编码刺激的感觉皮层中募集相同的神经结构来维持的。我们通过操纵顺序呈现的记忆项之间的视觉皮层间隔来研究这种说法,使得一些项目比其他项目共享更多的皮层表示,同时防止刺激之间的知觉干扰。我们发现明确的证据表明,短期记忆与记忆项的皮层间隔无关,显示出知觉和记忆表示之间的分离。我们的数据表明,工作记忆依赖于与感觉感知不同的神经机制。