de Vries Eelke, Fejer George, van Ede Freek
Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Commun Psychol. 2023;1(1):41. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00042-9. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
Space and time can each act as scaffolds for the individuation and selection of visual objects in working memory. Here we ask whether there is a trade-off between the use of space and time for visual working memory: whether observers will rely less on space, when memoranda can additionally be individuated through time. We tracked the use of space through directional biases in microsaccades after attention was directed to memory contents that had been encoded simultaneously or sequentially to the left and right of fixation. We found that spatial gaze biases were preserved when participants could (Experiment 1) and even when they had to (Experiment 2) additionally rely on time for object individuation. Thus, space remains a profound organizing medium for working memory even when other organizing sources are available and utilized, with no evidence for an obligatory trade-off between the use of space and time.
空间和时间都可以作为工作记忆中视觉对象个体化和选择的框架。在这里,我们探讨在视觉工作记忆中,空间和时间的使用之间是否存在权衡:当记忆内容可以通过时间额外个体化时,观察者是否会减少对空间的依赖。在注意力指向在注视点左右同时或相继编码的记忆内容后,我们通过微眼跳的方向偏差来追踪空间的使用情况。我们发现,当参与者能够(实验1)甚至必须(实验2)额外依赖时间进行对象个体化时,空间注视偏差仍然存在。因此,即使有其他组织来源可供使用,空间仍然是工作记忆的一个重要组织媒介,没有证据表明空间和时间的使用之间存在必然的权衡。